View Poll Results: Do You Believe T.E.S. found Caylee in their Search?

Voters
838. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes.

    194 23.15%
  • No.

    401 47.85%
  • I can't decide.

    243 29.00%
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789101112 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 287

Thread: Who Thinks T.E.S. Found Caylee?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    2,909
    I think they found someone, and verification is needed.
    I think the family has been notified and was that Sunday.
    I think the gp talked to their pastor about it, b/c he mentioned gratitude for "time to come to grips with it"
    Where did LA run off to?
    jmo

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    436
    One of the things that I have been thinking about it is how police try to keep secret the locations they clear because they don't want the killer/killers going back to the already cleared area and disposing the body there.

    So perhaps they did find some forensic evidence there but they will not be going back either? This is a very highly publicized case and the locations the police is looking are known by the public (NOT ALL).

    There is also a possibility there are MORE THAN ONE dumping sites. One for the body one for other evidence. It is definitely strange how it was called off during the day with 1000 volunteers there and with the weather and ground conditions definitely better than previous days. So perhaps the LE were focusing on other leads? Got a good tip for another area???

    I don't know if the found Caylee, but logic says the way the search was ended that day and the excuse given is not the most convincing one.

  3. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueEyedSpy View Post
    I think they found something to do with another case, quite possibly Trenton's remains, but no, not Caylee's.
    I'm with you - it wasn't Caylee, and I'm not even convinced TES found anything yet...

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    WASHINGTON
    Posts
    1,265
    Quote Originally Posted by Chezhire View Post
    I'm with you - it wasn't Caylee, and I'm not even convinced TES found anything yet...
    I couldn't agree more!
    "What you see and hear depends a good deal on where you are standing: it also depends on what sort of person you are." - C.S. Lewis

  5. #55
    missscarlett's Avatar
    missscarlett is offline Miss Scarlett in the Library with the Revolver...
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St. Joseph, Missouri
    Posts
    58
    I voted undecided because while I don't think they actually found a body, I do believe SOMETHING was found in order for them to halt their investigation the way they did.
    ANTHONYS IN CASEYLAND

    "I think you might do something better
    with the time...than waste it in asking
    riddles that have no answers."

    --Alice in Wonderland

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    651
    No or it would have been in the media by now.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    943
    I am undecided. It was odd the way that TES pulled out. Was it due to the Anthonys placing pressure on them to stop looking for a dead Caylee or was it truly what they said it was.

    I don't know. I just hope that this case does not turn out to be like the Trenton Duckett case. 2 years later and still no Trenton.
    This OPINION is MINE. There are MANY like it, but this one is MINE.

    I reserve the right to at any time.

    Want to know what all the hip, environmentally friendly babies are wearing this year?
    Check out Nana's Natural Nappies for the best choices in cloth diapering and accessories.
    Natural and organic products are available for mom, too!
    10% discount on all orders over $50 during grand opening. US only.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    576
    Undecided. I believe they may have found something significant though. I read something about one of the searchers claiming to have had a "productive" day and that the area they searched was then roped off by LE. Whether that was a rumor or not, I don't know.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    807
    No.

    I did at first, but there has been enough time for preliminary results to have come in.

    IMHO... they would have notified the family by now.....even if LE held Caylee's body a while for testing....word would have leaked.

    Also Casey won't be charged even if the body is/was found until LE has a solid case against her... also IMO as always.
    JMO, IMOO, JMHO

    "Caylee's either coming home, or she's already gone home." (Richard Grund)

  10. #60
    I think TES left in a hurry because they are from Texas and they had to prepare for the hurricane.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by 100%Agave View Post
    I am undecided. It was odd the way that TES pulled out. Was it due to the Anthonys placing pressure on them to stop looking for a dead Caylee or was it truly what they said it was.

    I don't know. I just hope that this case does not turn out to be like the Trenton Duckett case. 2 years later and still no Trenton.
    IMO... I dont think Tim Miller would allow to A's to influence his search efforts especially when LE has been so supportive to his team.

    I too hope this is resolved soon and doesnt turn out to be another Trenton Duckett case. Very sad situation there

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    609
    I know when they find someone's remains that they must notify family members, but if they haven't ID'd the remains yet, do they have to notify the family of the possibility before testing is performed?

    I've thought all along that EquuSearch found something. They pulled out much too mysteriously, IMO. Tim also seemed to go a bit easier on Cindy. That of course could have just been his nature, but could it be that he knew that Caylee was dead, and knew Cindy would take the news hard?

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by lostnfound85 View Post
    Since they have already determined that the body in the trunk of the car was Caylee's, finding the body is a moot point as far as arresting her. If the body is found, it is very unlikely as this point it will yield any forensic evidence as far as cause of death. It would probably provide more evidence as to what happened when. So while providing closure for the family, finding the body is not of that much importance to the legal case against Casey.
    The only way I see finding a body adding to a criminal case against KC is that the actual body would remove some aspects of reasonable doubt pertaining to whether or not Caylee is still alive. I agree that the body won't yield much, if anything, in forensic evidence. I just feel like if they find and identify a body the conversations and debates with regard to this case will be different. There would be no more "Is she or isn't she alive".

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    237
    Quote Originally Posted by Gram2 View Post
    I think TES left in a hurry because they are from Texas and they had to prepare for the hurricane.
    I believe that they left before it was known that Hurricane Ike would be headed for the Texas coast.

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    609
    Quote Originally Posted by melissa311 View Post
    The only way I see finding a body adding to a criminal case against KC is that the actual body would remove some aspects of reasonable doubt pertaining to whether or not Caylee is still alive. I agree that the body won't yield much, if anything, in forensic evidence. I just feel like if they find and identify a body the conversations and debates with regard to this case will be different. There would be no more "Is she or isn't she alive".
    I agree, unless they find some sort of blunt force trauma. I don't expect they will, but that's the only exception I can think of.

    I read, in Florida, if a child dies due to aggravated child abuse, it is indeed considered murder. On Nancy Grace the other day, several attorneys stated if Casey used the chloroform to sedate Caylee so she could party, that too would be murder 1 if she happened to die from it (perhaps searches on the computer could prove that).

    In a nutshell though, while I don't think the remains will necessarily prove cause or manner of death, I think it is likely that they could get a murder conviction; as opposed to manslaughter, etc... I know a lot of people don't believe it's a possibility, but I sure do.

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Angelo, Texas
    Posts
    62
    I do believe they found "something". Just a hunch, but the search was called off under strange circumstances. Very unusual-

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Just outside of Austin
    Posts
    436
    I believe that they left before it was known that Hurricane Ike would be headed for the Texas coast.
    Didn't they call off the search early Sept? Like within the first week of Sept? I am in TX and while yes, we were watching it, no one was "preparing" for Ike that far ahead.

  18. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by BZY247 View Post
    I think they found something critical to the investigation, but, I do not think it's little Caylee.
    I agree, I am not sure it would even be legal to have found a body and not release that information to the Anthony's.

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,685
    No, I don't think so. The remains belong to KC not to LE. They are only allowed to keep them as long as it takes to identify them and then they have to release to family. Can't sit on it. They also have to expedite identification. They may be able to hold onto longer if need to do forensics but they have to id first and notify family and then they can continue with their testing etc. Plus, according to reporter, TES said they were coming back regardless. Why would they come back to search for Caylee if they had already found her? Maybe they identified what they believe is Caylee but had to halt the search for the reasons they indicated-high water levels, etc. Remember Tim said that he didn't want any boats or other vehicles running over the body. JMHO

  20. #70
    Right SoCal, there are laws concerning this and no way could they keep the body this long with out notifiying the family

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    609
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCalSleuth View Post
    No, I don't think so. The remains belong to KC not to LE. They are only allowed to keep them as long as it takes to identify them and then they have to release to family. Can't sit on it. They also have to expedite identification. They may be able to hold onto longer if need to do forensics but they have to id first and notify family and then they can continue with their testing etc. Plus, according to reporter, TES said they were coming back regardless. Why would they come back to search for Caylee if they had already found her? Maybe they identified what they believe is Caylee but had to halt the search for the reasons they indicated-high water levels, etc. Remember Tim said that he didn't want any boats or other vehicles running over the body. JMHO
    Didn't it take a month to ID Laci Peterson's remains? I don't think the amount of time that's in question here is long enough to be able to say conclusively one way or the other.

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by NancyT View Post
    Didn't it take a month to ID Laci Peterson's remains? I don't think the amount of time that's in question here is long enough to be able to say conclusively one way or the other.
    I don;t think it's been long enough either to ID anything appropriately. Is it possible that LE could notify the Anthony's but not release the info to the public just yet?

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    5,135
    Quote Originally Posted by NancyT View Post
    Didn't it take a month to ID Laci Peterson's remains? I don't think the amount of time that's in question here is long enough to be able to say conclusively one way or the other.

    I think it was less than a week to identify Laci and Conner, but my memory is a bit hazy now.....
    Check out updated daily: Tricia's Tidbits

    Some days I feel like a tumbleweed blowing in the wind....


  24. #74
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    609
    Quote Originally Posted by gigi331 View Post
    I don;t think it's been long enough either to ID anything appropriately. Is it possible that LE could notify the Anthony's but not release the info to the public just yet?
    I think that's definitely a possibility. We know, the Anthonys would NEVER inform the public if that turns out to be the case.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    609
    Quote Originally Posted by TopGunner View Post
    I think it was less than a week to identify Laci and Conner, but my memory is a bit hazy now.....
    I was trying to run some google searches a couple weeks back and I couldn't find anything conclusively, but it seemed to me it took longer than I ever realized at the time.

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789101112 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Should Public Petition Caylee a Guardian to make decisions once she's found?
    By KOOL LOOK in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-07-2008, 06:12 PM
  2. Body found - NOT Caylee
    By KaylynnCouture in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 92
    Last Post: 08-29-2008, 12:44 AM
  3. IF... Caylee is found alive...
    By newtv in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-19-2008, 10:35 PM
  4. Sheriff thinks Caylee is dead
    By hinkymeter in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-13-2008, 10:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •