1475 users online (247 members and 1228 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 80
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    28

    From LP, No Lie Dector Tests??

    for the whole family?? To clear them for the FBI?? How screwed up is that?? They all know something.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Shelton CT
    Posts
    52
    No Defense attorney in the country is going to allow there client to take a polygraph test. There is no reason to, they are not admissible in court.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    1,232
    The Anthonys didn't have a defense attorney at the time. They are guilty of something.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,492
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalie61 View Post
    No Defense attorney in the country is going to allow there client to take a polygraph test. There is no reason to, they are not admissible in court.
    Many defense attorneys have their clients take one for their own use. They are private and not released to law enforcement unless it shows their client innocent.

    There is NO reason GA & Cindy should not take one.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalie61 View Post
    No Defense attorney in the country is going to allow there client to take a polygraph test. There is no reason to, they are not admissible in court.
    I am not a lie detector fan at all. We learned how to administer them in college in the Physio Psych class and I was the subject. I failed miserably. The problem is I was being truthful.
    I would never recommend that anyone take one.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    411
    LP said that GA and CA agreed but then Lee said no is that right? Why would that be I wonder, because he knows more than he is letting on? He seemed like he really wanted to find Caylee at first in the calls but now I dont see that from him . I am wondering if Casey did tell him the truth after all

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    173
    It sounds like GA and CA were willing but Lee put a stop to it. My bet would be she told him something BIG. My question is, why is LP letting info out one drip at a time? I'm very glad he is telling what he knows but all at once would be really helpful. I would like to see Lee questioned by the LE. Maybe he isn't made of stone like his sister.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    176
    They were bluffing when they said, the first time it was mentioned, they would take the lie detector tests. When their bluff was called they gave the answer they planned to give.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    205
    I don't know if still available, but back in the beginning of this case when I first started wathching NG ... It was clearly stated that Casey offered a lie detector test [before she even had her current attorney] ... Suddenly that's not the case anymore.

    Don't get me wrong, it's evident she would not have passed, but it was mentioned and offered on her behalf ... according to earlier reports from NG show.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    805
    Quote Originally Posted by brians_babe View Post
    for the whole family?? To clear them for the FBI?? How screwed up is that?? They all know something.
    Where is info from? Link?


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,292
    Quote Originally Posted by LorinMarie View Post
    LP said that GA and CA agreed but then Lee said no is that right? Why would that be I wonder, because he knows more than he is letting on? He seemed like he really wanted to find Caylee at first in the calls but now I dont see that from him . I am wondering if Casey did tell him the truth after all
    Why would Lee say "NO" if GA & CA agreed at first??

    Who knows anymore!!!! They ALL know the truth...
    Judge Stan Strickland "God didn't set Casey free - a jury did"

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,027
    Since Casey is such a practice liar who does not seem capable of feeling emotion for her daughter missing, I would not trust a lie detector to be useful with her, imo she would be the kind of person who could pass one with flying colors even tho she could be guilty as sin. If she did that then it would be used with the public as showing she is innocent.

    VB
    Boyfriends and girlfriends are not Babysitters.
    Just because you want to be with somebody does not mean they will take care of your children.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by GizzySmith View Post
    Where is info from? Link?
    the link is from LP on nancy grace!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    411
    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Seeker View Post
    Why would Lee say "NO" if GA & CA agreed at first??

    Who knows anymore!!!! They ALL know the truth...
    I could be wrong that was the impression I got from LP. I am up in the air on GA and CA and what they know but I do think that Lee may know exactly what really happened to poor baby Caylee. MY 8 year old was asking me about Casey tonight and I had an age appropriate talk with her about the "bad mommy" that was really hard for me to do

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Quote Originally Posted by dalli'smom View Post
    the link is from LP on nancy grace!!
    can you link it?

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Access To FBI Lab Tests May Be Denied
    By liltigress in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 10-21-2008, 03:04 PM