Results 1 to 15 of 28
Thread: Where are the experts?
07-10-2008, 04:19 PM #1
Where are the experts?
Why are there NO experts weighing in on this so called new "TOUCH DNA" technology. Where is Dr. Henry Lee?
Why is Mary Lacy once again being allowed to make public statements exonerating the Ramsey's when this is still an OPEN investigation?
Why is the community and citizens of Boulder not outraged at the ineptness of the Boulder's DA's office?
Why is it that the media takes Lacy's statements and runs with it without asking the obvious?
How does a district attorney with no scientific background conclude that this DNA belongs to the killer? How does the DNA match conclusively if the strand found in her panties was contaiminated and produced incomplete markers? How does Lacy know the Ramsey's didn't have anyone over to that house? If an intruder got there, so could a friend, alley, or someone who helped cover the crime.
Where is Lou Smit and what's his comment? Where is detective Steve Thomas?
07-10-2008, 04:23 PM #2
For all: Please post all relevent news articles and weblinks to this site. Stories only please, so we can keep up, otherwise they get buried in posts.
07-10-2008, 04:25 PM #3
07-10-2008, 04:31 PM #4
Good Morning America. Lin Wood says "this is a DNA case"
Other videos follow
07-10-2008, 04:39 PM #5
Notice in this clip when John states, we couldn't have possibly been involved, how his eyes shift and he looks down. I am just noticing his body jestures. This is a very long interview with John
07-10-2008, 04:43 PM #6
Mary Lacy in the above interview tells John how very important it is to pay attention to the facts. How did she base the fact that this DNA belongs to the killer?
07-10-2008, 05:19 PM #7
The way to get CNN and other news sources to print accurate facts is to write them with your comments.
07-10-2008, 05:27 PM #8
07-10-2008, 06:08 PM #9
Dr. Henry Lee
Folks, get involved. E-mail Dr. Lee for answers. After all he was the one that stated this was NOT A DNA CASE.
I am curious as to how he feels about this new evidence. Flood his site with injuries. Demand the experts to talk!!!
07-10-2008, 06:11 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
I no longer consider Henry Lee or Michael Baden credible in the least.
THere is no way to tell when they are lying or when they are giving their truthful professional appearance...you can only sell your 'expert opinion' to the highest bidder so many times before you can't be trusted.
07-10-2008, 06:25 PM #11Rest In Peace
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- At the Beach and in our hearts
Fox news today! July 10
Jeffrey Scott Shapiro: DA Wrong to Clear Ramseys
Thursday, July 10, 2008
By Jeffrey Scott Shapiro
Boulder District Attorney Mary Lacy on Wednesday publicly cleared the entire Ramsey family of any involvement in the murder of JonBenet Ramsey, a fatal error that only complements the repeated misjudgments she has made in the case since she was elected.
Her decision was based on the fact that minuscule particles of foreign DNA that were found in JonBenet’s underpants apparently match skin cells discovered on the waistband of JonBenet’s leggings. Although this DNA may match, Lacy’s own words prove this particular DNA may not even be relevant.
MORE AT LINK ABOVE.
07-10-2008, 06:48 PM #12
Thank you for that link. I believe Fox News may have restored my faith in accurate journalism.
07-10-2008, 06:53 PM #13
It’s no secret that in 1997, when Lacy was a sex-assault prosecutor under then-DA Alex Hunter, she was furious when he did not appoint her to work on the case. Because Hunter and the police shied away from the intruder theory, many law enforcement officials often wonder if Lacy’s attempts to prove them wrong are driven more by her personal feelings than by the actual pursuit of justice.
Shortly after taking office, Lacy announced in 2003 that she believed the Ramseys were innocent, an unusual and inappropriate statement for a prosecutor to make during an ongoing investigation.
The above is from the Fox News Report by Jeff Shapiro.
07-10-2008, 06:59 PM #14
"Almost nothing Lacy has done has been based on the solid, investigative work compiled by the Boulder Police Department or the opinions expressed by the FBI. Lacy, who had no official contact with the Ramsey case under the leadership of Hunter, has disregarded the opinions of every law enforcement agency and forensic expert who worked on the case.
Her arrogance and incompetence is beyond compare.
Despite her repeated attempts to convince the public that her belief is grounded in the highly respected science of DNA, it appears that her rationale is flawed. If Lacy were serious about solving the Ramsey case, she would re-invite the original police investigators and FBI agents, who know the case inside and out, to come back and advise her.
She’ll never do that, however, because for Mary Lacy none of this really is about JonBenet — it’s about her legacy and her ego.
Jeffrey Scott Shapiro is an investigative reporter who worked on the JonBenet Ramsey case for more than 10 years. He practices law in Washington, D.C., and can be reached at email@example.com.
07-10-2008, 07:00 PM #15
Voice your concerns
Boulder DA's office