985 users online (207 members and 778 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 101
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    See above ^
    Posts
    596

    Red face K&B Ask for custody order to be sealed


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    1,404
    Quote Originally Posted by RaleighNC View Post
    RaleighNC for SuperSleuther of the day!!!

    I KNEW they were reading us... ha ha ha...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,061
    irreparable damage....
    FOIA........
    APPEAL?????????????? how the heck would THAT work????????????
    As I received information, and relayed it to the defendant after her arrest, she continued to claim ignorance and at times, laughed at the situation. She still failed to show any outward signs of remorse or concern for her missing two year old daughter.
    --Yuri Melich, arrest warrant, July 16, 2008

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    1,404
    I do believe K&B have been participating in the media coverage by posting only the information they wish to share on their website!!!

    Thereby, MOTION DENIED!

    Next...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    That makes no sense.

    We already know temp custody stays with the Rentz/Lister families. We already know that the judge found reason(s) to keep the kids in Canada. How that affects the criminal case I don't know; unless Sasser is releasing forensic results in HER ruling (which of course she isn't and can't) then { yawn..}. We've already seen the depos, read the affys. Big whoop. Or as SNL's Aunt Linda would say, "Whaaaaat?? Oh brother. "

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    That makes no sense.

    We already know temp custody stays with the Rentz/Lister families. We already know that the judge found reason(s) to keep the kids in Canada. How that affects the criminal case I don't know; unless Sasser is releasing forensic results in HER ruling (which of course she isn't and can't) then { yawn..}. We've already seen the depos, read the affys. Big whoop. Or as SNL's Aunt Linda would say, "Whaaaaat?? Oh brother. "
    I'm surprised they haven't whined about that grumpy looking mugshot actually. He looks pretty unpleasant.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    Quote Originally Posted by raisincharlie View Post
    I'm surprised they haven't whined about that grumpy looking mugshot actually. He looks pretty unpleasant.
    I've seen much worse (Nick Nolte, anyone?). Brad didn't look at the camera; that's the only issue as far as I can tell. Don't they get "do-overs?" Even the driver's license bureau will allow one do-over.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    745
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    I've seen much worse (Nick Nolte, anyone?). Brad didn't look at the camera; that's the only issue as far as I can tell. Don't they get "do-overs?" Even the driver's license bureau will allow one do-over.
    When working on locating folks for a class reunion, I went online to the local law enforcement site of my hometown. Not only did I find some classmates, I had a grand ole' time checking out their mugs. Some had changed quite a bit since they were 17 years old....especially in pix taken probably in the early AM while drugged out or intoxicated. Needless to say, NOT the most flattering portraits. Hee Hee.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    I do wonder why K & B keeps harping on Chief Bazemore though. Once Nancy was identified and the status of missing was changed to homicide the Chief had a presser or two but refused to discuss the case, even telling the press there would be no further comments about it.

    Prior to that time she was defensive of Brad, refusing to answer if Brad was at HT at 4 am. Good thing she had the good sense to not name a POI or suspect aye ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,436
    Everyone wave hello to K&B



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    I wondered that too, RC. Bazemore was as closed-mouthed about this case as anyone could be and still admit there was actually a murder. Contrast her comments with a multitude of other LE jurisdictions across the country. Her officers wouldn't comment on ANYTHING wrt this case. Not one peep. And Bazemore said nothing excep the standard, "we are pleased with our efforts...blah, blah, blah."

    I think they're using this as a test case to see what they can get sealed. Because on the face of it, there isn't much in a judge's temp ruling that is going to harm or prejudice their client, IMHO. Most of the public at-large doesn't read legal documents anyway. We do on this board, but even then, not everyone bothers because it can be tedious. He11, the average member of the public doesn't understand half of what they read even in a simple news article.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    Everyone wave hello to K&B
    and wave hello to Sandlin & Davidian too! They were co-counsels, with Debbie Sandlin taking the lead on the defense.

    Lynn Prather: no hard feelings; you still have fabu cheekbones, seriously! If this whole legal thing doesn't pan out consider becoming a cosmetics model--Chanel could probably double the sales of their blushes.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    I wondered that too, RC. Bazemore was as closed-mouthed about this case as anyone could be and still admit there was actually a murder. Contrast her comments with a multitude of other LE jurisdictions across the country. Her officers wouldn't comment on ANYTHING wrt this case. Not one peep. And Bazemore said nothing excep the standard, "we are pleased with our efforts...blah, blah, blah."

    I think they're using this as a test case to see what they can get sealed. Because on the face of it, there isn't much in a judge's temp ruling that is going to harm or prejudice their client, IMHO. Most of the public at-large doesn't read legal documents anyway. We do on this board, but even then, not everyone bothers because it can be tedious.
    That is what is so silly to me about it - the majority of people in the area where this occured probably don't even care. The news goes in one ear and out the other. Few if any will read the documents in reality, some of the posters here don't even read them. The majority of posters here have 0 possibility of ever being on a jury for this case since we live out of state, even out of country. This is what is silly to me.

    I think the real aim is at Nancy's friends, They don't want them to know anything since they may have to testify in the criminal trial. Would like to know why K & B when deposing them felt the need to ask of them what they told LE. Guess we know why actually.

    But expecting Detective Daniels to tell them why he said what he said is ummmm crazy and trying to imply he has no foundation to say is is even crazier.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    791
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    He11, the average member of the public doesn't understand half of what they read even in a simple news article.
    Why does that hit me as odd on the eve of elections
    All comments IMHO, etc etc

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    Quote Originally Posted by maconrich View Post
    Why does that hit me as odd on the eve of elections
    I don't know, especially when one party is focusing on "Joe Sixpack" and "Joe the Plumber." Same constituents available for jury duty in this or any case, on average. Most juries are not made up of Ph.Ds. and Rhodes Scholars, just your average citizen, carefully selected by jury consultants and matching as close as possible to an optimal profile.

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-29-2010, 04:51 AM
  2. Temporary Custody Order Published
    By RaleighNC in forum Nancy Cooper
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-21-2008, 11:35 PM