Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 4 12 13 14 15 LastLast
Results 196 to 210 of 217
  1. #196
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    19,931
    Quote Originally Posted by magic-cat View Post
    Here is the thing. D. Casey's cell phone number was NOT the one the tip line was ringing into was it? Doubtful. So, that "tip" from Ginny the psychic had to have come in on the regular tip line and someone had to have told her to then call him. Why would they do this? Why would they not call him and tell him about the tip and have HIM call her? And what are the odds that this tip came in on the tip line and whomever was manning that line had the psychic call DC THAT early in the morning. I mean, he said it was between what 8 and 9 when he met Mr. Hoover, and he got that call BEFORE he met him, so that psychic was up pretty early in the morning to get a tip in on the tip line and then have someone just give her DC's number right then and he just so happens to be headed down there anyway to check out the kiomarie statement BEFORE the meet and greet?

    NOT ONE CHANCE that is the truth. Not one single solitary chance that is the sequence of events that lead to him going there. It had NOTHING to do with kiomarie-that statement was OLD and DC had been on the case since what July? NO WAY DC! It was a little late in the game to be checking out the "hang-out" to verify the truth of a statement made so long ago. You were told to go there, but not by any psychic and not to verify kiomaries statement...that just made for a good cover-story didn't it? The truth will come out...I do not know why these people even bother to TRY to lie.
    It is tiresome isn't it.


  2. #197
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    2,409
    Quote Originally Posted by lin View Post
    You may be correct; can't fault the logic at all. Not sure if there is such a charge in FL and doubtful it would stick either way, since nothing was obstructed. He didn't find anything. If he had, then that could be a whole 'nother kettle of fish. Well, that's if he's telling the truth about not finding anything and didn't lie about that too, after disturbing the scene, possibly removing or adding things.

    Thanks. But, body or not, the crime of conspiracy still took place. For example, if a man decides he wants to be out of his marriage and decided a hit man might be a better option to achieve his ends, his meeting with and talking to the hit man is a crime, even if the hit man doesn't go through with it or happens to be LE. The crime still happened, a lesser on than murder, sure, but, a crime still took place. Conspiracy to commit the illegal act.






    All kinds of hugs!

    ROSIE




  3. The Following User Says Thank You to WholeLottaRosie For This Useful Post:


  4. #198
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    2,409
    Quote Originally Posted by Whisperer View Post
    After reading all the way down, this law applies to Florida. It states that a subpoena would be required.

    Thanks.






    All kinds of hugs!

    ROSIE




  5. #199
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by ks1 View Post
    I'm ruling out JB as either LE or the Bar would already have taken action against him if he were the person that told DC not to call 911. These tapes were just released to us, but are not new to LE. Kidfinders, not buying that one either. I'm thinking that CA and LA were together with DC, CA was telling him where to look and LA asked him not to call LE. Calling LE would defeat their entire purpose of sending DC to the body. IMO, they knew where it was, and wanted DC to make sure that it was hidden so they could continue the charade.
    ks1, I think this is a good point. Although I am not sure if I agree with you about CA/LA.

    For argument's sake, let's just say it was JB that DC identified during the off record portion of the i/v.

    Presumably LE would then alert the SA to their findings. What would the SA do? We know that the judge has reviewed the i/v and released it, but if action were being taken against JB by the bar, would we necessarily know about it at this point?

    Given that DC was so obviously lying during other portions of the i/v, would his word that it was JB who told him not to alert LE be enough to go to the bar without corroboration?


  6. #200
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,028
    I have to believe it was someone on the defense or someone hired by them.

    I just can't allow myself to believe that GA would allow Caylee to rot out in the woods. I just can't.

    It has JB written all over it, and maybe the bar investigation is a bigger issue than we thought.


  7. #201
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,694
    Quote Originally Posted by Medusa View Post
    Thanks. But, body or not, the crime of conspiracy still took place. For example, if a man decides he wants to be out of his marriage and decided a hit man might be a better option to achieve his ends, his meeting with and talking to the hit man is a crime, even if the hit man doesn't go through with it or happens to be LE. The crime still happened, a lesser on than murder, sure, but, a crime still took place. Conspiracy to commit the illegal act.
    Quite logical. Just not sure it's a statutory offense. Am pretty sure conspiracy to commit jaywalking is not a statutory offense.

    Even if it is an indictable offense, since they didn't go through with the plan, I'm not sure it would stick, even if charged. Yes, they had intent. I agree. But making that stick when nothing happened could be a bit tricky. The defense may successfully argue it's like planning to rob a bank that doesn't exist. And the court isn't going to assume what is in a man's heart.
    Opinion above.




    wftv link
    Casey's attorney said it's not in her best interest to tell what she knows about where Caylee is. "It does her no good to show her cards to give the prosecution any advantage they have to put her away for life," Baez said.
    How's that workin' for ya'?

    Please click here to donate to TES


    WARNING! EXTRA SPECIAL GRIEF CAUSES IRRITATION
    .


  8. #202
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    336
    IMO it was JB and he was told by Casey which is why she allegedly said when she saw the news of Caylee's body being found "this can't be happening now."


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to secretsquirrel For This Useful Post:


  10. #203
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    553
    DC had several visits with KC in jail. He says he had a contract with her personally, not just JB. He seems kinda confused over whether or not that one is still in effect....I think that's why he was worried about "privileged" info. JB may have had KC "hire" him separately, so all bases were covered by "privilege". For him then to leave JB's employ, while still contracted to KC, and then go under a contract with CA & GA, smacks of JB manipulating a way "inside" the A's home and getting info that he wouldn't have otherwise, since the the A's don't like him very much.

    I don't think JB is quite incompetent enough to flat out tell DC not to call 911, but I can see him suggesting that KC tell him to call JB first, if a body is found, and spinning it to KC that he's "protecting" her interests. Then if it comes out (as it always does!) it goes back to KC, not JB. I think the instructions to not call 911 may have actually come up quite a while ago, maybe way back when TES & others were conducting a lot of searches.

    The other alternative I see is KFN. They were under such scrutiny about never having actually found anyone, that I can see DM or SM suggesting that it would be SOOOO much easier on the A's if someone near & dear to them, like KFN, who has supported them for SOOOO long, were the ones who "found" Caylee....The whole "psychic" connect smacks of some of their sleazy actions. And what a fundraising tool - We're the ones who found Caylee! Give us $ to help us find others! (with GA holding the donation can)!

    But let's not forget that DC made another statement, that the Judge sealed that has not been released yet. Was that because it caused another investigation to be opened??? We'll have to wait and see......ARGGGHHHH!!!

    JMO
    Last edited by Meemom; 02-21-2009 at 01:22 PM. Reason: add comment


  11. #204
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    19,931
    I was so confused by the whole interview. I'm trying really hard to figure out what info LE was trying to get out of DC. I think it was JB that may have directed the PIs not to reveal info about the remains, but LE wanted something more. The back and forth conversation about the "leads" is making me nuts (which ones would you tell us about, which ones wouldn't you; how many "psychic" leads, etc). I'm getting the feeling that they ARE trying to figure out if the A camp had prior knowledge...but I also get the feeling they know something else. Anyone else's insight would be greatly appreciated. It's like an itch I can't scratch.


  12. #205
    Quote Originally Posted by Jolynna View Post
    Of course the Anthony's love Caylee.

    That is why they sent someone to look for her among the pavers.

    Baez wouldn't do that. Defense lawyers don't send P.I.s out to look for dead bodies. Baez's job isn't to investigate.

    Family WOULD want Caylee found.

    IMO
    At NO time did the A fam want Caylee's body found!! They openly maintained they did not and would NOT look or help searchers who were looking for her dead body. They came right out and said many times they would not even associate with people who thought she was dead.

    Now...we are hearing Cindy say she sent people to search the area where Caylee was found. I think they already knew where she was and were trying to relocate her after the water went down...for what purpose is the question. It sure wasn't going to be to turn her over to LE or for a proper burial!
    "WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
    THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
    AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"

    A quote spray painted on the wall by search
    and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.



    What I post are my opinions only.


  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SeriouslySearching For This Useful Post:


  14. #206
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    647
    I felt that DC was walking through a mine field (maybe a mind field too) Trying to remember what he heard and when he heard it. He could not betray whatever he heard in Baez office. I am sure whatever he heard was under a confidentiality agreement. He sounded confused and they were throwing questions trying to trip him anyway they could. I tried twice to listen to it but I couldn't get all the way through it. I found it annoying and really didn't bring out any interesting information to me.


  15. #207
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    553
    Quote Originally Posted by RR0004 View Post
    I was so confused by the whole interview. I'm trying really hard to figure out what info LE was trying to get out of DC. I think it was JB that may have directed the PIs not to reveal info about the remains, but LE wanted something more. The back and forth conversation about the "leads" is making me nuts (which ones would you tell us about, which ones wouldn't you; how many "psychic" leads, etc). I'm getting the feeling that they ARE trying to figure out if the A camp had prior knowledge...but I also get the feeling they know something else. Anyone else's insight would be greatly appreciated. It's like an itch I can't scratch.
    Bolded by me-

    I'm wondering if the LE & FBI were trying to establish that there was no criteria for the tip info the A's received, and therefore not all leads were followed up on or turned over to LE....something that may come up in trial when JB starts trying to throw LE under the bus as not following up leads that the A's had and therefore could have saved Caylee from the "kidnappers". Also that if this was a credible enough tip for DC to follow up on THREE times, why was it not forwarded to LE? Building OJ charges? JMO


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Meemom For This Useful Post:


  17. #208
    I would say the mines went off when DC walked into the interview...because he had already tripped over the truth long beforehand.
    "WE SEEK FOR THE TRUTH. WE SEEK JUSTICE.
    THE COURTS REQUIRE IT. THE VICTIMS CRY FOR IT
    AND GOD DEMANDS IT!"

    A quote spray painted on the wall by search
    and rescue workers, Team 5, at the OKC Bombing site 4-19-1995.



    What I post are my opinions only.


  18. The Following User Says Thank You to SeriouslySearching For This Useful Post:


  19. #209
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    19,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Meemom View Post
    Bolded by me-

    I'm wondering if the LE & FBI were trying to establish that there was no criteria for the tip info the A's received, and therefore not all leads were followed up on or turned over to LE....something that may come up in trial when JB starts trying to throw LE under the bus as not following up leads that the A's had and therefore could have saved Caylee from the "kidnappers". Also that if this was a credible enough tip for DC to follow up on THREE times, why was it not forwarded to LE? Building OJ charges? JMO
    Oooh, could be. Thanks!


  20. #210
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    277
    I don't think that KC ever spilled the beans to JB about where Caylee was located. She knew her mama was going to take care of the minor details (such as making sure Caylee's remains were never found), having told her when she was bonded out where Caylee was. That is why KC slept on mama's floor, so they could discuss the in's and out's and figure out what to do. Remember, the only important thing is that Caylee knew that she was loved. I wonder how loved she felt as her body lay in the woods. This case just gets more and more bizarre with each new document dump. The info that they DON'T include in the dump must be some pretty major stuff.


Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 4 12 13 14 15 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 4 Yr Old NY Child Found Dead After 911 Call
    By julianne in forum Crimes in the News
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-04-2010, 04:43 PM
  2. Couple Found Dead After Frantic 911 Call
    By ckwood32 in forum Crimes in the News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-24-2008, 11:37 PM
  3. The 911 Call
    By CW in forum Darlie Routier
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 07-20-2005, 12:11 AM
  4. John Found JonBenet's Body Prior to 911 Call
    By BlueCrab in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11-09-2004, 02:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •