RaleighNC
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 0
That makes no sense.
We already know temp custody stays with the Rentz/Lister families. We already know that the judge found reason(s) to keep the kids in Canada. How that affects the criminal case I don't know; unless Sasser is releasing forensic results in HER ruling (which of course she isn't and can't) then { yawn..}. We've already seen the depos, read the affys. Big whoop. Or as SNL's Aunt Linda would say, "Whaaaaat?? Oh brother. "
I'm surprised they haven't whined about that grumpy looking mugshot actually. He looks pretty unpleasant.
When working on locating folks for a class reunion, I went online to the local law enforcement site of my hometown. Not only did I find some classmates, I had a grand ole' time checking out their mugs. Some had changed quite a bit since they were 17 years old....especially in pix taken probably in the early AM while drugged out or intoxicated. Needless to say, NOT the most flattering portraits. Hee Hee.I've seen much worse (Nick Nolte, anyone?). Brad didn't look at the camera; that's the only issue as far as I can tell. Don't they get "do-overs?" Even the driver's license bureau will allow one do-over.
Everyone wave hello to K&B
I wondered that too, RC. Bazemore was as closed-mouthed about this case as anyone could be and still admit there was actually a murder. Contrast her comments with a multitude of other LE jurisdictions across the country. Her officers wouldn't comment on ANYTHING wrt this case. Not one peep. And Bazemore said nothing excep the standard, "we are pleased with our efforts...blah, blah, blah."
I think they're using this as a test case to see what they can get sealed. Because on the face of it, there isn't much in a judge's temp ruling that is going to harm or prejudice their client, IMHO. Most of the public at-large doesn't read legal documents anyway. We do on this board, but even then, not everyone bothers because it can be tedious.
He11, the average member of the public doesn't understand half of what they read even in a simple news article.
Why does that hit me as odd on the eve of elections :bang: :wave:
Actually I believe it is Sandlin who filed this motion and not K & B.
The latest update from WRAL says however that Kurtz is filing a motion for bond.
Actually I believe it is Sandlin who filed this motion and not K & B.
The latest update from WRAL says however that Kurtz is filing a motion for bond.
... LOVEly!
I'm sure the neighbors will be pleased!!
Both Sandlin & Prather signed, so it's coming from both firms I think.