849 users online (126 members and 723 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 27 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 398
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,813

    Who is the accomplice?

    Nancy Grace commented last evening on the wording of the indictments - the way they are worded makes it sound like someone else could have been involved. Nancy said she even went and looked to see if the wording in the indictments was just "standard wording" in Florida, and that it was NOT standard wording.

    Could this be the boyfriend, Tony who was in the car with her the day of the stolen gas cans? The day Tony picked her up from the dumpster?

    Or could it be brother Lee who refuses a polygraph and advises his parents not to take polygraphs after they have agreed to do so voluntarily?

    George? Cindy? Who???

  2. #2
    I still think LA is involved in this-either during or after the fact. His refusal to give a DNA sample and lie detector test just reinforces this in my mind.

  3. #3
    I will have to go back and listen to NG again because I must have missed this. There was speculation that it was a rumor, I think, because of the indictment itself not yet naming her.
    "WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
    THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
    AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"

    A quote spray painted on the wall by search
    and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.



    What I post are my opinions only.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    483
    IMO? Someone that uses chloroform in his line of work.

    Someone that lives or works near the airport.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,592
    I'm seriously waiting to see if something comes of this. I still keep thinking there is another party here.

    If so, Casey won't talk and rat them out because it will prove her guilt, and an accomplice can easily lie now saying he/she didn't realize what Casey was doing. No one will believe Casey so anyone could stand up with some verifiable information that will place Casey in the chair.
    Bitter are the tears of a child: Sweeten them.
    Deep are the thoughts of a child: Quiet them.
    Sharp is the grief of a child: Take it from him.
    Soft is the heart of a child: Do not harden it.
    ~Pamela Glenconner~

  6. #6
    It COULD be just about anyone involved...but one thing is certain, I DO believe she had some kind of help-not necessarily with disposing of Caylee, but perhaps some "deletions" and "erasures" and "disappearing acts" of some incriminating evidence...

    ABC provided $200,000.00 to
    Casey Anthonys defense!
    The MURDERED should not be USED to pay for the MURDERERS DEFENSE!

    American Tragedy: The defense of Casey Anthony.

    Juror No. 11 somehow made the journey from Casey is the one on trial to George may be a murderer, based on how George acted on the stand? 3 years of evidence against Casey and he throws George under the bus. Makes sense?
    What evidence indicated that George might be a murderer? Anyone?
    Weren't they to ONLY consider EVIDENCE?
    This NOT GUILTY verdict throws Caylee right back into the swamp she decomposed in. Thanks to this "impartial" jury.

  7. #7
    Fandy's Avatar
    Fandy is offline Polite & Interested Newbie, if I don't ask, I'll never know!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    northeast coastline
    Posts
    623
    I dunno about Ms. Nancy lately....she is getting just too dramatic for me to take her word as gospel. I will fence-sit on this one until I hear some further confirmation on this Bombshell...
    Keeping the Litterbox Clean! (these are not my cats, they are generic~mine are much cuter)!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    652
    I don't think it could be TL for the simple fact that I don't think he cared enough about her to do anything so crazy. She was the one obsessing over him, while he seemed to be tiring of her being around all the time.

    I do think that LA may know something. His refusing polygraph & DNA doesn't sit right with me at all. I just don't understand what the motive would be if it were not that he had something to hide.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by magic-cat View Post
    It COULD be just about anyone involved...but one thing is certain, I DO believe she had some kind of help-not necessarily with disposing of Caylee, but perhaps some "deletions" and "erasures" and "disappearing acts" of some incriminating evidence...

    My thought's exactly ! I believe that she had "after the fact" accomplices and I do think that Cindy is one of them for sure. I don't think that she admitted to Cindy what she did but, Cindy knew and took it upon herself to cover-up evidence... I'm not so sure about George or Lee at this point though.

  10. #10
    I don't know. Part of me thinks she did this whole thing alone, and the other part thinks she had help. I don't think it was help by anyone in the Anthony family, though, and I don't think it was AL either. I wonder if there is some other person that we just don't know about that could have been helping her. KC seems to have many different lives.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Warner Robins GA
    Posts
    79

    Accomplice

    Here's what I know for fact. from the 1st of June until the 15 of July she only talke to Lee on one day. and it was a flury of calls from 1am - 3:30isham.

    I also know that KC had upwards of 8 - 10hrs per day of off time from her personal cell phone.

    just strange to me that brother and sister would only make cell contact 1 time in a month and a half and this contact is from 1 - 3am in the morning.

    I'm thinking that if Lee isn't involved in Caylee going missing he's involved with providing KC with some type of employment or cell phone.

    This also strikes me in her phone call with him when she's in jail. you remember the "coded one"

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    26
    I would be very interested to see LA's cell phone pings for the past few months...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,548
    The indictments might be written to reflect another person just in case she gave the baby to someone that would do harm just to cover bases. This is if the the defense side tries to and creates reasonable doubt with someone else killing the child, putting her in the trunk, and subsequently distracting Casey from smelling it or pasting dead squirrels under the car until they could remove the body in the middle of the night at the tow yard. Obviously if someone else did this, and she gave the child away to them or let her be taken away without notifying someone for 31 days the indictment would cover that scenario. <<<I can think like a ridiculous Anthony family member>>

    As everyone probably knows, I think the only other person involved is possibly Lee because I strongly suspect he is the father of Caylee.

    When Lee asked her in the released jail call, "is this like last time?" and she responded "absolutely"; it leads me to believe there is a lot more to the story and I believe this scenario is the only one that explains everything.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    10,698
    Quote Originally Posted by Broderick View Post
    When Lee asked her in the released jail call, "is this like last time?" and she responded "absolutely"; it leads me to believe there is a lot more to the story and I believe this scenario is the only one that explains everything.
    Broderick - I don't remember reading this "is this like last time?" question from Lee to KC. I'm sure I'm on information overload - Can you please tell me where I can find that or post a link???

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    249
    I think that if she had an accomplice that it had to be Lee. His refusal to take a polygraph, strange conversations with Casey in jail, absence since she was charged, tthe list of strange behavior goes on and on.

Page 1 of 27 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Accomplice?
    By MBK in forum Jaycee Lee Dugard
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-03-2009, 09:37 PM