Given yesterday's revelation of CA's alleged deception, I think it might be time to revisit some of the oddities of this case.
In the beginning when this witness came forward, our first impression was that a straw hat didn't seem like KC's style, but maybe she borrowed it from CA.
He describes a woman wearing sunglasses and a straw hat, struggling with a bag and bumping her head. Perhaps we are looking too closely at the wrong pictures. A well dressed man on a cell phone on the bridge, this is not an ordinary scene to be all dressed up and fishing ??
Another statement that keeps ringing in my ears is KC's phone call home. When she says, "You don't know what MY involvement is ?? " This may not be verbatim, but is close to what was said.
Not to mention all the other things that don't add up, there are now too many to ignore or dismiss as grief or confusion. :waitasec:
In the beginning when this witness came forward, our first impression was that a straw hat didn't seem like KC's style, but maybe she borrowed it from CA.
He describes a woman wearing sunglasses and a straw hat, struggling with a bag and bumping her head. Perhaps we are looking too closely at the wrong pictures. A well dressed man on a cell phone on the bridge, this is not an ordinary scene to be all dressed up and fishing ??
Another statement that keeps ringing in my ears is KC's phone call home. When she says, "You don't know what MY involvement is ?? " This may not be verbatim, but is close to what was said.
Not to mention all the other things that don't add up, there are now too many to ignore or dismiss as grief or confusion. :waitasec: