At the bottom of this page you'll see "Chris wrote at 3:33am on March 5th, 2008" with Chris S. picture and phone number. Chris listed his number on this web page so Adam could put it back in his phone directory.
"text xxx-xxx-xxxx if you don't have mine... that will be easier" I may be interpreting this wrong...but I thought Adam is saying "hey, in case you don't already have my number, here it is. You text me....it will be easier for me than calling each person and getting this info." Perhaps I better do more sleuthing??
I forgot to add that this number xxx-xxx-xx90 is Officer Charlie in Casey's cell phone. It is the #9 entry on her phone directory. (handwriten page number 905 in pdf document dated 8/19/08 Nokia GSM, Nokia 2610 2626 2008-08-19(001)) That may be another clue to work with.
I am positive I got this info here at Websleuths (As far as the number belonging to Officer Charlie.) Unfortunately, I cannot find that post where people were tracing down the phone numbers in Casey's cell phone now.
I am finding the Casey called this # on 6/2/2008 1:10:22 PM
I am finding the Casey called this # on 6/15/08 at 2:39 pm.
I am finding that Office Charlie text message Casey 7/16/2008 4:32:29 PM "What happened to caylee?
Would just like to point out that in the 7/30/08 Police interview with Christopher S. on about the second page of the interview:
YM: Okay. Uh, met her I guess while you guys were playing football?
cs: Yeah (affirmative), a bunch of friends, we would get together at Deerwood
Elementary and play football and she came down to visit one of her friends,
which is an acquaintance with me, and we ended up getting to talk.
YM: What was that person's name? Do you remember?
CS: Uhm,there's a couple of them she knew. Adam L., Matt (spelling), and I
beleve that was it right there.
YM: And you guys met uh, I guess sometime last year you guys started to date? Is that right?
CS: Yeah (affirmative), We were friends and then we decided to kind of take it up a notch.
Just another verification that Casey knew Adam.
ABC provided $200,000.00 toCasey Anthonys defense!The MURDERED should not be USED to pay for the MURDERERS DEFENSE!
American Tragedy: The defense of Casey Anthony.
Juror No. 11 somehow made the journey from Casey is the one on trial to George may be a murderer, based on how George acted on the stand? 3 years of evidence against Casey and he throws George under the bus. Makes sense?What evidence indicated that George might be a murderer? Anyone?Weren't they to ONLY consider EVIDENCE?This NOT GUILTY verdict throws Caylee right back into the swamp she decomposed in. Thanks to this "impartial" jury.
Have we seen an interview from Kristina?