Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,033

    6 Jurors versus 12 Jurors ... who will this benefit?

    There will only be 6 jurors seated for this case, as it stands, to this date:

    Florida Statute 913.10 Number of jurors.
    --Twelve persons shall constitute a jury to try all capital cases, and six persons shall constitute a jury to try all other criminal cases.

    http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/...913/ch0913.htm

    Florida typically seats only 6 jurors in a criminal case ... unless the death penalty is "on the table."

    Who will, if anyone, this benefit?

    Facts:

    The US Supreme Court decision in WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) 399 U.S. 78, decided that a jury of 6 or more did not violate the defendants 6th Amendment right to a fair trial.

    To have a hung jury, only one juror would have to hold out. That is 1:6 odds versus (if the state had opted for the DP) a 1:12 odds, for KC to have a hung jury. It only takes one!!

    Who does this benefit in your opinion?
    Clue: Satsuma Edition

    It was the psycho-sicko in the trailer park with a brick-o-block!

    "Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter accusations" ~ "inside" motto of the CIA and the entire Anthony family!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Can't believe she is 4!!




  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to one_hooah_wife For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    277
    It appears to me that it will benefit the prosecution by only having to convice 6jurors of guilt, rather than 12. The odds of getting one wacko, KC loving jury member are reduced by half!


  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ks1 For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,033
    Some could look at it as fewer jurors seated ... fewer jurors to convince ... on either side!
    Clue: Satsuma Edition

    It was the psycho-sicko in the trailer park with a brick-o-block!

    "Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter accusations" ~ "inside" motto of the CIA and the entire Anthony family!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Can't believe she is 4!!




  6. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    close to the beach :)
    Posts
    232
    We've talked about this on other threads when reference was made to "12 people."

    All trials (except dp) in Florida use only 6 jurors so the SA and defense attorney are used to this. In fact, I would say that the majority of SA's and Defense A's here in Florida have never tried a case with 12 jurors.

    On one side you can say that there are less people to convince of guilt and on the other side you can say there are less people to influence someone who has doubt. Personally, I don't think either side benefits one way or the other.
    JMO

    "I...am not...stopping anymore...for you...to get...a file"

    "It is not how these officers died that made them heroes, it is how they lived." Inscription on the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial, Washington, DC


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to dax For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    543
    This really made my day. Instead of having 12, she will have 6.. this may be the reason why the took the DP off the table. The cards are stacked in the favor of the prosecution b/c it's 6 less folks to worry about.
    "She will be mutha of the year" Rick Anthony's response to Cindy


  9. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,184
    Quote Originally Posted by ks1 View Post
    It appears to me that it will benefit the prosecution by only having to convice 6jurors of guilt, rather than 12. The odds of getting one wacko, KC loving jury member are reduced by half!



  10. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,761
    I'm amazed there will be only 6 jurrors. I've been here every day since July and never came across this info before. Duh.
    Hawk. My BFF


  11. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Friday For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    647
    Is this only in Florida?


  13. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,033
    Quote Originally Posted by Manny View Post
    Is this only in Florida?
    Well, I have not looked at other state law ... and I am most familiar with TN and AL law .... so I do not know ... keep in mind this is a state's law matter ... for this case ... I Have referenced FL Law only!
    Clue: Satsuma Edition

    It was the psycho-sicko in the trailer park with a brick-o-block!

    "Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter accusations" ~ "inside" motto of the CIA and the entire Anthony family!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Can't believe she is 4!!




  14. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,761
    Not to be a kill-joy but if I were the only hold-out against convicting someone, I'd be more willing to yield to the opposing opinion of 11 other people, than I would be willing to yield to the opposing opinion of only 5 others. I'm not implying that I'd been more intimidated if eleven people ganged up on me. Rather, I mean that I'd be more willing to doubt/question my own judgment if 11 people adamantly disagreed with me. If there were only 5 people who saw things the opposite of me, I'd be more inclined to shrug that off, stand firm, and try to bring them around.

    Lately, I notice I'm using a lot more words to try to explain myself, but not doing a better job of it. LOL. So, to reduce all the above to one sentence: I'd be more willing to question my own judgment if 11 other people thought I was dead-wrong, than I'd be if only 5 people thought that.
    Hawk. My BFF


  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Friday For This Useful Post:


  16. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In a bubble.
    Posts
    2,258
    Seems to me that having only 6 jurors benefits the prosecution.


  17. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    622
    Quote Originally Posted by Friday View Post

    I'd be more willing to question my own judgment if 11 other people thought I was dead-wrong, than I'd be if only 5 people thought that.

    Certainly one way to look at it and I don't disagree.

    I think it works from both angles 50/50....


    But...

    What if you had two hold outs on a conviction in a group of 12 that you had to convince... or even three?

    Cutting the jury down to six, imo, cuts down on deliberation time.

    If I were a juror, I would rather deliberate with five other people than a group of twelve. With a smaller group, it's easier to discuss and you have less cross talk... To me, it's simply more focused.


  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Issi For This Useful Post:


  19. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,495
    I don't know if the 6:1 odds versus 12:1 odds works when talking about the chances of one juror holding out. I've long believed 12 people on a jury is too many, because instead of convincing 6 minds, you have to convince 12. We recently had a very important trial of a public official here. It was a mistrial because of 1 juror out of 12.. and this guy is so obviously guilty. Now taxpayers will have to cough up more cash to do it all over again.


  20. The Following User Says Thank You to natsound For This Useful Post:

    dax

  21. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,128
    I have served on a jury of 12 in an other state and also on a jury of 6 in Florida. The jury of 6 was much easier.


  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Marple For This Useful Post:


  23. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    528
    Altho I agree with Friday's comment, I also feel that lowering the number of jurors makes the jury feel more close. I know I would feel much closer with 5 other people I had come to sit with day after day than I would 11. Then during final deliberation to see those 5 other people felt she was guilty, I might be more keen to hearing them out and reconsidering than I would a larger amount of people I felt less of a connection with. That's JMO.


  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to trixi491 For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The jurors
    By enigma in forum Darlie Routier
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-10-2007, 06:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •