I am equally as disgusted with her comment about giving them the dog's toothbrush which LP mentioned the female security person overheard Cindy say! OMG!
What is wrong with this woman?!
"WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"
A quote spray painted on the wall by search
and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.
What I post are my opinions only.
This email just proves that there is nothing that CA won't do to sabotage this investigation. I watched the video and at the end it said that since she has lost her grandaughter that they probably would not file charges against CA. IMO, that should be reason that they arrest her immediately. I am so angry at her over this I can onlly imagine how LE/FBI must be feeling.
I knew she was too smart to completely believe the drivel she was trying to sell to the agents, and so I gave her points for her willingness to humiliate herself on her daughter's behalf. I was repeatedly embarrassed by her total ignorance of common social graces, but I was very impressed with her primoridal, ferocious, loyalty to her daughter.
Until tonight, I attributed every combative, manipulative, seemingly irrational, statement of Cindy's to a combination of blind, fierce loyalty and extreme stress. She was a lioness, cornered, but protecting her cub.
Tonight, however, her cavalier explanation about Caylee's hairbrush and her joke about the dogs' toothbrush brought everything into the glaring light of reality: Cindy is playing a game, and the prize she's after is to outsmart us all.
That's the same game Casey excels at--I wonder who will win.
Chilling, absolutely chilling. IMHO
In the beginning, LE were thoughtful of the Anthonys' plight and thought they'd be more than willing to help LE find Caylee, their missing granddaughters. They didn't expect these people to cover up for a murderer. In a missing child case, it's not unusual for the police to ask the family to gather anything with the child's DNA on it: hairbrush, toothbrush, clothing, favorite toys.
For this reason alone I believe LE should lock this woman in a cell far away from her nasty daughter. They shouldn't be allowed to see each other ever again. I'm horrified she has chosen to cover up for Casey rather than get justice for little Caylee.
© My brain is copyright-protected.
Please pardon any typos. I'm a lousy typist and an even worse proofreader.
Big Brother and the Thought Police have arrived
1984 by George Orwell (1949)
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
This news made me completely fall off the fence. I no longer believe CA is a victim of serious denial. If the email is proven true, then I do believe she should be arrested. Just because she is in a horrible situation gives her no right to obstruct justice!
Didn't Scott Peterson's parents appear to be helping him flee? A message needs to be sent to families that enabling their kids to be criminals is against the law!!!
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
In memory of Ron Pruitt
I certainly hope Cindy is not arrested prior to the trial. If she has charges pending, she could take the 5th and say nothing on the stand. Without having been arrested, LE now has a hold over her. She will take the stand knowing that if she makes one mis-statemet, utters one mis-truth, she'll leave the courtroom and end up in handcuffs. Unless she is a total idiot, she'll fess up on the stand. But them, I'm the eternal optimist.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
In memory of Ron Pruitt
As far as her ever being charged though, I can only think of John Couey's family members that lied about his whereabouts and denied that he lived in their home while Jessica Lunsford was still alive, and one of them then went on to buy him a bus ticket out of town that he didn't get a chance to use. The Florida prosecuters did not choose to prosecute them, which could have been a huge warning to RSO's families to not try to protect their family members in the future. And their actions may have changed the outcome of the case, she was alive when they lied to LE. With them not prosecuting them I can't see them taking a she gave us the wrong hairbrush and washed a pair of pants case.
Its possible that LE obtained the brush by telling the A's that it was no big deal, and just procedure. We've seen them do it in interviews.
If they are playing it really low key then they cant say ' Look,its no big deal but you need to give us the brush that only caylee uses, so when the lab tests the hair to identify her body, its gotta be right'
They're gonna say "look we'll probably never even need it, but its better to get it out of the way and cover all bases.'
That could explain why she only gave them one brush, and realised after the fact that she had a brush that was used exclusively by caylee that could be more useful.
Maybe she spoke to LG about it and asked if she should give LE the other brush, and thats how he knows about it.
There are other possible scenarios, than she was trying to cover for Casey. I think both scenarios are plausible, so i'm sitting on the fence...still weighing it up.
I didn't know the Federal Bureau of Investigation had a soft-side.
Oh, that's right, it doesn't.
We'll see what happens.
well looks like they really "helped thier daughter" karma is a btch .. i knew the lord and angel caylee would come up with a way to get justice .. that email .. :") its all gonna unravel now .. better buckle the seat belts
kikas halloween album
Just got done listening to her explanation of what happened with the brush.
YOU are the ring-master of your own circus.
Why am i not in shock over this? This whole family is one big joke and i do think before its all said and done with there will be plenty more come out. As for saying i didnt search the house for all the brushes but it wasn't deception. Why would you not search for Caylee's brush? I dont feel sorry for this woman at all and never have and i have always felt that she knew more then she was telling. I wish LG would just come out with it NOW!
My Mom told me (and showed me) that "Parent is a verb, not a noun" ~ thanks Mom
I don't understand why there is so much gullibility here as to believe this email is not doctored. Obviously it was put into a paint program with a round paint tool to black out the email addresses. The time zone is obviously missing and the date has been typed in. He isn't too good at doctoring as he has several tries there, 20, 21, 20. He must not have been able to decide which would be more believable. I know how this happened, its happened to me before. He first erased the date. Then when he made his text box he didn't create it big enough for the font size. Sometimes the extra isn't visible until you enlarge the text box. At least that is true with MS Paint. No valid email would have this type of date. The footer is missing also. So, we have header and footer both missing. Sounds like a body with no head or feet to me, a lack of common sense and understanding. He is a vengeful man who was exposed for fraud with trying to obtain money from NBC through the Anthony's. I hope his fraud is addressed in this case too.
Believe NG? She didn't even show the whole email. Of course not, it didn't fit the sensationalism she wanted to portray. As for LP's statement, what kind of honest bouty hunters would hear a statement like that and not report it right away? He is not an honorable man.
Perhaps the sleuthing would be better directed by looking with a critical eye at the actual evidence rather than rumor and media statements. Has anyone noticed that the co-workers Casey claimed to have, that were judged to not exist, do actually exist? The email the detective supposedly followed up on, just hours before her first arrest, did contain actual email addresses that had been valid. The return message from the email server said the accounts had been closed or were no longer active. @universal.com does actual exist too, but @events.universal.com apparantly does not exist. So why didn't he look at the full header and track this down in order to determine who this TF is? Too easy to convict the mother instead? As long as there are these types of questions in my mind I'll give the defendant the benefit of the doubt. Our law says innocent until proven guilty, not hang them now before the real truth can be exposed.
I know this won't be too popular but can anyone dispute, factually, what I am saying?