762 users online (105 members and 657 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 103
  1. #1
    JusticeorJustUs's Avatar
    JusticeorJustUs is offline Sometimes there's Justice. Sometimes there's just us.
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sitting corrected in Tennessee. :D
    Posts
    324

    Will Cindy and George's Behavior Affect Their Employability?

    ...do you think CA, GA or LA are even employable at this point, much less have jobs waiting for them?

    I find it hard to imagine anyone either keeping them on as employees or hiring them, given the outrageous behavior, lies, etc.


    I can't help but think this is why the attempt to discredit TM and EquuSearch.

    Deep down they know future employment is not a possibility, perhaps?
    Last edited by JBean; 11-02-2008 at 06:07 PM. Reason: edit title and removed remark
    If the Anthony's said "Good Morning" to me passing on the street I'd have to run home and go to bed because surely it would be night time.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Somewhere out there.
    Posts
    3,892
    Well, GA is working, so I don't see a problem there. CA is a nurse and nurses are in high demand so I'm sure she could find work somewhere if her company didn't allow her to come back. I can't picture her company firing her over this though, because I'm sure she would sue them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,862
    Quote Originally Posted by tiredofthis View Post
    Well, GA is working, so I don't see a problem there. CA is a nurse and nurses are in high demand so I'm sure she could find work somewhere if her company didn't allow her to come back. I can't picture her company firing her over this though, because I'm sure she would sue them.
    If either them get arrested & convicted they might not work in their choosen profession again. Each state has strict guidelines for keeping your license.

    I would not hire her. Given what I have seen of her, she does not appear to be stable enough to render patient care. Maybe she is, but she has made herself look unstable.

    I also would not hire her to manage a health care agency where she does the business end & isnt involved in direct patient care. She would have access to personal health info, SS numbers, insurance info & might even do billing & collect payments. Given the speculation around the funds donated to Caylee' s funds, & her own personal money mess, I probably would think twice. I haven't seen her use good judgement & have seen her only think her thoughts matter, the law be damned. Would she really respect the HIPPA laws??

    I would not hire her to do private home health. Again for many of the reason stated above but also b/c most of those who need home health are easy picking s for those who are less than honest.

    I ask myself, would I trust her enough to be alone in my home as a house keeper or pet sitter? NO, so why would I trust her with all my private info & health care needs.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Somewhere out there.
    Posts
    3,892
    Quote Originally Posted by LeLe1953 View Post
    If either them get arrested & convicted they might not work in their choosen profession again. Each state has strict guidelines for keeping your license.

    I would not hire her. Given what I have seen of her, she does not appear to be stable enough to render patient care. Maybe she is, but she has made herself look unstable.

    I also would not hire her to manage a health care agency where she does the business end & isnt involved in direct patient care. She would have access to personal health info, SS numbers, insurance info & might even do billing & collect payments. Given the speculation around the funds donated to Caylee' s funds, & her own personal money mess, I probably would think twice. I haven't seen her use good judgement & have seen her only think her thoughts matter, the law be damned. Would she really respect the HIPPA laws??

    I would not hire her to do private home health. Again for many of the reason stated above but also b/c most of those who need home health are easy picking s for those who are less than honest.

    I ask myself, would I trust her enough to be alone in my home as a house keeper or pet sitter? NO, so why would I trust her with all my private info & health care needs.
    True. If CA and GA are convicted down the road it might be an entirely different story.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by tiredofthis View Post
    Well, GA is working, so I don't see a problem there. CA is a nurse and nurses are in high demand so I'm sure she could find work somewhere if her company didn't allow her to come back. I can't picture her company firing her over this though, because I'm sure she would sue them.
    Where is George working now? Last I saw anything about him working was Cindy saying the company he was supposed to start working for, somewhere around July 15/16 when this case started, hadn't been been 'able to hold his job for him'.

    That aside, for employability, I think any employer would be hesitant about what media-covered hysteria they might bring along with them, not to mention for Cindy especially, hysteria and lying just in the day to day work environment.

    Even slinging french fries, an employer does think about impact to customers, and impact to other employees in terms of the ability of other employees to be productive.

    I've done a lot of hiring. I wouldn't be able to hire any of them for any position.

    - George - physical violence towards a little old lady (lol), extreme anger/temper

    - Lee - lack of respect of other's property to the point of destroying it, lying (telling the dog protester woman that LE had said she'd have to leave), manipulative behavior (telling the dog protestor woman that the home owners assoc filing was just sitting on a desk awaiting imminent sign off and then no protestors would be allowed there)

    - Cindy - chronic lying, unwillingness to acknowledge lying, lack of remorse about lying, hysteria, self preserving attitude to the point of total disregard of the needs and rights and well being of others, significant paranoia, inability to identify and act on what's best for those close to her... I could go on and on and on. I couldn't even put her in a position where she didn't interact with others because I would still not be able to count on her for basically anything. For her trained profession, nursing, there is no way in hell I'd entrust the care of somebody with so much as a splinter to her. Scary!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    165
    GA works for Walt Disney World doing Security. It has been mentioned on the news here a few times.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    MD 'burbs of Washington DC
    Posts
    5,900
    As long as they are not charged with anything and hold no criminal record that points to their character being questionable: their lies and stories probably would not have any bearing on their getting employed. As long as they have kept their noses clean and have a good work history and can show excellent skills in regards of what they are applying for: they will be good to go.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,862
    Quote Originally Posted by Elphaba View Post
    As long as they are not charged with anything and hold no criminal record that points to their character being questionable: their lies and stories probably would not have any bearing on their getting employed. As long as they have kept their noses clean and have a good work history and can show excellent skills in regards of what they are applying for: they will be good to go.
    It would matter to me. If I had 2 people, equal qualifications, apply for the same job, I would not hire the Anthony. ESP in nursing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Feel free to discuss their employability on an intelligent level.

    But if this turns into a bashing thread, we already have plenty.
    Thanks everyone.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    75
    I am in nursing school and I wouldnt let that woman touch me. She is exact opposite of what nursing is about. It is actually scary to think she is a nurse. Oh my!


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    10,698
    I really don't believe that she was working as a practicing nurse for some time! I think her job at Gentiva is administrative???

  12. #12
    I think CA's job is admininstrative and I don't see it affecting further employment. However, what could affect it is the media attention this case has already warranted and it could be seen as a definite problem later down the line. The companies or employers may prefer not to invite that into their workplace.

    As far as GA is concerned, I don't believe it will have any affect on him standing outside with a flashlight watching doors or watching security cameras from the inside. Unless his credibility is tanked during trial which would go towards this type of employment or again the media coverage is an issue for the employer...I think he can carry on employment as he seems to be doing.
    "WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
    THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
    AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"

    A quote spray painted on the wall by search
    and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.



    What I post are my opinions only.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Sunny Central Florida
    Posts
    146
    If CA current employer decided to let her go CA could attempt to sue but it would prove to be fruitless because FL is a right to work state. Her employer can let her go for any reason (other than current workers comp case). They don't have to have a reason to let her go.

    In my previous life, I was responsible for hiring for my department. At this time, I wouldn't hire any of the A because of their obvious need to be available for LE, court, etc. I wouldn't even waste my time or theirs interviewing them. Once the trial is over, I doubt I would hire either GA or LA because of the negative impact all of this might bring to the workplace. I know I would not hire CA, in any capacity, to work for me. I would have trust issues with her. I would not be able to trust her perception of things.

    In a nursing capacity, CA is a walking liability. I don't care how scarce nurses are throughout the country. If she encounters one patient that disagrees with her treatment and knows who she is, her employer is going to find themselves in court.

    All of them are too big of a risk.

    BeagleMom

  14. #14
    JusticeorJustUs's Avatar
    JusticeorJustUs is offline Sometimes there's Justice. Sometimes there's just us.
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sitting corrected in Tennessee. :D
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by BeagleMom View Post
    If CA current employer decided to let her go CA could attempt to sue but it would prove to be fruitless because FL is a right to work state. Her employer can let her go for any reason (other than current workers comp case). They don't have to have a reason to let her go.

    In my previous life, I was responsible for hiring for my department. At this time, I wouldn't hire any of the A because of their obvious need to be available for LE, court, etc. I wouldn't even waste my time or theirs interviewing them. Once the trial is over, I doubt I would hire either GA or LA because of the negative impact all of this might bring to the workplace. I know I would not hire CA, in any capacity, to work for me. I would have trust issues with her. I would not be able to trust her perception of things.

    In a nursing capacity, CA is a walking liability. I don't care how scarce nurses are throughout the country. If she encounters one patient that disagrees with her treatment and knows who she is, her employer is going to find themselves in court.

    All of them are too big of a risk.

    BeagleMom
    <<My bold>>

    The trust issues are exactly what I was getting at.

    But in my case I'm afraid it would apply to all three of them.

    The entire lack of honesty and cover-up mentality, the inability to even recognize the truth, much less tell the truth would disqualify them in my book.

    Security and nursing are two fields where honesty is really a priority.
    If the Anthony's said "Good Morning" to me passing on the street I'd have to run home and go to bed because surely it would be night time.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    LI, NY
    Posts
    3,268
    I think someone, somewhere will be willing to employ Cindy.

    If Cindy continues to alienate people and show her very nasty side, the public may very well boycott any company that she's affiliated with... forcing an employer to show her the door.

    Which would of course give her time to finally get off HER a$$ and go search for a "live Caylee" instead of complaining that nobody else is.
    Caylee Anthony = Victim

    Cindy's 911 call: "I found my daughter's car today, and it smells like there's been a dead body in the damn car."


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. George and Cindy in NC
    By jcamille in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 502
    Last Post: 09-04-2011, 04:10 PM
  2. Would you feel differently about Cindy's behavior if?
    By JSR in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 104
    Last Post: 02-12-2011, 05:38 AM
  3. If You Were George and Cindy
    By ShouldBWorking in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 109
    Last Post: 11-17-2008, 11:20 AM