A very interesting subject has been raised on The 3As by our fellow member, Mr. Tony Bennett. He received a communication from a reader of his book.
This is a link to the thread: http://the3arguidos.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=26892
(a clip from there)
"There is one matter about the pajamas Madeleine was allegedly wearing the night she disappeared and that Jane Tanner allegedly saw on the child she claimed to see being carried away that night, and this matter has not (as far as I can tell) been picked up by any investigator or newspaper anywhere. But in my opinion it is hugely important and points to Jane Tanners testimony probably being fabricated.
If you look carefully at the pajamas that the Drs. McCann held up at the press conference apparently identical to those Madeleine was wearing on May 3, youll see that the pajama bottoms were short. If you look at the length of the legs, compared with the waist/width, they are clearly short: they would not have extended even to the childs knees, and definitely not below them. They would probably have been mid-thigh length. They are very clearly not full/ankle-length pajama bottoms."
I thought I would give you all a chance to judge for yourself.....
This is a link to the thread: http://the3arguidos.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=26892
(a clip from there)
"There is one matter about the pajamas Madeleine was allegedly wearing the night she disappeared and that Jane Tanner allegedly saw on the child she claimed to see being carried away that night, and this matter has not (as far as I can tell) been picked up by any investigator or newspaper anywhere. But in my opinion it is hugely important and points to Jane Tanners testimony probably being fabricated.
If you look carefully at the pajamas that the Drs. McCann held up at the press conference apparently identical to those Madeleine was wearing on May 3, youll see that the pajama bottoms were short. If you look at the length of the legs, compared with the waist/width, they are clearly short: they would not have extended even to the childs knees, and definitely not below them. They would probably have been mid-thigh length. They are very clearly not full/ankle-length pajama bottoms."
I thought I would give you all a chance to judge for yourself.....