09-29-2008, 11:41 PM #1
Release of information Act - Did Anyone break the law in some released information?Snipped the following from state of florida website. Form this PDF regarding release of information:correctional and correctional probation officers,......."
"Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. Paragraph (d) of subsection (4) of section 119.071, Florida
Statutes, is amended to read:
119.071 General exemptions from inspection or copying of public records.—
(4) AGENCY PERSONNEL INFORMATION.—
(d)1.a. The home addresses, telephone numbers, social security numbers,
and photographs of active or former law enforcement personnel, including
Some of Casey's friends that they have released information from are former law enforcment and they released phone numbers and address no?
here is the root page for the Florida Law
the laws are what everyone follows the statutes are what are used to procecute someone for breaking the laws.
Again here are the statutes:
And this is just the root page for all of it:
Last edited by JBean; 09-30-2008 at 01:21 AM. Reason: fix title
09-29-2008, 11:46 PM #2
Part of the problem is much of the personal info was redacted with a highlighter. ..well not really but it may as well have been one.
09-29-2008, 11:52 PM #3
09-29-2008, 11:52 PM #4
It's not as though OCSO didn't attempt to "black out" information. Ultimately SOME addresses, ss#'s etc could be seen on the documents though.A Mother's love is a lifelong commitment
09-29-2008, 11:55 PM #5
09-29-2008, 11:56 PM #6
09-29-2008, 11:57 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- "Deep in the Heart"
09-30-2008, 12:02 AM #8
Releasing personal information of former policemen can be very detrimental to that individual well beyond the complications of identity theft.
We are protecting ZFG's right to sue in her case against Casey, but what about the rights of these individuals?
These people could come to harm if they ever were involved in any serious arrests with nefarious individuals wishing to do exact revenge.
Granted they never realized how far this information would get on the good ole internet and it was a mistake and they never meant for the media to spread it across the country like water but they did release it none the less sloppy as it was.
09-30-2008, 12:04 AM #9
09-30-2008, 12:06 AM #10
And how are WE exactly protecting ZG's right to sue?
Last edited by MD MOMMY; 09-30-2008 at 12:09 AM. Reason: added textA Mother's love is a lifelong commitment
09-30-2008, 12:06 AM #11
09-30-2008, 12:12 AM #12
Regardless of any of it, if that is the law, it is the law and it is a good one in my opinion. Someone should be held accountable.
09-30-2008, 12:13 AM #13
It gives me a break trying to read through all the new docs.
Well it was a general we, as in me and those similarly doing so. The we I refer are the ones here that are defending her position to sue. Allthough I do not believe she will win I do believe she has a right to sue. Even though on that same note we must defend Casey's rights as well in that there does not appear to be a statute in place for ZG to win a case, In some of "we's" opinions.
09-30-2008, 12:17 AM #14
I see what you are saying and yes it sucks for them but like anyone else if they have issues they can most definitely seek counsel. I doubt we will be seeing one former member of LE suing anyone as I'm pretty sure he could be charged with something for his stunt, when he lied to LE not once but twice.
And JG has been plastered all over the press so his case would likely be down the tubes IMO. BUT agreed it is their right to sue over this if the law allows it.A Mother's love is a lifelong commitment
09-30-2008, 12:25 AM #15
By kathyn2 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 568Last Post: 09-06-2008, 12:38 AM