View Poll Results: Why Have None of the Anthony's Been Charged w/Obstruction?? Can pick more than one...

Voters
248. You may not vote on this poll
  • LE/SA Office does not think they did anything wrong

    14 5.65%
  • LE/SA Office does not have a strong enough evidence to make it stick

    69 27.82%
  • LE/SA Office does not want to go after them because of public sympathy

    60 24.19%
  • Just waiting for the right time for LA

    122 49.19%
  • Just waiting for the right time for GA

    68 27.42%
  • Just waiting for the right time for CA

    110 44.35%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 154
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    12,303
    Quote Originally Posted by Searchfortruth View Post
    I did think about the last question you posed. I didn't like SP's mother because she was so pathetic in her denial that he had done anything wrong. That's it though. I have never held any bad feelings, that I can remember, for the parent's of a murderer. I hold people accountable for their actions. I hold Casey responsible for Caylee's murder. I hold the Anthony's responsible for their attempt to derail the investigation. I don't think there has ever been a set of parent's like them, that we have seen. Their behavior, from "day one" has been incomprehensible, IMO.
    I agree with your position on this. The Anthony family - GA, CA, and LA, reminded me initially of JP's denial. But the Anthony's have gone above and beyond JP with the behavior they've displayed publicly since the beginning. It's their inappropriate behavior, attempts to derail the investigation, the possibility that they've profitted from Caylee's death, and willingness to throw innocent people under the bus that I'm angry about.
    My posts are my opinion..........




  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Leila For This Useful Post:


  3. #62
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Orlando, FL, USA
    Posts
    771
    Hi everyone. I'm new here and this is my first post.

    I don't think there will be charges against GA, CA or LA until after KC's trial is finished (if at all). If any of these 3 were charged before hand, then they could possibly plead the 5th rather than testifying against KC during her trial.


  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Omachka For This Useful Post:


  5. #63
    mikeysmommom's Avatar
    mikeysmommom is offline "A grandchild fills a space in your heart that you never knew was empty...."
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Garden State
    Posts
    4,617
    Quote Originally Posted by Cookie278 View Post
    I doubt that any charges will be brought against the A's at all. One, I don't think the prosecutors will feel the need to put this family thru anymore. Especially when it is looking as if they will be able to get a conviction regardless of what the A's may or may not have done. And two, what really have they done? Yes CA washed some clothes, but she didnt have the car taken to the crusher, thus destroying all evidence. CA may have had someone search but she didn't have them find the body and move it and make sure it would never surface. What she may have done if DC had found it, who knows. Can't try someone for what they might have done.

    I know some of you feel very strongly about the behavior of the A's. Some of us are more sympathetic than others. But from a legal standpoint I just dont see charges being brought

    And slightly off topic, but I want to say this since it keeps bouncing around in my head..I wonder how much of the Anthony hate(?) is due to our inability to comprehend how one person, KC, could ever have done this. That maybe we need more people to blame. If it is simply KC waking up one day and doing this horrific act then maybe it could happen to anybody. But if we can blame the parents, at least in part, then maybe we feel, that we, as parents, have more control, and our children wont end up like KC. Not sure if this makes sense or if I am wording this right. Shouldn't post while working.
    I just wanted to say ITA.A lot of people have said this would never happen in their family,but whats makes anyone think something like this can not happen to them? Blaming the whole family IMO gives a false sense of security.They are a dysfunctional family but if we had as much info on most families as we do the A's most would seem to have major issues as well.
    I Love You MOM 6/16/32 - 5/30/09





    Justice for Travis 5/8/13

    Justice For Emma
    Stacey Barker - Guilty - Murder 1 - 5/24/11
    25 to Life - Sentenced 6/17/11

    Justice Denied for Caylee Marie Anthony
    July 5,2011


  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikeysmommom For This Useful Post:


  7. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,339
    Quote Originally Posted by kageykaren View Post
    LE has had to continually put on their, "High Wadders" Lol! when trying to make since of the A's statements to better investigate the murder of Caylee by the A's daughter KC! One thing that stuck out in my mind because I found it amusing, was LE asking Hoover several times, who CA was yelling at during her fit of rage that appeared to be directed towards several LE officers! CA's unabashed rage towards the people who were always there for her, G, and L was so inappropriately displaced. I'm glad to have not seen CA carrying a bat to bang crosses at the pretinous memorial services.
    I'd like to know Cindy's pastor's opinion of her beating a cross to death!


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to mitzi For This Useful Post:


  9. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,762
    Quote Originally Posted by mitzi View Post
    I'd like to know Cindy's pastor's opinion of her beating a cross to death!
    I would hope, if he's truly a man of God, that he is full of concern and compassion for a member of his flock who is experiencing such horrible emotional pain and conflict.


  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chilly Willy For This Useful Post:


  11. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by Leila View Post
    Those pants could be a major key in linking Casey to the murder. Cindy says the pants "smelled like the car" so she washed them. But, no one knows if the pants only smelled or if there was any sort of evidence on them, such as blood (from Caylee).
    or in them-such as a chloroform rag or drugs or a sheet of stickers...Heck-the BACKING off that one sticker we saw in the search warrant pictures-THAT could have once been inside the car and was removed pre-police arrival.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bluebelle View Post
    2 reasons, I think:

    1. The state wants to get justice for Caylee before anything else so they are first focusing on their case against her murderous mother.

    2. The state is waiting to get their testimonies from Casey's trial to solidify their cases against these three liars; no doubt this trio will perjure themselves since they obviously don't know how to tell the truth. I say GOOD, get them under oath with their lies. And don't think the FBI will look the other way either, the A's have wasted valuable time and resources with their lies & remember, Martha Stewart went to prison solely for lying to the Feds. I believe the Feds and also local law enforcement will charge the A’s for everything they've done to thwart the investigation into Caylee's murder.
    I so much hope that you are right. Just as Casey's problems in life and her raising is not reason enough to excuse her for murder-neither are the problems the Anthony family faces reason enough to excuse illegal and unethical behavior that just goes on and on and never ends!

    Quote Originally Posted by Omachka View Post
    Hi everyone. I'm new here and this is my first post.

    I don't think there will be charges against GA, CA or LA until after KC's trial is finished (if at all). If any of these 3 were charged before hand, then they could possibly plead the 5th rather than testifying against KC during her trial.
    WELCOME!

    Quote Originally Posted by Chilly Willy View Post
    I would hope, if he's truly a man of God, that he is full of concern and compassion for a member of his flock who is experiencing such horrible emotional pain and conflict.
    Ain't it the truth...

    You know, on the whole cross issue...think about it-Jesus was TORTURED and TORMENTED on a cross and lost His life there. He was NAILED hand and foot and then speared through while hanging there. He had a crown of horrible awful thorns pressed into His head while He was there. He cried out to His Father and received no response. He died there for us, but I have some very serious doubts whether He would want us to memorialize the symbol of His suffering with quite such reverence as we do.

    He said pick up your cross and follow me-meaning-pick up your own suffering and follow after my ways. He did not literally mean for us to pick up a cross, and I doubt this instruction meant that we should make an idol of the very cross upon which He hung.
    Last edited by magic-cat; 03-10-2009 at 01:12 AM. Reason: Added one final thought so those 3 people who were not mad yet due to this post could be...lol

    ABC provided $200,000.00 to
    Casey Anthonys defense!
    The MURDERED should not be USED to pay for the MURDERERS DEFENSE!

    American Tragedy: The defense of Casey Anthony.

    Juror No. 11 somehow made the journey from Casey is the one on trial to George may be a murderer, based on how George acted on the stand? 3 years of evidence against Casey and he throws George under the bus. Makes sense?
    What evidence indicated that George might be a murderer? Anyone?
    Weren't they to ONLY consider EVIDENCE?
    This NOT GUILTY verdict throws Caylee right back into the swamp she decomposed in. Thanks to this "impartial" jury.


  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to magic-cat For This Useful Post:


  13. #67
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    St. Augustine
    Posts
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by natsound View Post
    Could you link to that? I hadn't seen or heard that.
    At the end the Dec LE interview with DC he talks about this and in the Dec 18 JH interview with LE he talks about how Cindy would give the tips out and tell them which direction to go in and LE questions why CA kept those tips from LE.

    Hoover http://www.orlandosentinel.com/media...3/45412199.pdf


    Dominic Casey http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0219/18750716.pdf

    For more info see the dedicated threads on these 2 interviews.
    What if the hokey-pokey is what it is all about?


  14. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by Searchfortruth View Post
    The problem, IMO, is not her sending someone to search or not so much, it's what she was putting forth publicly and to LE and then what she was doing in private.
    Respectfully snipped for space.

    Exactly! Why the two faces if there is nothing to hide?

    I do understand that the grandparents are between a rock and a hard place. However, the truth doesn't choose sides.
    My Mom told me (and showed me) that "Parent is a verb, not a noun" ~ thanks Mom


  15. The Following User Says Thank You to BonKai For This Useful Post:


  16. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    9,903
    Quote Originally Posted by magic-cat View Post
    There was no choice of none of the above so I did not vote. I think they are not charging them because if they do so then the A's can plead the 5th when called to the witness stand and THAT is something that LE will not see happen-not even for well deserved charges against them all!
    I agree with your post entirely. I didn't vote either, as none of the choices specified how I felt. None of the above would have been my choice also.


  17. #70
    KenoshaKid's Avatar
    KenoshaKid is offline All the darkness in the world cannot put out a single candle
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Central Virginia near the Blue Ridge Mountains
    Posts
    1,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Chilly Willy View Post
    I don't believe the A's have done anything that rises to the level of obstruction of justice. Justice has NOT been obstructed, Casey will be tried for murder.
    If it could be proven that someone purposely deleted a bunch of files off of KC's computer so that LE didn't have access to them (not knowing that they could retrieve them anyway) would you consider that obstruction? Or no?
    I'm no lawyer and have no clue just how cut and dried it has to be to be considered obstruction. I'll defer to you much more informed sleuths.


  18. #71
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,158
    There are several hypothetical criminal charges that have been discussed a million times, even with the actual Florida statutes being cited. It isn't just obstruction of justice, but also aiding and abetting after the fact in a case involving a child (the law was purposefully changed so that close family members could be charged), lying to LE (a crime Casey is charged with) and perjury. They all have different elements, and it makes a difference. I think anything found in Casey's abandoned car smelling of death, every item, is potential evidence - it was a potential crime scene, or part of one, if a body was ever stored in the car. If something was altered or tampered with, cleaned or destroyed, it was, even if Casey was later charged with a crime anyway. That isn't the test, certainly not for every potential charge. It also doesn't excuse any and every activity because a criminal prosecution wasn't totally derailed.


  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to amethyst221 For This Useful Post:


  20. #72
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,495
    Quote Originally Posted by karenz View Post
    At the end the Dec LE interview with DC he talks about this and in the Dec 18 JH interview with LE he talks about how Cindy would give the tips out and tell them which direction to go in and LE questions why CA kept those tips from LE.

    Hoover http://www.orlandosentinel.com/media...3/45412199.pdf


    Dominic Casey http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0219/18750716.pdf

    For more info see the dedicated threads on these 2 interviews.
    In the links to the JH interview you posted, I don't see where CA sends them to that spot to look for a dead Caylee. I do see where she keeps giving police tips on live sightings, and Dominic too. Do you think CA received a "tip" about the spot? Dominic says he received a tip, I don't get the feeling it was from CA. And I just don't believe anything Dominic says in his interview!


  21. #73
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,762
    Quote Originally Posted by KenoshaKid View Post
    If it could be proven that someone purposely deleted a bunch of files off of KC's computer so that LE didn't have access to them (not knowing that they could retrieve them anyway) would you consider that obstruction? Or no?
    I'm no lawyer and have no clue just how cut and dried it has to be to be considered obstruction. I'll defer to you much more informed sleuths.
    I certainly would have questions about files being deleted by someone other than Casey prior to LE confiscating Casey's computer on 7/16, however, according to Tony, the computer was not working when Lee arrived at his apartment that evening.


  22. #74
    ecs5298's Avatar
    ecs5298 is offline Founding Member of AFKBPOFPOPL & Hardwood Mulch King & Bacon Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    United States of Bacon
    Posts
    9,296
    Quote Originally Posted by Chilly Willy View Post
    I certainly would have questions about files being deleted by someone other than Casey prior to LE confiscating Casey's computer on 7/16, however, according to Tony, the computer was not working when Lee arrived at his apartment that evening.
    I'm not contradicting anything you posted Chilly. I'm just using your post as a vehicle to throw out this idea.

    Having a little bit of knowledge about computers, just because Windows was showing a BSOD (Blue Screen of Death, yes it is an official term) doesn't mean there was no recoverable data on the disk. Actually quite opposite. When data is erased, it's really not erased. Windows just kind of loses the map to where it put the file (deletes the files entry in the allocation table). So the data is still there until it is over written. Windows will usually try and not overwrite data, if it has fresh sectors to write to. To totally cleanse a hard drive you need to use 3rd party utilities like a drive shredder (these utilities work by writing useless data across all sectors of the drive and then deleting all of them and then repeating the process about 3 times).

    So, even if LA thought he was being super sneaky and corrupting Windows (like that's hard to do), LE computer forensics experts have utiliities to retrieve the data on the hard drive even if it was erased. I'm sure nothing on that laptop was lost.

    Sorry for hijacking your post Chilly....
    "When it all goes down the crapper, don't come crying to me. You were warned" - ecs5298, November 6, 2012


  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ecs5298 For This Useful Post:


  24. #75
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,762
    Quote Originally Posted by ecs5298 View Post
    I'm not contradicting anything you posted Chilly. I'm just using your post as a vehicle to throw out this idea.

    Having a little bit of knowledge about computers, just because Windows was showing a BSOD (Blue Screen of Death, yes it is an official term) doesn't mean there was no recoverable data on the disk. Actually quite opposite. When data is erased, it's really not erased. Windows just kind of loses the map to where it put the file (deletes the files entry in the allocation table). So the data is still there until it is over written. Windows will usually try and not overwrite data, if it has fresh sectors to write to. To totally cleanse a hard drive you need to use 3rd party utilities like a drive shredder (these utilities work by writing useless data across all sectors of the drive and then deleting all of them and then repeating the process about 3 times).

    So, even if LA thought he was being super sneaky and corrupting Windows (like that's hard to do), LE computer forensics experts have utiliities to retrieve the data on the hard drive even if it was erased. I'm sure nothing on that laptop was lost.

    Sorry for hijacking your post Chilly....
    Thanks, e, feel free to hijack anytime. It sounds to me like it was Casey who deleted files before Cindy picked her up at Tony's apartment. Something caused the BSOD before Lee arrived and picked up the computer. I don't think it was Lee who tried to be super sneaky, I think it was Casey.


  25. The Following User Says Thank You to Chilly Willy For This Useful Post:


Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. LE Links AND Orange County Jail Info AND Updated Charges Info - NO DISCUSSION!
    By Patience in forum Resource Links, Case Calendar & Time Lines
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 07-12-2010, 03:22 AM
  2. Could Lee Anthony face charges for obstruction of justice? PART TWO
    By Tom'sGirl in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 344
    Last Post: 01-18-2009, 03:12 PM
  3. Could Lee Anthony face charges for obstruction of justice?
    By Angel Who Cares in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 664
    Last Post: 12-30-2008, 02:03 PM
  4. Anthony Family Inconsistencies #3 Obstruction charges? perjury? Mistrial?
    By JADEPRINCESS in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 128
    Last Post: 12-15-2008, 03:16 PM
  5. Who is the perpetrator? Updated poll.
    By OriginalJerseyGirl in forum Janet Christiansen Abaroa
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-08-2006, 11:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •