cacnotcam
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 788
- Reaction score
- 0
Ok. I cannot find the link for the life of me, but while watching the 20/20 special from Friday, they replayed that very early in the case interview with JG. This interview, IIRC, was very early on in the case. While speaking, he referred to Caylee in the past tense (i.e. something like she was....." then very quickly changed it to "she is....." Just struck me as odd, being that it was so early in the investigation, that he would speak of her as if he knew that she was gone. I am just thinking out loud here. Was wondering if anyone else had caught that or if it had struck anyone else as odd.
I'm saying it means anything....Just had to put it out there as food for thought. My grandpa has been gone for well over a month, and I still catch myself saying "he is...." then have to quickly change it to "he was...." The complete opposite of what I saw JG doing.
Thoughts?
(If this isn not the right place for this thread, my apologies!)
I'm saying it means anything....Just had to put it out there as food for thought. My grandpa has been gone for well over a month, and I still catch myself saying "he is...." then have to quickly change it to "he was...." The complete opposite of what I saw JG doing.
Thoughts?
(If this isn not the right place for this thread, my apologies!)