676 users online (59 members and 617 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    233

    Will Defense Use Reyes Arrest To Create Reasonable Doubt?

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-b...,1617888.story

    Will KC's defense see this story as a godsend to help create reasonable doubt? The fact that duct tape was used and this little girl is four years old, and possibly an eight year-old was attempted to be abducted in 2007 could offer fuel for creating the stage of SODDI. Opinions???

    Oh, this is my first thread creation....hope it is correct....

  2. #2
    I think this will be a non-issue. This guy was breaking in and trying to steal peoples children-Casey tells a different tale, and unless she personally testifies at trial-a SERIOUS MISTAKE-then her defense cannot introduce any theory that includes anything except what she has stated in her statement. This especially due to the fact that she pleaded Not Guilty and so therefore MUST testify in order to completely change the tale-she is not going to testify unless she is looking to be put out of her misery rather quickly-and to hear the GUILTY verdict returned post haste.

    ABC provided $200,000.00 to
    Casey Anthonys defense!
    The MURDERED should not be USED to pay for the MURDERERS DEFENSE!

    American Tragedy: The defense of Casey Anthony.

    Juror No. 11 somehow made the journey from Casey is the one on trial to George may be a murderer, based on how George acted on the stand? 3 years of evidence against Casey and he throws George under the bus. Makes sense?
    What evidence indicated that George might be a murderer? Anyone?
    Weren't they to ONLY consider EVIDENCE?
    This NOT GUILTY verdict throws Caylee right back into the swamp she decomposed in. Thanks to this "impartial" jury.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    233
    Quote Originally Posted by magic-cat View Post
    I think this will be a non-issue. This guy was breaking in and trying to steal peoples children-Casey tells a different tale, and unless she personally testifies at trial-a SERIOUS MISTAKE-then her defense cannot introduce any theory that includes anything except what she has stated in her statement. This especially due to the fact that she pleaded Not Guilty and so therefore MUST testify in order to completely change the tale-she is not going to testify unless she is looking to be put out of her misery rather quickly-and to hear the GUILTY verdict returned post haste.
    I don't think they would need to put her on the stand to suggest this theory. They don't have to PROVE anything happened or didn't happen, if they can get one juror to have doubt based on their suggestions. It will be up to the State to prove that it was impossible for anyone other than KC to have committed the crime of killing Caylee.

    I think the similarities of the duct tape used on a child under age 12 could possibly be enough to give most reasonable people pause. It made me question whether LE has gone back through all the evidence to see if they can find Reyes' fingerprints anywhere.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    50
    If this had happened, then why all of the elaborate lies from Casey? Why wouldn't she go to the police? Why wouldn't she just tell what happened?

    She wasn't taken by a stranger, she was murdered by her mother.



Similar Threads

  1. Has the defense created reasonable doubt?
    By butterfly1978 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 1260
    Last Post: 07-05-2011, 04:17 PM
  2. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
    By concentric in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 08:14 PM