Page 3 of 52 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 772
  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick777 View Post
    Well this guy tried to break in near Brianna's house, so it wouldn't be a reach to think he had stolen the pink underwear at some point earlier because there were alot of people coming and going.
    I would think that KT or whoever owned the underwear would have known how recently she had them. If she'd been missing them only since the night of Jan 20th, then he probably took them at the same time he took Brianna.


  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by aj1020 View Post
    I'm with you - this sounds too complicated/time consuming to me. But maybe the perp has an underwear fetish. I would think they would have had to come from a laundry room or some dirty clothes area rather than from KT's room and I doubt they were just hanging out on the living room floor. I thought there were 2 girls and 2 guys living on in the house and the other girl was also out of town that weekend (I could be dreaming, it's been a while ago I read that) - maybe they came from the other girls bedroom??
    Remember that the DNA on the thong were from an unknown male and unknown female.


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    344
    Quote Originally Posted by 10EC_Dad View Post
    I am thinking about that also. Initially, I think she must have borrowed the underwear.
    She could have. It's not out of the question. Maybe her time of the month came early or something and she needed a new pair. But it seems strange. And it also seems strange that any of the roommates would have underwear lying around in the "common area." I don't know if there is a laundry room where he could have grabbed them from. Or, more frighteningly, maybe this perp knows KT or one of her other roommates....maybe he was intimate with that person, and that's he has the underwear.

    But why? Why did he take a pair of underwear obviously from that house and use the black thong? This is sounding more and more planned/taunting, whatever you want to call it. And it's also sounding more unbelievable that no one else in that house heard anything strange going on that early morning....


  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by aj1020 View Post
    I would think that KT or whoever owned the underwear would have known how recently she had them. If she'd been missing them only since the night of Jan 20th, then he probably took them at the same time he took Brianna.
    If they were KT's, why would she not claim them?


  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    12,303
    Weve got:

    #1 Pink Panther underwear with the DNA of an unknown man and unknown woman.

    #2 Pink underwear with the DNA of Brianna, the suspect, and one of the firls living at the MacKay Court home.

    Speculation...........the suspect took a pair of underwear from a dirty clothes hamper at the MacKay home and knotted it together with the pink panther underwear and used that to strangle Brianna. DNA from both Brianna and the suspect was transferred to the underwear during the course of strangling her.


  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by 10EC_Dad View Post
    If they were KT's, why would she not claim them?
    I didn't say anything about KT not claiming them, I'm not sure what you mean??

    Rick said the perp could have taken them on an occasion prior to the night Brianna was taken. I was just pointing out that KT or whoever owned them would have known when they went missing. If they went missing that night, then he probably took them when he took Brianna. If she'd been missing them since December let's say, then it's probably a good clue that he'd been in their house before.


  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by newshound81 View Post
    She could have. It's not out of the question. Maybe her time of the month came early or something and she needed a new pair. But it seems strange. And it also seems strange that any of the roommates would have underwear lying around in the "common area." I don't know if there is a laundry room where he could have grabbed them from. Or, more frighteningly, maybe this perp knows KT or one of her other roommates....maybe he was intimate with that person, and that's he has the underwear.

    But why? Why did he take a pair of underwear obviously from that house and use the black thong? This is sounding more and more planned/taunting, whatever you want to call it. And it's also sounding more unbelievable that no one else in that house heard anything strange going on that early morning....
    When you consider it, the PP thong is still the odd piece of the puzzle.

    If it came from that apartment, why did no one claim them? Why is the DNA from unknowns?


  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by aj1020 View Post
    I didn't say anything about KT not claiming them, I'm not sure what you mean??

    Rick said the perp could have taken them on an occasion prior to the night Brianna was taken. I was just pointing out that KT or whoever owned them would have known when they went missing. If they went missing that night, then he probably took them when he took Brianna. If she'd been missing them since December let's say, then it's probably a good clue that he'd been in their house before.
    LE has been asking the owner of the PP thong to come forward. KT did not come forward. Noone that lives in that apartment came forward.


  9. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by 10EC_Dad View Post
    Remember that the DNA on the thong were from an unknown male and unknown female.
    That was the BLACK pink panther thong with 2 unknown DNA samples on it.

    I'm talking about the PINK underwear. The one that came from the house Brianna was staying at. Those ones had the perp's DNA, Brianna's DNA, and a 3rd DNA belonging the the owner of the thong, who was a resident of the house Brianna was taken from.


  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    344
    Quote Originally Posted by Leila View Post
    Weve got:

    #1 Pink Panther underwear with the DNA of an unknown man and unknown woman.

    #2 Pink underwear with the DNA of Brianna, the suspect, and one of the firls living at the MacKay Court home.

    Speculation...........the suspect took a pair of underwear from a dirty clothes hamper at the MacKay home and knotted it together with the pink panther underwear and used that to strangle Brianna. DNA from both Brianna and the suspect was transferred to the underwear during the course of strangling her.
    Sorry, I posted too slow and realized I repeated a lot of what other said.

    I think that is very possible, Leila. But why would he not just strangle her with his hands? I don't get that. She was a tiny, tiny girl...it wouldn't have taken much to kill her. This creeps me the heck out.


  11. #41
    If he used the underwear in a manner that would cause Bri's death, chances are that her DNA would be present...along with his. I do not think Bri ever wore either pair of the underwear.
    "WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
    THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
    AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"

    A quote spray painted on the wall by search
    and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.



    What I post are my opinions only.


  12. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by 10EC_Dad View Post
    LE has been asking the owner of the PP thong to come forward. KT did not come forward. Noone that lives in that apartment came forward.
    For the third time, I'm not talking about the black/pink panther thong. I'm talking about the PINK underwear that was owned by someone who lives at the house where Brianna was taken from.


  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by aj1020 View Post
    That was the BLACK pink panther thong with 2 unknown DNA samples on it.

    I'm talking about the PINK thong. The one that came from the house Brianna was staying at. Those ones had the perp's DNA, Brianna's DNA, and a 3rd DNA belonging the the owner of the thong, who was a resident of the house Brianna was taken from.
    According to the link the SS provided, LE think that BOTH pieces of underwear came from that apartment.

    Has LE said the pink UW was a thong?


  14. #44
    They are pink underwear. I apologize if I said they were a thong and they're actually a bikini cut. Does it matter?

    "Reno Police Detective Commander Leigha Struffert said laboratory analysis has confirmed the pink women's underwear contain the DNA of the murder suspect, Brianna Denison and the owner of the underwear who was a resident of the Mackay Court residence from which Denison was abducted on January 20."

    from: http://www.krnv.com/Global/story.asp...&nav=menu113_2


  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by aj1020 View Post
    They are pink underwear. I apologize if I said they were a thong and they're actually a bikini cut. Does it matter?

    "Reno Police Detective Commander Leigha Struffert said laboratory analysis has confirmed the pink women's underwear contain the DNA of the murder suspect, Brianna Denison and the owner of the underwear who was a resident of the Mackay Court residence from which Denison was abducted on January 20."

    from: http://www.krnv.com/Global/story.asp...&nav=menu113_2
    I am not sure if it matters other than I wanted to be clear on the facts.


Page 3 of 52 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •