09-21-2008, 12:10 AM #1
"Taken a month ago, by a person by the name of Zany"
Wow I have read this set of documents several times and just realized in his police report George says this exact line!
Not her nanny Zeniada or her Nanny Zany or her nanny we all call Zany but a "PERSON BY THE NAME OF ZANY."
This is VERY telling, this sounds to me like he knows nothing of ANY nanny.
I don't think this has been mentioned before and maybe we need to start a George's inconsistancey thread?
BYW Cindy's police report does not even mention the Nanny or the Nanny's name or who took her just that she discovered finnaly after finding Casey that Caylee is missing.
I would think knowlege of a Nanny would be important news to provide officers at this time, they seem to have NO knowlege to offer just information given them by Casey.
09-21-2008, 12:33 AM #2
GA is former LE. his whole statement is written very professionally. i think that is why he said it like that...
but it is still an interesting observation.
09-21-2008, 12:43 AM #3
I like how he crossed off all the blanks lines, he CERTAINLY does not want anyone comming back at him for false information! and was protecting himself from anyone adding more information in the empty lines!
09-21-2008, 12:54 AM #4
I think you may be on to something there!
I tested this on my 17 year old daughter, who's not absorbed with this case like I am. Without her knowing what I was referring to I simply asked, "If I said to you 'a person by the name of Joe' what would you know about this person?" She replied, "Joe is someone you don't know and really don't know anything about."
When I asked for more clarification, she used this as an example: When she started working she would tell us when Logan, her supervisor, had scheduled her to work. As we began to refer to Logan regarding her schedule, though we had not yet met him, we had a "familiarity" with him, if you will. I would speak to her as if I knew him (i.e. "Did Logan schedule you for Friday?"), and would speak to others as if I knew him (i.e. "Logan, her supervisor, scheduled her for Friday.").
On the other hand, tonight she got a bizarre voicemail which was a wrong number. She described the caller as, "'Some person named Holly' who was looking for tickets to Wicked for her mom." My daughter does not know a Holly and does not have any idea about tickets to Wicked.
All this to say, I think that statement definitely sounds like George is clueless about any nanny named Zany. Good catch!!
09-21-2008, 01:06 AM #5
09-21-2008, 01:13 AM #6
I don't think George ever heard of Zanny and I don't think Cindy did either. I believe Cindy is very gullible when it comes to Casey, and that Casey was able to convince Cindy she'd mentioned Zanny's name to her...."Remember Mom, Zanny -- she's the one with the puppy. Remember Caylee talking about playing with the puppy?"
Or at least that's what I did think, until Jesse said tonight that Casey started talking about Zanny back in November. (Or February)
09-21-2008, 01:20 AM #7
09-21-2008, 01:23 AM #8
why don't you change the title of this thread to George's inconsistencies?
09-21-2008, 01:26 AM #9
09-21-2008, 01:26 AM #10
09-21-2008, 01:27 AM #11
09-21-2008, 01:38 AM #12Former Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
09-21-2008, 02:32 AM #13
I re-watched the Geraldo Video and he did say november, but only the name Zany he never related or knew of any other name. But lets leave that on the Geraldo interview thread for now this one regards George...
09-21-2008, 08:56 AM #14<Click on User CP>
Scroll down and on the left
<Click on Edit Ignore List>
In add a Member to your list
<start typing the name of the person you want to ignore>
<Click on OKay>
IF WE COOK IT THEY WILL COME!
09-21-2008, 10:58 AM #15
I remember the first time I read the docs, I think George also said something to the effect of "I have not see my grandaughter or heard her voice since June 9th" Not a direct quote because I am not pulling it all out again to find it, but it was something like that. Not only, oc course, do we have the problems with the date, but I remember the first time I read it thinking how very specific George was being and how it seemed to me he had started covering his butt right fromthe beginning and knew something was up. If I really believed the nanny story, I wouldn't think to cover my butt because I wouldn't be worried about my own possible connection to the suspect. I think George knew the suspect was going to be his daughter because he didn't buy that story either.
By Casshew in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat NewsReplies: 5Last Post: 02-04-2011, 02:33 PM
By White Rain in forum Crimes-Spotlight on ChildrenReplies: 21Last Post: 07-16-2010, 01:21 PM
By White Rain in forum Up to the MinuteReplies: 82Last Post: 03-28-2008, 10:43 AM