836 users online (185 members and 651 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,778

    The trip to the store

    OK Christine, trying to help here. Lets discuss the early morning store purchases here. Christine, move whatever posts you think may apply, OK?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,579
    This is where it began. Post #186, thread #1, Nancy Cooper.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...29#post2381729

    momto3kids:
    "I have a strong feeling her husband Brad has something to do with this. The police are in possession of a video with Brad early Saturday morning at a local store. He told the police he went to get milk and bread at 6am. The video has Brad buying detergent with bleach and/or bleach actually purchased at 4am. redacted statement I feel this is a cruical piece of evidence indicating something had occured. As I searched with my children yesterday in the construction areas along Kildaire Farm Rd and in the Bluffs Nature park in the pouring rain, I kept hope to hear her yell out for help that the rain would stimulate her."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,579
    FWIW, there was some information redacted by the mods. For security reasons, I believe.

    JMHO
    fran

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,128
    Please keep in mind, that this is just a post by an anonymous person. IT IS NOT FACT, IT IS NOT EVIDENCE. Just because a statement is posted here does not make that a factual statement. The police have not confirmed that they were even there at that store to view or pick up a security video. There is no reason to believe that the investigators in charge would confirm this information to a relative of an employee, yet not confirm it in a press conference.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by fran View Post
    This is where it began. Post #186, thread #1, Nancy Cooper.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...29#post2381729

    momto3kids:
    "I have a strong feeling her husband Brad has something to do with this. The police are in possession of a video with Brad early Saturday morning at a local store. He told the police he went to get milk and bread at 6am. The video has Brad buying detergent with bleach and/or bleach actually purchased at 4am. redacted statement I feel this is a cruical piece of evidence indicating something had occured. As I searched with my children yesterday in the construction areas along Kildaire Farm Rd and in the Bluffs Nature park in the pouring rain, I kept hope to hear her yell out for help that the rain would stimulate her."
    I guess the question here is how does mom know what is on the video?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,128
    Thank Goodness, EXACTLY, finally someone who is thinking logically. How would she know? AND what kind of mother would betray their child's confidence in sharing that information, endanger their child's job and their child's employer's reputation by blabbing that information?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    283
    The poster does not deserved to be impugned. YOU don't know what was redacted there. Several posters who were here then do remember.

    I believe the poster based on what was originally posted and the actions they went to afterwards since it was obvious they weren't aware of the widespread readers on these charts.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    I'm new on the forum and I also happen to live in Cary, about 4 mi from the community. I am following this case very closely and hope our PD is able to resolve it and that the perp will be brought to justice quickly.

    I have my suspicions on who did it, based on what I've read and learned so far.

    One thought on the detergent w/bleach (if that's what was purchased): clothes w/blood or other DNA material may have been stained and perhaps that was why the detergent was purchased.

    Although yes, if you're going to make sure you destroy DNA evidence then burning all items to ashes is really the best way to ensure complete/total destruction.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,128
    I absolutely DO KNOW what was redacted, I read it immediately after it was posted and reread it numerous times after that, as it was being referred to by other posters. It was quite some time after the initial post before any changes were made. I believe that it was not until after it began to be quoted by some print reporters that there was any information removed. I am in no way meaning to be saying anything rude about the poster, only that it is a POST, not a FACT. Anyone here is free to believe it or not as they so choose.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,778
    Quote Originally Posted by raeann View Post
    I absolutely DO KNOW what was redacted, I read it immediately after it was posted and reread it numerous times after that, as it was being referred to by other posters. It was quite some time after the initial post before any changes were made. I believe that it was not until after it began to be quoted by some print reporters that there was any information removed. I am in no way meaning to be saying anything rude about the poster, only that it is a POST, not a FACT. Anyone here is free to believe it or not as they so choose.
    Exactly. That's why I didn't mention it in my list of known facts on the other thread.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,766
    If Brad went to the store at 4am, who was with the girls?
    Did he leave them tucked in bed--ALONE-- while he went to the store? :{

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    Quote Originally Posted by philamena View Post
    If Brad went to the store at 4am, who was with the girls?
    Did he leave them tucked in bed--ALONE-- while he went to the store? :{
    yes he probably did. I believe Nancy was already deceased by then...and probably dumped at the site.

    Now...it will be interesting if the crime technicians were able to extract any dirt or mud off the tires of whatever car was used to transport Nancy's body (if in fact BC is the perp). Cause a development that was just 'cut' for roads would be all dirt. And if there had been any dew or condensation then car tires should have picked up some of that same dirt, and possibly the undercarriage of the vehicle, depending. I look forward to hearing if any of that kind of evidence exists, as well as any shoe prints, tire prints, etc, etc.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,766
    Great points SG.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    283
    AND what kind of mother would betray their child's confidence in sharing that information, endanger their child's job and their child's employer's reputation by blabbing that information?
    But, you did say something about the poster here. And if you remember the whole post, this part is covered.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,778
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    yes he probably did. I believe Nancy was already deceased by then...and probably dumped at the site.

    Now...it will be interesting if the crime technicians were able to extract any dirt or mud off the tires of whatever car was used to transport Nancy's body (if in fact BC is the perp). Cause a development that was just 'cut' for roads would be all dirt. And if there had been any dew or condensation then car tires should have picked up some of that same dirt, and possibly the undercarriage of the vehicle, depending. I look forward to hearing if any of that kind of evidence exists, as well as any shoe prints, tire prints, etc, etc.
    See my thread "The car"

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast