940 users online (175 members and 765 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,058

    No surprise: DNA is a dud.

    Article Published: Friday, June 04, 2004


    DNA found on JonBenét yields no match

    By Mike McPhee Karen Augé and Howard Pankratz
    Denver Post Staff Writers

    A DNA profile of blood taken from JonBenét Ramsey's underpants does not match any of the more than 1.5 million DNA profiles in the FBI's database, according to the Denver Police Department's crime lab.

    "I can tell you that the entire database has been searched, and not one profile was a match," said an officer familiar with the proceedings who did not want to be named.

    [snip]

    http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,...191170,00.html

  2. #2

    Well it seems...

    Our Foreign Faction Killers, have never been caught before. Gee they really are good!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    3,868
    They must be "foreign factory faction" suspects....you'd think they would have foreign faction DNA database to go thru also. LOL
    -
    My opinion and nothing but my opinion.

    Tor:Con Index link below. Will show you the probability of a tornado happening in your area.
    http://www.weather.com/news/tornado-torcon-index

    FEMA's link for Emergency Supplies list below or what you need to survive for three days in case help is not immediately available to you.
    http://www.ready.gov/document/family-supply-list

    You can also purchase a weather radio which will inform you of severe weather even if your electricity goes out. Runs on batteries of course.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    16

    DNA Dud

    The DNA has been a red herring all along. Dr. Lee was correct when he said, "This is not a DNA case."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Don't mess with Texas
    Posts
    297

    Talking Rice already cooked

    Quote Originally Posted by Petronella
    The DNA has been a red herring all along. Dr. Lee was correct when he said, "This is not a DNA case."

    Yep No DNA case "Rice aready cooked" Henry Lee
    Just my opinion

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    514
    Correct - this is not, has never been, and never will be a DNA case.
    Why is that significant? Simple. Because for as much T-I-M-E the killer spent with JonBenet and the things he did to her - there SHOULD be a lot of foreign DNA. There is not. There is but a teeny, weeny, microscopic speck that could have come from ANYWHERE. And did.
    It did not come from the person who killed her.
    And any DNA from her 3 family members in the house that night found on her would be explained away by any defense attorney as "belonging" there as they lived in the house with her. Easily explainable.

    So... we have never heard how much DNA they extracted from JonBenet's body and clothing that matched her father, mother or brother have we?
    There could be a plethora.
    Yet they focus soley on some teeny tiny speck found that could barely be stretched enough to call a sample - and lead you (the public) to believe that THIS is the "only" DNA found on her and at the crime scene.

    Forget the DNA angle. DNA is not a factor in this case. But plenty else is....
    This post is my opinion.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by K777angel
    Correct - this is not, has never been, and never will be a DNA case.
    You got that right. Some people are so ignorant they think just because DNA contamination was entered into the CODIS database that makes it a valid DNA case. They'll go to there graves waiting for it be be matched to a non-existant person...LOL