Those Compelling Reasons for Silence

New Posts

R

roseofsharon

Active Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
2,851
Reaction score
9
In my own opinion ... I am barely able to give CA the benefit of the doubt, however, the only scenario I can think of that would silence her may be the fact that she was involved together with someone in a homicide and the only way that other person can be assured she won't talk is to hold Caylee hostage. Has it been absolutely proven that the decomposition DNA is that of precious Caylee? JB stated there were compelling reasons, but again, is this just another lie to buy more time.
 
roseofsharon said:
In my own opinion ... I am barely able to give CA the benefit of the doubt, however, the only scenario I can think of that would silence her may be the fact that she was involved together with someone in a homicide and the only way that other person can be assured she won't talk is to hold Caylee hostage. Has it been absolutely proven that the decomposition DNA is that of precious Caylee? JB stated there were compelling reasons, but again, is this just another lie to buy more time.
Click to expand...

Very very interesting theory. That would make sense as to why GA was telling the press that the body in the trunk was not that of Caylee.

The hair DNA came back as Caylee but no word on the decomposed tissue from what I understand.

IMHO, it will all be Caylee's DNA. Though that theory you brought up is very intriguing!!!
 
I think in the end that makes this case the most difficult for me. We cannot truly know. Maybe we will never know....it is not likely we will know until the conclusion of the trial.

I hope she is still alive and in a safe place mentally and physically.
 
Exactly....Someone helped her.

Someone she is afraid of.........
 
roseofsharon said:
In my own opinion ... I am barely able to give CA the benefit of the doubt, however, the only scenario I can think of that would silence her may be the fact that she was involved together with someone in a homicide and the only way that other person can be assured she won't talk is to hold Caylee hostage. Has it been absolutely proven that the decomposition DNA is that of precious Caylee? JB stated there were compelling reasons, but again, is this just another lie to buy more time.
Click to expand...

The thing is, I just can't see that other murderer person just holding a child indefinitely so the mother won't talk. Would they enroll her in school eventually? Pay for her wedding? There's no statute of limitations for murder, so they'd have to keep her till she grew up -- or longer.
 
So............. Casey doesn't talk and ends up spending 17 years in jail - do these people then just keep Caylee and raise her like their own????
 
Come on guys! this is not a movie. this is not hollywood nor universal studios. There is no conspiracy. no drug deal gone bad. no babysitter. no job. and certainly not any other body (unfortunately) in that "dam car.!"
Casey is not that smart! She purposely or accidentally hurt Caylee and unsuccessfully tried to lie and cover it up. That's all there is to it.
 
manatee said:
Come on guys! this is not a movie. this is not hollywood nor universal studios. There is no conspiracy. no drug deal gone bad. no babysitter. no job. and certainly not any other body (unfortunately) in that "dam car.!"
Casey is not that smart! She purposely or accidentally hurt Caylee and unsuccessfully tried to lie and cover it up. That's all there is to it.
Click to expand...
I tend to agree with this.
I do believe that the DNA was conclusively tied to Caylee and that it was decomposing.
 
Cagney said:
I tend to agree with this.
I do believe that the DNA was conclusively tied to Caylee and that it was decomposing.
Click to expand...

I sincerely don't think the FBI would dirty there hands or there opinions if they weren't sure it was Caylee.
 
cheko1 said:
I sincerely don't think the FBI would dirty there hands or there opinions if they weren't sure it was Caylee.
Click to expand...

I agree I think it is very clear Caylee has died and that she was in the trunk.

:angel::angel:​
 
manatee said:
Come on guys! this is not a movie. this is not hollywood nor universal studios. There is no conspiracy. no drug deal gone bad. no babysitter. no job. and certainly not any other body (unfortunately) in that "dam car.!"
Casey is not that smart! She purposely or accidentally hurt Caylee and unsuccessfully tried to lie and cover it up. That's all there is to it.
Click to expand...

Well said:clap:

Don't you think she would have talked already....she'll be in prison the rest of her life..... she'd rather leave Caylee in the hands of murderers??
 
AutomaticAuttie said:
Please read this it's just one of many

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/20/local/me-dna20
Click to expand...

the dna evidence is "just one of many" other factors that point to the evidence that Caylee is gone. Sorry to say.
Also, unless it is a research article contesting the DNA evidence credibility, what an expert says they beleive is not sufficient evidence. Did this expert conduct a study and have it published in a reputable peer reviewed journal or did these experts just come up with their own unpublished data analysis?
So my question in what journal what this information published that the los angeles times was quoting? I did not see a reference.
 
A thought occurred to me that perhaps Casey had some help in disposing of the body. Maybe she knew someone she could trust and told them what happened, and they did the deed for her, or at least helped her.
Naaaaaahhh... that's too simple.
 
Rose Mom said:
Well said:clap:

Don't you think she would have talked already....she'll be in prison the rest of her life..... she'd rather leave Caylee in the hands of murderers??
Click to expand...

oh yea, and don't forget she can say anything because she will put Caylee's life at risk. But of course, Cindy wants us to go find Caylee and take her away from these dangerous people. That makes no sense which means to me that it is all fabrication.
 
TxLady2 said:
A thought occurred to me that perhaps Casey had some help in disposing of the body. Maybe she knew someone she could trust and told them what happened, and they did the deed for her, or at least helped her.
Naaaaaahhh... that's too simple.
Click to expand...

Don't poo hoo that thought , she could have coerced anyone of her "partners" to help her...
 
STEADFAST said:
The thing is, I just can't see that other murderer person just holding a child indefinitely so the mother won't talk. Would they enroll her in school eventually? Pay for her wedding? There's no statute of limitations for murder, so they'd have to keep her till she grew up -- or longer.
Click to expand...


When I still believed that Caylee was alive, my theory was that Casey had been involved or witnessed a murder and in order to protect her daughter, sent her into hiding with someone that she trusted and knew they'd take good care as long as was necessary, even permanently.
 
AutomaticAuttie said:
I really think people should do some more research on DNA testing!
Click to expand...

Do a pubmed search on DNA. You will come up with thousands of hits. It has been heavily researched and supported by the literature in very reputable journals. It is considered science. It has freed many on death row.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 79 more.
Total: 3,807 (members: 80, guests: 3,727)

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
3,727
Total visitors
3,807
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,671
Messages
17,957,299
Members
228,584
Latest member
Vjeanine
Back
Top