09-10-2008, 01:25 PM #1
Seeking Key Info 6/10-6/14 for New Leads
OK. Since, the last, independently verified sightings of Caylee were on 6/15, there's plenty of attention being focused on the events post-6/15.
I propose that there's valuable information to be gathered from the period 6/10-6/14 that could yield a break, or at least some new leads.
*Per Ricardo's statement, Caylee's last night @ Glenwood Apt was 6/9.
*Per Kristine's statement, Caylee played @ Lake Underhill 6/12 or 6/13 6-8:30PM
*Per Clint's statement, Caylee was @ Tony's Apt on the afternoon of 6/13.
*Per multiple statements, Caylee NEVER spent the night @ Tony's Apt.
I propose that there MAYBE an error in the affidavit narrative (see below)
From original affidavit narrative:
It was he [Tony] that contacted Amy H. and had her call me regarding this case. Anthony said while the defendant lived with her* since June 9th, she [Casey] mentioned several times that Caylee was with the “nanny” at Disney, Universal Studios or the beach. She never gave him any indication the child was endangered or missing.
*[speculation that this is an error and should read, “him” (i.e. “lived with Tony since June 9th”.]
IF you buy that Casey moved into Tony's 6/9...THEN Casey came up with her new, secret location to stow Caylee for the nights 6/10-6/14 (apparently w/o noticeably harming her) OR someone (e.g. George & Cindy) isn't being truthful about knowledge of Caylee's overnight whereabouts.
Could there be evidence (e.g. photo's, video, sightings, receipts, apartment/rental house viewings, etc.) during the period of 6/10-6/14 that is being overlooked due to focus on post-6/15 that could yield important leads to where Caylee might have been that may still hold evidence?!?!
09-10-2008, 01:37 PM #2Former Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
That's interesting since it mentions that June 9th date again--I wonder why Casey holds this date as significant? I've always wondered why Cindy never elaborated about what the circumstances were when she had Caylee visit her father on Father's Day--did Casey bring Caylee back home, was Caylee with the Grandparents alone, or some other scenerio? Cindy also stated she had last seen Caylee on June 9th--before she corrected herself with the Father's Day date. Somehow that June 9th date must mean something.
09-10-2008, 01:46 PM #3
IMHO, synchronizing the Casey move-in with Tony date to 6/9 makes quite a few things fall into place.
09-10-2008, 01:49 PM #4
09-10-2008, 02:00 PM #5
09-10-2008, 02:05 PM #6
09-10-2008, 02:06 PM #7"WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"
A quote spray painted on the wall by search
and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.
What I post are my opinions only.
09-10-2008, 02:16 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
This is what I have been saying forever, that she must have begun leaving her in the car overnight from June 9th to June 15 and I wanted to know where she parked her car while at Tony's, where did she keep Caylee's clothes? How did Cindy get her for the day on June 15th and how did they end up back at the house on the 16th?
So many questions.
09-10-2008, 02:17 PM #9
I agree that they all took off with the June 9th date. However, Casey stated numerous times that she hadn't seen her daughter in 31 days. If you count from July 16th backwards then wouldn't the 31 days mean the 15th of June? The numbers don't add up for the 9th, kwim? I think Cindy chose the 9th based on it being a Sunday and Casey didn't correct her.
I think that is why LE is focusing on these dates. I think (MOO) that the 31 days is the only truth Casey actually put forth. I believe she knows exactly the date she last saw Caylee.
Like I said this is all just my own speculation and opinion.
Last edited by Insomnia Momma; 09-10-2008 at 02:19 PM. Reason: to add info
09-10-2008, 02:25 PM #10Former Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
And while what happened prior to the 15th-16th is important, the 15th is the last day we know that Caylee was still alive.
09-10-2008, 02:32 PM #11
09-10-2008, 02:33 PM #12
OK, OK. The disagreement 6/15 vs. 6/9 and motives for it has been beaten to death, IMHO. ther_beatingA_Dead Not that it isn't an interesting topic...
My intent here was really to focus on something that I don't think is getting the same level of scrutiny - albeit understandably - and yet, might yield some new & helpful information or evidence.
The byproduct of the 6/9 vs. 6/15 debate is benefitting the Anthony's (whether intentional or not) by shifting focus away from 6/10-6/14 which holds some crucial clues - again, and as always IMHO.
09-10-2008, 02:36 PM #13
09-10-2008, 02:40 PM #14Former Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
09-10-2008, 02:42 PM #15
By sillybilly in forum Crimes in the NewsReplies: 22Last Post: 08-23-2014, 05:21 PM
By hambirg in forum Crimes-Spotlight on ChildrenReplies: 90Last Post: 01-31-2014, 11:17 AM