Solace,
I think we have discussed the DNA issue to death, and we obviously don't agree with one another. So, lets talk about some of the other evidence...
Before the new DNA evidence came out, I thought that it was unlikely that the Ramsey's were guilty, but I didn't think the evidence was completely compelling one way or the other.
Putting aside the DNA evidence, what other evidence convinces you that the Ramsey's are guilty? I agree that some things about the case are suspicious...
Jayce,
If you thought that it was unlikely that the Ramsey's were guilty then you should offer cogent reasons for their non-involvement.
There is
no forensic evidence in the house that was deposited by an intruder.
Both parents are forensically linked to the crime-scene e.g. wine-cellar.
Both parents accounts of the sequence of events that night are contradicted by the forensic evidence e.g. the pineapple and Patsy's fibers embedded into the garrote despite Patsy stating she never visited the wine-cellar!
There is forensic evidence suggesting that JonBenet was both acutely and chronically sexually molested. Yet this was cleaned up and hidden from view, not something that any intruder need do. So why hide a sexual assault, who would do that and why, where is the motive?
Why bother with a ransom note, why not just kidnap JonBenet get out of the house and phone in your ransom demand the next day?
What intruder needs to wipe both the
inside and
outside of the flashlight clean? Why not simply slip it into his pocket and leave the house, after all he took JonBenet's size-6 panties.
Sexual rage is the likely motive for sexually assaulting and bludgeoning JonBenet. Overkill is the hallmark of her death, she was garroted , whacked about the head, and likely manually strangled prior to her death. This was no accident, no slip of the hand or sliding of the foot, no medical assistance was sought despite JonBenet's injuries, she was callously dispatched courtesy of the garrote. All the evidence points to the three residents remaining in the house that night, since Burke knows full well what transpired, even he stated that JonBenet walked into the house, on returning from the White's. John stated he carried her sleeping upstairs, and placed her to bed, despite the pineapple suggesting she was awake, walking about snacking pineapple whilst Burke likely sipped tea?
The Ramsey anomalies, inconsistencies, and selective loss of memory all suggest collusion and conspiracy to present abuse and murder as the work of some deranged psychopath. Yet to date, despite JonBenet's multiple injuries, including a skull split open, internal bleeding, both in her brain and genitals, the alleged intruder left no forensic evidence?
Looks like an inside job to me, e.g. a staged crime-scene!
.
