07-10-2008, 04:33 AM #1
Official press release asks the tough questions of mary lacy
For Immediate Release, July 9, 2008
Contact: Tricia Griffith firstname.lastname@example.org
THOUSANDS OF MEMBERS OF FORUMS FOR JUSTICE.ORG SPEAK OUT ON THE RAMSEY CASE. www.forumsforjustice.org/forums
HERE WE GO AGAIN. BOULDER D.A. MARY LACY MAKES A FOOL OF HERSELF IN THE RAMSEY CASE.
You would think Mary Lacy would have learned something from her John Mark Karr fiasco.
Boulder District Attorney Mary Lacy has given the Ramseys a parting gift as she leaves office; she has cleared them of having any connection to the murder of JonBenet, yet she stated on August 28, 2006, “You know, no one is really cleared of a homicide until there's a conviction, in court beyond a reasonable doubt. And I don't think you will get any prosecutor ... unless they were present with the person at the time of the crime ... to clear someone."
Mary Lacy just did what she said neither she, nor anyone else, could do ... clear someone in the Ramseys case without a conviction at trial.
Lacy supposedly "cleared" the Ramseys based on new DNA evidence called “Touch DNA.” This process is relatively new and is known by scientists to still have reliability issues.
Lacy claims because partial, unidentified DNA contamination was found on the long-johns which was pulled over underwear JonBenet was wearing when she died that (and only Mary Lacy could make this leap) the Ramseys are innocent.
Forums for Justice.org would like to remind Mary Lacy of what she said two years ago,
"The [Ramsey case] DNA could be an artifact. It isn’t necessarily the killer’s." - Boulder DA Mary Lacy, 8/28/06
If this Touch DNA belongs to the "real killer," why isn't it all over the following items: the ligature, paintbrush handle, nylon cord, tape, the white blanket, JonBenet's shirt, the flashlight, the spoon, and the bowl of pineapple the "real killer" allegedly fed JonBenet before they wrote the ransom note and killed her.
The question Mary Lacy has not answered is this:
DID THE "REAL KILLER" TAKE OFF HER GLOVES WHEN SHE LEFT A COUPLE OF SKIN CELLS ON THE PANTS, THEN PUT THEM BACK SO AS NOT TO LEAVE ANY MORE DNA? If the “real killer” used gloves on everything else in the house, why would they take them off to touch the long-johns?
Patsy Ramsey stated she put the long-johns on JonBenet. Her DNA must be on the long-johns too. So why isn't she mentioned?
Lacy claims the DNA on the long-johns matches partial DNA on the underwear. The logical conclusion is that there was transference of a few skin cells since the long-johns WERE PULLED OVER THE UNDERWEAR.
It has been reported the DNA is not even a full complete sample. Has that changed?
Forums for Justice.org would like to ask Mary Lacy one final question; WHAT ABOUT THE 2 1/2 PAGE RANSOM NOTE. The note has been matched to Patsy Ramsey's handwriting by several well respected handwriting analysts.
Remember Mary Lacy was sure she had the killer in 2006. John Mark Karr was another red herring offered by Mary Lacy. As citizens interested in justice we must question everything Mary Lacy tells us. She can't be trusted as she has proven time and time again.
07-10-2008, 04:40 AM #2
07-10-2008, 04:50 AM #3
07-10-2008, 09:15 AM #4
Thank you Tricia.
I just heard on the radio that Michael Baden disagreed with her! He said with additional DNA, you include more people, not exclude them!!!!!!
Apparently, Lacy didn't learn anything from her fiasco with Karr. But then again, should WE be surprised??????
07-10-2008, 09:17 AM #5Former Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
I haven't posted here in a while, but have to say that Mary Lacy may have just fulfilled the bias she was known to harbor when she took over the job....anything to exonerate the Ramseys.
And that is because, even if there's actual DNA of an unknown participant, that fact fully comports with my expressed theory of a ransom note written by Patsy as part of a scheme to either explain away known sexual abuse by a family member before being discovered by her MD, or something else, like creating a dramatic history for a future Miss America contestant (you can't win now without triumphing over some adversity, a tough problem for a rich and privledged white gal), or even just a scheme to create an excuse to go back to Georgia.
Having an accomplice to take JonBenet to a location where she could be "rescued" by her Dad would have been a reasonable and likely element of what they perceived as a harmless scheme, so it remains as likely as ever there was a scheme put into play.
BUT, the presence of multiple, consistent, male DNA would actually only serve to clarify one other element of my theory: That such a scheme existed, was implemented, but it was an unreliable "helper" who brought about the death of JonBenet by either accident or intent. And while the Ramseys could still be innocent, theories are only theories, Mary Lacy has failed recognize the existence of that type conspiracy, which the ransom note makes very likely. And she knows of that possibility because I personally communicated it to her just after she took office.
07-10-2008, 10:05 AM #6Former Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
Great letter Tricia
07-10-2008, 12:56 PM #7
Big shout out to the wonderful Cherokee who did the hard work on the press release. She provided me with Lacy's quotes among other things.
Thank you so much Cherokee. You are a true friend.
I fully expect to be ignored with this press release. But don't worry. Remember it took over 2 years to get the world to see what we knew all along about Michael Tracey.
Lacy will be exposed, AGAIN.
Remember, there are people out there who know the truth. Someday, I know in my heart, one person will step forward and spill the beans.
07-10-2008, 02:06 PM #8
07-10-2008, 02:20 PM #9Former Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
If I could have just one person start talking it would be Fleet White!
07-10-2008, 06:37 PM #10
You can choose to be bitter or better when handling your problems.
Ø My posts are just my opinion and for entertainment purposes only.
Do not copy any of my post. All post are to remain here.
Christopher McCandless (aka Alexander Supertramp)
2/12/1968 -8/1992 RIP you are missed.
07-10-2008, 07:07 PM #11Former Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
07-10-2008, 07:09 PM #12This is the year to locate Mark Dribin http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ht=Mark+Dribin NamUs MP#876 and Ilene Misheloff http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...lene+Misheloff NamUs MP#6410 and bring them home to their families!
Parents watch your children. Free-range parenting leads to more child victims.
Cruelty to humans begins with cruelty to animals.
I believe in closure, not forgiveness. I'm also unapologetically judgemental.
07-10-2008, 07:18 PM #13Former Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
But I mean if he told the truth like Fleet would. I'd like to hear John Ramsey start talking and telling the truth. Jeez, can you just imagine????
07-11-2008, 06:52 AM #14
Great letter Tricia. I would like someone to ask Mary L.
why all the evidence stored in the warehouse has never been tested.
Her letter and apologies to the Ramsey's is as disgusting as the John Karr fiasco.
Last edited by Darlene733510; 07-11-2008 at 02:22 PM.
07-11-2008, 11:05 AM #15
Thank you for writing that letter, Tricia!
By Jay78 in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 12Last Post: 12-30-2006, 02:07 PM
By CW in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 4Last Post: 10-30-2006, 01:12 PM
By Tricia in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 10Last Post: 09-13-2006, 01:39 AM
By FactorFiction in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 85Last Post: 08-30-2006, 11:16 AM