658 users online (80 members and 578 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NW, INDIANA
    Posts
    607

    What discovery does the defense have to turn over to prosecutors

    If there is a thread about this please delete this thread.
    I figured we have talked about what the prosecutors have, but what do you think the defense has to turn over?

    I personally dont think they have anything thats in black or white. Of course I'm wondering if the list that casey was to follow for 30 days will appear?

    What wittness do you think the defense will have for casey other than cindy?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    flush flush
    Posts
    1,401
    - A LOT of expert witnesses to poke holes in the DNA and other physical/scientific evidence, chain of custody etc.

    - Maybe some of the people who claim to have had a "Caylee Sighting"

    Hmm. it's interesting to think about... I wonder who else...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL area
    Posts
    2,406
    I think the defense has to turn over a list of witnesses, evidence, etc. that they have and will use in Casey's defense to the prosecution. If JB is going to put Jane Doe on the stand to say, as part of the defense theory, that she saw the toddler gang grab Caylee, he has to turn her name over to the prosecution so they can check her story out. If JB is going to use that alleged picture of Casey, Caylee and the Nanny that the PI went to check out - they must turn over a copy of it to the prosecution and I think they have to give them all the info about it - when it was taken, who they got it from, etc. I am sure one of our more knowledgeable legal people will let me know how close I am to being right - or wrong
    Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.
    Euripides

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Macushla View Post
    I think the defense has to turn over a list of witnesses, evidence, etc. that they have and will use in Casey's defense to the prosecution. If JB is going to put Jane Doe on the stand to say, as part of the defense theory, that she saw the toddler gang grab Caylee, he has to turn her name over to the prosecution so they can check her story out. If JB is going to use that alleged picture of Casey, Caylee and the Nanny that the PI went to check out - they must turn over a copy of it to the prosecution and I think they have to give them all the info about it - when it was taken, who they got it from, etc. I am sure one of our more knowledgeable legal people will let me know how close I am to being right - or wrong

    You're right. None of JB's motions were groundbreaking in anyway. As I saw it, he was simply asking for things that were going to be given to him anyway. It's like watching Joe Pesci in My Cousin Vinny.

    But yes, if they try and use the "picture" they will have to provide all pertinent info so Pros. can follow up on it. The Free-Flow of Information.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,042
    Quote Originally Posted by Macushla View Post
    I think the defense has to turn over a list of witnesses, evidence, etc. that they have and will use in Casey's defense to the prosecution. If JB is going to put Jane Doe on the stand to say, as part of the defense theory, that she saw the toddler gang grab Caylee, he has to turn her name over to the prosecution so they can check her story out. If JB is going to use that alleged picture of Casey, Caylee and the Nanny that the PI went to check out - they must turn over a copy of it to the prosecution and I think they have to give them all the info about it - when it was taken, who they got it from, etc. I am sure one of our more knowledgeable legal people will let me know how close I am to being right - or wrong
    You're doin great!!! I can't tell if your question is about the photographs or not so if it isn't...just disregard please.

    Florida discovery in a criminal case mandates the defense turn over:
    (iii) any tangible papers or objects that the defendant intends to use in the hearing or trial.

    once they are into the discovery exchange. (FL Rule Crim Pro 3.220)

    As to the details about a photograph, those would come in as testimony in attempting to lay a foundation to get the particular photo admitted into evidence.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,042
    Not what we think of a traditional discovery, but under the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, this can also be ordered of the defendant as part of the exchange of discovery, per Rule 3.220:

    (c) Disclosure to Prosecution.
    (1) After the filing of the charging document and subject to constitutional limitations, the court may require a
    defendant to:

    (A) appear in a lineup;
    (B) speak for identification by witnesses to an offense;
    (C) be fingerprinted;
    (D) pose for photographs not involving re-enactment of a scene;
    (E) try on articles of clothing;
    (F) permit the taking of specimens of material under the defendantís fingernails;
    (G) permit the taking of samples of the defendantís blood, hair, and other materials of the defendantís body
    that involves no unreasonable intrusion thereof;
    (H) provide specimens of the defendantís handwriting; and
    (I) submit to a reasonable physical or medical inspection of the defendantís body.


    Should be interesting...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Other End
    Posts
    25,761
    I personally don't think the defense has anything of value.. Maybe it's because I think Casey is so guilty that nothing can sway me otherwise. Just the fact she didn't report Caylee missing, Cindy did, a month later, is very telling to me. Her lies are another.


    This post is my opinion only, and is subject to making me look totally confused

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL area
    Posts
    2,406
    Quote Originally Posted by MiraclesHappen View Post
    You're doin great!!! I can't tell if your question is about the photographs or not so if it isn't...just disregard please.

    Florida discovery in a criminal case mandates the defense turn over:
    (iii) any tangible papers or objects that the defendant intends to use in the hearing or trial.

    once they are into the discovery exchange. (FL Rule Crim Pro 3.220)

    As to the details about a photograph, those would come in as testimony in attempting to lay a foundation to get the particular photo admitted into evidence.
    Miracles: If the defense did try to enter a photo into evidence, they would have to have someone testify as to where it came from etc., correct? Would they have the PI testify or would they have to prodcue the person who took the photo?

    I don't think there is a photo I put this in here because I don't want someone to misread this and get a whole new rumor started about a photo
    Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.
    Euripides

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,042
    Quote Originally Posted by Macushla View Post
    Miracles: If the defense did try to enter a photo into evidence, they would have to have someone testify as to where it came from etc., correct? Would they have the PI testify or would they have to prodcue the person who took the photo?

    I don't think there is a photo I put this in here because I don't want someone to misread this and get a whole new rumor started about a photo

    Macushla, You are`on a roll.

    They can put the photo into evidence (also not saying they actually have a photo!!!!!!) without the person who actually took it.


    The important part is that it is what it is.

    The key words to lay a foundation for a photo are usually something like,
    It is a "Fair and Accurate Representation of fill-in-blank.



    Florida Law would say:
    90.901 Requirement of authentication or identification.--Authentication or identification of evidence is required as a condition precedent to its admissibility. The requirements of this section are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.

    Sorry it took so long. I was bumped...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southeast US
    Posts
    2,244
    Probably just a short witness list, a few photos and videos of Casey with Caylee. I can't think of much at all they can bring to the table.



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    20,003
    Quote Originally Posted by nancy botwin View Post
    - A LOT of expert witnesses to poke holes in the DNA and other physical/scientific evidence, chain of custody etc.

    - Maybe some of the people who claim to have had a "Caylee Sighting"

    Hmm. it's interesting to think about... I wonder who else...
    Probably those who can attest to the fact that Casey was a good mother.



Similar Threads

  1. 2010.12.22 Prosecutors Call for Sanctions Against the Defense
    By Dignity4Victims in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 431
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 08:30 AM
  2. Prosecutors New Motion for Private Meeting w/Judge but w/out Defense #2
    By TakeNote in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 268
    Last Post: 02-26-2010, 06:56 PM
  3. 2010.02.11 Defense objection to discovery schedule
    By The World According in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-19-2010, 09:34 PM
  4. Casey defense team wants tough questions asked of prosecutors??
    By jmfstl in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 11:15 PM
  5. Casey Anthony's defense wants prosecutors removed
    By GirlinCentralFL in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 143
    Last Post: 02-01-2009, 06:40 PM