1204 users online (284 members and 920 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 351

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,206

    FBI Investigating Email That Could Land Cindy In Jail #2

    Please continue posting here.
    First thread link: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75578

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    25
    For what it's worth, given what we have at WFTV's link, you can't tell much about the LG email's validity. But while watching the corresponding video, I did a screenshot of what might be the original.



    First, the PDF version seems to be a 'retyped' version, as it seems the original (if it is) is in all CAPS (both LG's and CA's portions). Anyone know if that is typical of either of their communications?

    Second, regarding the 'funky date' in CA's email ("Sent: Fri,202120Nov 2008 6:18am"), I'm not sure exactly how it could happen, but "20" is the "hex code" for the "space" ASCII character. (You see this a lot in your web browser, when it encodes unsafe characters in URLS as %20). If this is what happened, I think we can assume the CA email was sent to LG on Fri, Nov 21.

    Third, if this photo is the original, unedited email, it seems it was sent directly to KB of WFTV. But it's interesting (maybe) that it wasn't composed and sent to her directly by LG. LG's email was forwarded to her by someone, and the To: field and name after "Dear" in the greeting is missing.

    I can think of two scenarios for this: 1. LG composed the email but wasn't sure to whom he was going to send it so he hadn't yet filled in that part, then later just forwarded his 'draft', or 2. LG sent this email to someone else who then removed the identifying information when s/he forwarded it to KB.

    So... based on that, it's possible that LG communicated to LE and sent this in confidence to someone, never intending it to make it to the media.

  3. #3
    curiositycat's Avatar
    curiositycat is offline The one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule is a person's conscience
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Northern New Mexico
    Posts
    4,948
    Quote Originally Posted by meta View Post
    For what it's worth, given what we have at WFTV's link, you can't tell much about the LG email's validity. But while watching the corresponding video, I did a screenshot of what might be the original.



    First, the PDF version seems to be a 'retyped' version, as it seems the original (if it is) is in all CAPS (both LG's and CA's portions). Anyone know if that is typical of either of their communications?

    Second, regarding the 'funky date' in CA's email ("Sent: Fri,202120Nov 2008 6:18am"), I'm not sure exactly how it could happen, but "20" is the "hex code" for the "space" ASCII character. (You see this a lot in your web browser, when it encodes unsafe characters in URLS as %20). If this is what happened, I think we can assume the CA email was sent to LG on Fri, Nov 21.

    Third, if this photo is the original, unedited email, it seems it was sent directly to KB of WFTV. But it's interesting (maybe) that it wasn't composed and sent to her directly by LG. LG's email was forwarded to her by someone, and the To: field and name after "Dear" in the greeting is missing.

    I can think of two scenarios for this: 1. LG composed the email but wasn't sure to whom he was going to send it so he hadn't yet filled in that part, then later just forwarded his 'draft', or 2. LG sent this email to someone else who then removed the identifying information when s/he forwarded it to KB.

    So... based on that, it's possible that LG communicated to LE and sent this in confidence to someone, never intending it to make it to the media.
    Thanks for this. I had this feeling also that it was forwarded to someone who then forwarded it to KB.

    Great analysis!
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect" Steven Wright

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    33,681
    Video:

    TEAM COVERAGE: Controversial Email Surfaces As Casey's Attorney Appears In Court

    http://www.wftv.com/video/18146538/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Red Sox Nation
    Posts
    3,588
    I don't know if this has already been posted but I found an old video (link below) re: one of the search warrants carried out at the A's..They took mostly clothes & said "hairbrush & comb", "toothbrushes", & "oral thermometer" were taken into evidence during an earlier search..Would LE retrieve these items themselves or would they ask CA to do it while they were in the home?..That seems very odd to me & now I'm not sure what to think about this whole hairbrush hoopla.


    http://www.abcactionnews.com/mediace...om&navCatId=99

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    33,681
    Quote Originally Posted by amysmom View Post
    I don't know if this has already been posted but I found an old video (link below) re: one of the search warrants carried out at the A's..They took mostly clothes & said "hairbrush & comb", "toothbrushes", & "oral thermometer" were taken into evidence during an earlier search..Would LE retrieve these items themselves or would they ask CA to do it while they were in the home?..That seems very odd to me & now I'm not sure what to think about this whole hairbrush hoopla.


    http://www.abcactionnews.com/mediace...om&navCatId=99
    It's probably easier to ask for those items than to tear the house apart looking for them.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Red Sox Nation
    Posts
    3,588
    Quote Originally Posted by SuziQ View Post
    It's probably easier to ask for those items than to tear the house apart looking for them.
    But shouldn't LE be wise enough to know that procedure can easily lead to what MAY have happened with the hairbrush?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    33,681
    Quote Originally Posted by amysmom View Post
    But shouldn't LE be wise enough to know that procedure can easily lead to what MAY have happened with the hairbrush?
    What is their option? Turning the house upside down looking for this stuff? There are obstruction of justice charges to deter people from doing what Cindy did. IMO, everyone knows when LE, especially FBI, ask for something, you give it to them.

    ETA: LE was also treating the Anthony's as victims and trusted them. They got burned.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,302
    Quote Originally Posted by SuziQ View Post
    What is their option? Turning the house upside down looking for this stuff? There are obstruction of justice charges to deter people from doing what Cindy did. IMO, everyone knows when LE, especially FBI, ask for something, you give it to them.

    ETA: LE was also treating the Anthony's as victims and trusted them. They got burned.
    Not only that but how in the heck is LE supposed to decipher who's hairbrush is who's? Caylee had brown hair, Casey had brown hair..it wouldn't be an easy task to guess at IMO. Not only that but CA and GA had LE fooled into thinking they were actually worried about thier grandaughter and WANTED to help..yeah right.
    A Mother's love is a lifelong commitment
    to selflessness
    .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,761
    Quote Originally Posted by SuziQ View Post
    IMO, everyone knows when LE, especially FBI, ask for something, you give it to them.

    ETA: LE was also treating the Anthony's as victims and trusted them. They got burned.
    To quote a wise and gentle man (who has since been quoted by MN and others), "Everyone who tries to help the Anthonys ends up getting body slammed." Even the FBI! Incredible. Really.

    Martha Stewart went to Federal Prison, not because of what she did, but because she "lied to Federal Investigators."

    If it turns out there's proof that CA or GA have lied to Federal Investigators, then they must be charged. (After Casey's trial, so they can't plead the 5th.)


  11. #11
    sharpar's Avatar
    sharpar is offline If dogs dont go to heaven I want to go where they are
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Home of the Alamo
    Posts
    1,282
    Silly LE they probably thought CA would help them to find her grandaughter since she called them for help .

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    2,405
    Quote Originally Posted by amysmom View Post
    But shouldn't LE be wise enough to know that procedure can easily lead to what MAY have happened with the hairbrush?
    But at that time, they had no reason to think the A's would act any different than other people/parents/grandparents when a child is missing.






    All kinds of hugs!

    ROSIE



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    901
    Quote Originally Posted by amysmom View Post
    But shouldn't LE be wise enough to know that procedure can easily lead to what MAY have happened with the hairbrush?
    I think that early on in this investigation, LE really believed that George and Cindy would do anything to bring back Caylee. I don't think that they thought that G and C might have a plan for skewing the investigation so Caylee is never found. In other words, they did not realize that George and Cindy already knew Caylee was dead and they were going to try and save Casey. I mean, who thinks like that???

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hockeytown!!
    Posts
    788
    Quote Originally Posted by amysmom View Post
    I don't know if this has already been posted but I found an old video (link below) re: one of the search warrants carried out at the A's..They took mostly clothes & said "hairbrush & comb", "toothbrushes", & "oral thermometer" were taken into evidence during an earlier search..Would LE retrieve these items themselves or would they ask CA to do it while they were in the home?..That seems very odd to me & now I'm not sure what to think about this whole hairbrush hoopla.


    http://www.abcactionnews.com/mediace...om&navCatId=99
    Good question. I would assume that they would need to ask about certain items that are not obvious...For example, a child's toothbrush is obvious. A hairbrush is not...They would most likely need to ask what brush Caylee was using, or which one was hers, etc...
    Death Leaves A Heartache No One Can Heal. Love Leaves A Memory No One Can Steal. Rest In Peace Caylee.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Red Sox Nation
    Posts
    3,588
    Quote Originally Posted by cacnotcam View Post
    Good question. I would assume that they would need to ask about certain items that are not obvious...For example, a child's toothbrush is obvious. A hairbrush is not...They would most likely need to ask what brush Caylee was using, or which one was hers, etc...
    That makes sense & if CA really did pull this switch-a-roo under those circumstances (I always thought she was asked to bring it to LE) then it's way worse then I first thought.

Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. MN - Distasteful Mail, Magazine Subscriptions Land Woman in Jail
    By Indy Anna in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-24-2016, 02:12 PM
  2. Killer heels land abused DJ in jail
    By zwiebel in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-10-2014, 06:59 PM
  3. FBI Investigating Email That Could Land Cindy In Jail
    By GirlinCentralFL in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 528
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 11:16 PM
  4. Hanky Panky in cars can land you in jail
    By Casshew in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-28-2004, 11:02 AM
  5. Dog prank could land man in jail
    By Casshew in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-05-2004, 08:52 AM