12-08-2008, 08:04 PM #16Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
12-08-2008, 08:18 PM #17---------------------------------------------------
Avatar: What else can be said after they name the "NFL Man of The Year Award" after him?
"I have been driven many times upon my knees by the overwhelming conviction that I had nowhere else to go. My own wisdom, and that of all about me, seemed insufficient for the day."-Abraham Lincoln
"The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor." -Vince Lombardi
12-08-2008, 08:53 PM #18
This is just all too preposterous!
12-10-2008, 05:05 AM #19
There's a lot of behind the scenes paperwork going on. This was on myorangeclerk.com re: KC Case Actions
12/9/2008 A STATE' S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENSE WITNESS LIST (COPY OF DEFENSE WITNESS LIST ATTACHED - EXHIBIT A)
and today also:
12/9/2008 A AMENDED STATE WITNESS LIST FILED
Maybe we will get that tomorrow....the humble opinion of Jo Schmo...0 number of Days Jury Deliberated for Caylee
12-10-2008, 05:41 AM #20
The position he and the Anthonys are taking is illogical--if they are prying "clues" out of KC to track down a kidnapper--necessary because of the allegeded threat to family--how can they square getting "clues" and not the whole story from the start to find her? If there are kidnappers involved, why would it make any difference if the woman-child led them to them through clues or by being honest with every detail? It's ludicrous in my view and plays on the sentiments of the public who can't stand the idea of a little one like Caylee being so cruelly treated.
It makes us sick to ponder such.
We know it is a charade devised through the logical progression of conversations between family with this reckless, child bearer. She looked for leads from mom and let it go on and on--until the mom believes it. Manipulation accomplished to avoid the biggest "mistake" in the woman-child's life--that is taking the life of another human being.
JB does not have any revelation to use at trial. Logic dictates that if there were, LE would have been provided such and the case resolved months ago.
12-10-2008, 07:31 AM #21
Baez was on the Geraldo show Sunday night, then on the Today Show, and yesterday was on 'The Best Defense' with Jamie Floyd on TruTv. He must have already prepared for the pre-trial hearing because he has made these rounds on TV shows. He surely does not seem worried about it, even tho these pre-trial hearings are just formalities.
Now he says Casey is 100% innocent. Casey is possibly facing life in prison. You would think he would just stay in his office, shut up, and work on the defense he is going to present at trial. UNLESS there has been some sort of plea deal.
12-10-2008, 09:54 AM #22
12-10-2008, 10:09 AM #23Inactive
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
I googled but couldn't find a simple explanation.
Thanks in advance!
12-10-2008, 10:42 AM #24Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
GA told KC that if it was because the family was threatened, they could all go into protective custody. That would be a blessing (imo) for this family, they will never have their lives back if they keep their identities. IF (and I don't believe for a second it's true) but IF there was a kidnapping, then you get LE's help, get Caylee, and go into hiding. End of story, baby is back home safe and sound, the A's all get to rebuild lives, and maybe even GA gets a job he can't be fired from via witness relocation.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I seriously doubt that ruthless kidnappers would spare lives because KC is giving clues and not specifics. Just doesn't make sense..
Amy’s entry to Casey on Facebook:"Amy Huizenga (Orlando, FL) wrote
at 8:18am on May 26th, 2008
You lost my duct tape! I was excited to have so much left! Thats why I get for giving you my purse… Stupid costume that didn’t work the way it should have…. what a waste of gaff tape…"
Did police ever ask Amy what brand of duct tape???
12-10-2008, 10:57 AM #25
12-10-2008, 11:13 AM #26
12-10-2008, 11:23 AM #27
We need to see the actual motion to know its basis. People get creative in criminal law, too.
The prosecution might be alleging that JB has failed to comply with his mandated discovery obligations. The rules providing for release of information by the prosecution to the defense, are a 2 way street in Florida.
If JB has failed to disclose any matters which are mandated by Rule 3.220 governing discovery,
or if JB has blocked mandated discovery in any way,
the prosecutions' response is going to be a "hardball" tactic like this.
Good for them!
We really need the motion, though.
The prosecutors are dealing with this situation per JB's witness list:
(7) expert witnesses who have not provided a written report
and a curriculum vitae or who are going to testify to test results or give opinions that will have to meet the test set
forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
(from Category A witness definition)
Defense also per the discovery rule, has to provide this:
(ii) reports or statements of experts made in connection with the particular case, including results of
physical or mental examinations and of scientific tests, experiments, or comparisons; and..
We need the motion but if you saw a motion to strike the witnesses then yes, it is to prevent their testimony, period.
This is only a guess without viewing the motion but there is a possibility it is based on JB';s failure to provide mandated information under his discovery obligations to the State.
Had he not created such a personally hostile environment, which is different than an adversarial proceeding by nature, there might have been an exchange of courtesy phone calls, instead of this .
jmho along with wild speculation
12-10-2008, 11:26 AM #28
I gave it a shot, Capri, but we need a copy of the motion.
Actually, we need the criminal rules of procedure amended to include automatic filing of motions, by opposing sides, in a timely fashion, in the WS documents thread, to facilitate discussion.
Is that asking too much.
12-10-2008, 12:16 PM #29
12-10-2008, 12:46 PM #30
By ketel0ne in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 29Last Post: 04-09-2010, 04:32 PM
By olive in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 539Last Post: 10-31-2008, 12:13 PM
By Kimmer in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 52Last Post: 08-31-2008, 10:36 PM
By MissHolmes in forum Skyla Whitaker and Taylor PlackerReplies: 19Last Post: 06-28-2008, 12:13 AM