868 users online (139 members and 729 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 112
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    See above ^
    Posts
    596

    Judge issues restraining order to not let BC sell assets

    Interesting...

    http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/3939917/


    It's also interesting that they are asking for "support" for expenses, etc. perhaps it's just posturing by the attorneys, but it seems rather odd that they would WANT to continue to be that linked to him.

    I guess with the temporary custody order - it's reasonable.

    I can't believe that he's still employed and they are still paying him. Amazing - just exactly what do you have to do to get fired?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    Thanks, Raleigh!

    I'm thinking this is in preparation for a wrongful death suit (in addition to continued support of his children).

    I too can't believe he is still on the CSCO payroll; wondering if someone can verify that info for us?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    965
    I think this is a legitimate request............regardless of the outcome of the trial, he still has an obligation to his children financially and selling off assets (most likely to pay his attorneys) is taking away money for those girls. No matter what he did ......he is still a father and should provide and protect their future. If he isn't thinking of them then someone needs to make him.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    147
    The only thing I disagree with the statement about him not having living expenses therefore the girls should get all his money. I assume his house, cars and other bills are not paid off and therefore, he still has expenses even though he is locked up. Those bills still have to be paid regardless.

    He should be forced to pay whatever the standard child support payment is for NC. In Texas, for 2 kids - it is 25% of your NET income. Not sure what the formula is in NC.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    Quote Originally Posted by RaleighNC View Post
    Interesting...

    http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/3939917/


    It's also interesting that they are asking for "support" for expenses, etc. perhaps it's just posturing by the attorneys, but it seems rather odd that they would WANT to continue to be that linked to him.

    I guess with the temporary custody order - it's reasonable.

    I can't believe that he's still employed and they are still paying him. Amazing - just exactly what do you have to do to get fired?
    Poor fella can't catch a break. So Ms. Stubbs believes he had a plan for his family to sell his possessions - hmmmm. Wonder if he had a plan to help take care of his kids, seeing as how his check didn't clear to help pay for the agreed portion of travel and expenses. All that money he liked so well, tied up now.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    They must have gotten notification of some assets being disposed of already. Did you read the motion, RC? In it they state he has been 'wasting' assets (don't know what this is in reference to) and are asking for all receipts for sale of any assets over $200 since July 16, 2008.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    They must have gotten notification of some assets being disposed of already. Did you read the motion, RC? In it they state he has been 'wasting' assets (don't know what this is in reference to) and are asking for all receipts for sale of any assets over $200 since July 16, 2008.
    I did read the documents. Perhaps Nancy's wedding ring really wasn't at the jewelers ? We do know the diamond pendent is in the possession of LE along with a few other pieces of jewelry. We also know the house was partially packed so... could be any number of things he has "wasted".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by raisincharlie View Post
    I did read the documents. Perhaps Nancy's wedding ring really wasn't at the jewelers ? We do know the diamond pendent is in the possession of LE along with a few other pieces of jewelry. We also know the house was partially packed so... could be any number of things he has "wasted".
    Perhaps $12,000 for an unnecessary psych eval? And whatever he has been paying K&B? And he probably is paying for his parents' lving expenses as well. Is his father still here?
    As I received information, and relayed it to the defendant after her arrest, she continued to claim ignorance and at times, laughed at the situation. She still failed to show any outward signs of remorse or concern for her missing two year old daughter.
    --Yuri Melich, arrest warrant, July 16, 2008

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Star12 View Post
    Perhaps $12,000 for an unnecessary psych eval? And whatever he has been paying K&B? And he probably is paying for his parents' lving expenses as well. Is his father still here?
    A PI too don't forget. Dunno Star -but he sure has rung up a bill and in doing so the Rentz's have as well. Considering he now sits in jail, I suspect they are entitled to re-coup their costs from him instead of letting him pith it away or give it away.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    It's kind of ironic that he's even concerned about what's left of his assets now since his isn't likely to be leaving jail/prison ever again. I guess it's the last thing he could (try to) control. I'm sure he was quite pissed at seeing that motion come through. It was fax'd to him at the jail.

    Also, another thought: if he was busy disposing of assets immediately on/around July 16th and over the next few weeks, it would make you wonder why he needed to liquidate. A custody battle is one thing, but why was he preparing to dispose of his assets? Would a man who had nothing to do with his wife's murder need to start asset disposal?

    Wonder when the WD suit will be filed...cause you know it's coming.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    408
    What right does Cisco have to fire BC? Perhaps he is on administrative leave where he collects a portion of his salary only. Cisco is certainly treating this situation as "innocent till proven guilty" in my opinion.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    It's kind of ironic that he's even concerned about what's left of his assets now since his isn't likely to be leaving jail/prison ever again. I guess it's the last thing he could (try to) control. I'm sure he was quite pissed at seeing that motion come through. It was fax'd to him at the jail.

    Also, another thought: if he was busy disposing of assets immediately on/around July 16th and over the next few weeks, it would make you wonder why he needed to liquidate. A custody battle is one thing, but why was he preparing to dispose of his assets? Would a man who had nothing to do with his wife's murder need to start asset disposal?

    Wonder when the WD suit will be filed...cause you know it's coming.
    Fleeing the USA ?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,078
    Quote Originally Posted by Albert View Post
    What right does Cisco have to fire BC? Perhaps he is on administrative leave where he collects a portion of his salary only. Cisco is certainly treating this situation as "innocent till proven guilty" in my opinion.
    The part where he's not showing up for or available to work might be an issue for them.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    16,856
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    The part where he's not showing up for or available to work might be an issue for them.
    According to Ed Crump who spoke with Cisco this pm - Brad's continued employment is under review. Way at the end:

    http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?se...cal&id=6500347

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    408
    Quote Originally Posted by SleuthyGal View Post
    The part where he's not showing up for or available to work might be an issue for them.
    That is why I said 'administrative leave'. Not really sure if this applicable but why else would he still be collecting a paycheck?

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. What if the new Judge Perry issues a gag order?
    By sassy_texasbelle2 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 12:31 AM
  2. Lois & The Restraining Order
    By pirate in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-14-2009, 08:45 AM
  3. Judge issues gag order in Ramsey case
    By dark_shadows in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-06-2006, 05:08 AM
  4. Restraining Order Romance
    By mysteriew in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-30-2005, 12:17 AM