01-29-2009, 02:35 PM #1
Search Warrant Sought Items From Anthony Home Dec. 20th
Search Warrant - December 20th
I'm curious about a number of items listed on this search warrant. OCSO wanted "the original clothing George Anthony last saw Caylee Anthony wearing on June 16th (pink colored top, blue jean skirt or skort, white shoes, small child's backpack with monkey design and white rimmed sunglasses)..."
Why would they be seeking this specific clothing on December 20th and not prior? GA told them the clothes Caylee was supposed to be wearing a long time ago. They waited until last month to get those clothes?
01-29-2009, 02:37 PM #2
cuz she wasn't found wearing those clothes....jmo
01-29-2009, 02:41 PM #3
I am thinking that LE was looking for a missing child prior to Dec 11 regardless of what evidence they had of a deceased Caylee. Casey was indited for Murder on Oct 14th not convicted, they still did not have any evidence of where the remains were. I assume that the fact that when the remains were found on Dec 11 the clothe in the bag/around the crime scene did not match what George had told them Caylee was wearing on June 16,there for they didn't need to look for her clothe until Dec 20th.
01-29-2009, 02:42 PM #4
01-29-2009, 02:44 PM #5
Maybe it is because the A fam have contended all along these items were missing from the home. Now they want to be specific by naming them in the SW to determine if they are still there plus to have George testify those are the items he claimed to have seen that day. They want to pin it down.
"Answer yes or no...is this what you said she was wearing, George?" being asked by LE during a "tough question" interrogation which could be up and coming soon."WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"
A quote spray painted on the wall by search
and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.
What I post are my opinions only.
01-29-2009, 02:52 PM #6
They sought a child's backpack with monkey design. Isn't that the "Adorable" backpack? They already have one of those taken from the Pontiac. They were looking for another one in the house?
Did CSI ever previously look through Caylee's clothing at the house?
01-29-2009, 02:59 PM #7
Can't see how locating, or not locating, these items can prove anything, but it certainly might disprove GA's June 16th account. Hmmm________________________
01-29-2009, 03:07 PM #8
01-29-2009, 03:10 PM #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
01-29-2009, 03:12 PM #10
How would it do that? George would not have known if KC brought those clothes back into the house after June 16th. Isn't she known to enter the house when the parents are not home?
Also, how would prosecutors know that Caylee did or did not have multiple pink shirts, jean skirts, white shoes, etc? OCSO already had a monkey backpack - so they were thinking she had multiples of this item?
01-29-2009, 03:16 PM #11
Exactly! Big mistake on the OCSO's part. I would think they'd have searched for those items the first time they went through the house...if anything, just to back up what GA told them. If they (the clothes) were there, then obviously GA was mistaken. If they aren't there, then there would be no need to second guess GA's statement.
01-29-2009, 03:19 PM #12
01-29-2009, 03:21 PM #13
01-29-2009, 03:22 PM #14
But chances are she wouldn't have 2 of the exact same shirts...jeans maybe, but not shirts. She's not a twin, so what would be the reason for having more than one of the same thing? I do have same colored shirts, but their styles & patterns are different. Maybe GA wasn't entirely sure of the pattern or style, only remembered that Caylee was wearing a pink shirt, therefore LE found it unnecessary to go through all of Caylee's shirts? I'm not sure...just trying to look through this. I can't help but wonder if LE should have looked anyway, especially considering it was supposedly opened as a missing child case...one in which an Amber Alert was not issued right away. I questioned it right off the bat. I hope it doesn't come back to haunt the prosecution.
01-29-2009, 03:24 PM #15
By Byrdbrain in forum Michelle YoungReplies: 230Last Post: 05-22-2011, 08:14 PM
By chicagofa13 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 312Last Post: 12-21-2008, 02:10 PM
By Byrdbrain in forum Nancy CooperReplies: 313Last Post: 11-04-2008, 11:24 AM