Does this Motion Make Sense?

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

brownflower

Inactive
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
530
Reaction score
0
This is from today's news (it was posted by an Angel :blowkiss:). One of the motions for tomorrow's hearing is the following:

Baez also wants jail officials to stop monitoring and disclosing any communication between Casey Anthony and her defense team.

Click Here for the Article

Does this motion make sense? I thought that it is a given that communication between a lawyer and the client is protected and therefore is not monitored. So, why make this type of motion?

:waitasec:
 
Once again JB is asking to be set on a pedestal above everyone else. Why should he have to abide by the same rules as everyone else. After all....his "girl" is special!

:puke:
 
It does to some degree if you read section 11 on the second page. In discussing Tammy Uncer's discussion with LE concerning the event (the audio that was accidentally released in the last doc dump), Baez states:

Since no conversations between the client and her attorney occur in front of any jail personnel - the means by which this communication was obtained is highly questionable to say the least.

He seems to believe that the jail is spying on him. It should be interesting to hear a discussion concerning all of this!

Baez motion: http://www.cfnews13.com/uploadedFiles/Stories/Local/Protective Order -jail video of meeting.pdf
 
Wouldn't you hope a criminal sitting in a jail cell would be monitored 24/7? Regardless if an attorney is there or not. Who's to say she won't hypervenilliate again over news of something negative like say a possible release of a jailhouse video. All this noise comming from JB's camp has me thinking someone should monitor KC for a suicide watch the day the video is released. Those two together is a scary thing to be left alone could be dangerous or coniving from what has been said to date.
 
I will be interested to see how this motion is viewed by the judge.

I understand why lawyer/client conversations should be confidential...but that is already in place.

To me...it sounds like he is whining...like a child that tells on another child.
 
CarolinaMoon said:
It does to some degree if you read section 11 on the second page. In discussing Tammy Uncer's discussion with LE concerning the event (the audio that was accidentally released in the last doc dump), Baez states:

Since no conversations between the client and her attorney occur in front of any jail personnel - the means by which this communication was obtained is highly questionable to say the least.

He seems to believe that the jail is spying on him. It should be interesting to hear a discussion concerning all of this!

Baez motion: http://www.cfnews13.com/uploadedFiles/Stories/Local/Protective Order -jail video of meeting.pdf
Click to expand...

If he feels the jail is spying on him and his client, can't he charge them with something? Why does he have to file a motion to ask that LE do something that they by law are supposed to do anyway?

It's against the law to speed. So, if you get caught speeding aren't you handed a speeding ticket? Does the officer instead take you before the judge with a motion that you be instructed not to speed?:bang:
 
brownflower said:
If he feels the jail is spying on him and his client, can't he charge them with something? Why does he have to file a motion to ask that LE do something that they by law are supposed to do anyway?

It's against the law to speed. So, if you get caught speeding aren't you handed a speeding ticket? Does the officer instead take you before the judge with a motion that you be instructed not to speed?:bang:
Click to expand...

That's what I don't get about the motion. As you said, it doesn't make sense. He cites a bunch of legal cases about LE listening in to attorney-client phone calls and videotaping their meetings.

We all know about the release of the infamous video. Wasn't there also discussion of a copy of a surveilance video (without sound) of the meeting between Baez and Casey that day where (supposedly) Baez is all upset and Casey seems angry at him?

I read the entire motion and it only barely mentions the clinic video at all.

I'd bet we're going to hear a lot of babble about violations of the darlin' prisoner's rights!

I just hope the SA can hold his temper in!
 
CarolinaMoon said:
That's what I don't get about the motion. As you said, it doesn't make sense. He cites a bunch of legal cases about LE listening in to attorney-client phone calls and videotaping their meetings.

We all know about the release of the infamous video. Wasn't there also discussion of a copy of a surveilance video (without sound) of the meeting between Baez and Casey that day where (supposedly) Baez is all upset and Casey seems angry at him?

I read the entire motion and it only barely mentions the clinic video at all.

I'd bet we're going to hear a lot of babble about violations of the darlin' prisoner's rights!

I just hope the SA can hold his temper in!
Click to expand...

:clap:

Hmmm... I'm beginning to wonder if the InSession thread and what was posted there is related to this motion.

I'm also starting to wonder if the motion is connected to the investigation to have JB disbarred.
 
Hasn't Baez twice been serriously admonished for violating jail security and contact protocols? There is no way that the jail will ever consider not monitoring his contacts with an inmate. The policy is there principaly to insure among other things the safety of every lawyer that comes into the facility, his own stupid butt included.
 
brownflower said:
This is from today's news (it was posted by an Angel :blowkiss:). One of the motions for tomorrow's hearing is the following:

Baez also wants jail officials to stop monitoring and disclosing any communication between Casey Anthony and her defense team.

Click Here for the Article

Does this motion make sense? I thought that it is a given that communication between a lawyer and the client is protected and therefore is not monitored. So, why make this type of motion?

:waitasec:
Click to expand...

To me, he is filing this motion to smear the staff at the jail. If it will be interesting to see if he can prove they are actively monitoring attorney/client meetings.
 
faefrost said:
Hasn't Baez twice been serriously admonished for violating jail security and contact protocols? There is no way that the jail will ever consider not monitoring his contacts with an inmate. The policy is there principaly to insure among other things the safety of every lawyer that comes into the facility, his own stupid butt included.
Click to expand...

Forgive my ignorance. What exactly did JB do to receive admonishment?
 
brownflower said:
:clap:

Hmmm... I'm beginning to wonder if the InSession thread and what was posted there is related to this motion.

I'm also starting to wonder if the motion is connected to the investigation to have JB disbarred.
Click to expand...

(from Orlando Sentinel Article)
"Baez also wants jail officials to stop monitoring and disclosing any communication between Casey Anthony and her defense team." (italics mine)

For sure JB seeks no disclosure of any non-verbal communications (if we're to believe "In Session" Article).

Tragically, I believe this "ineffective counsel" has contributed to solidifying KC's defenses, which might otherwise have lessened during critical phases in her
incarceration, resulting in her being more cooperative with SA, to include going for a plea. Thanks for nothin', JB!
 
Mamabear1963 said:
I will be interested to see how this motion is viewed by the judge.

I understand why lawyer/client conversations should be confidential...but that is already in place.

To me...it sounds like he is whining...like a child that tells on another child.
Click to expand...
Reminds me of when George, in the depo, complained to Keith M. that he didn't "appreciate" the middle finger being shown to him...pathetic, all of them !
 
brownflower said:
Forgive my ignorance. What exactly did JB do to receive admonishment?
Click to expand...

On two separate occasions JB had to be told by jail personnel that he was violating procedure by having physical contact with an inmate, KC.
 
As I was scanning the list of posts...I re-read this one...and thought...

"No it doesn't make sense...nothing in the whole nutty case makes a whit of sense"
 
JB must be jonesing for a hug from his little misses.....So for that reason he would rather not be monitored...God only knows what would happen if they didn't monitor these 2...I would hate to know what might make it into her prision cell..
 
It would be a terrible thing "IF",by any stretch of the law, her rights were violated and Caylee was not given justice because evidence was thrown out due to negligence.

I try to keep in mind that her rights are the same as mine and I sure don't want anyone messing with my freedom "BUT", I DIN DOOT. She did. This woman is guilty of something. The degree is yet to be determined.
 
brownflower said:
This is from today's news (it was posted by an Angel :blowkiss:). One of the motions for tomorrow's hearing is the following:

Baez also wants jail officials to stop monitoring and disclosing any communication between Casey Anthony and her defense team.

Click Here for the Article

Does this motion make sense? I thought that it is a given that communication between a lawyer and the client is protected and therefore is not monitored. So, why make this type of motion?

:waitasec:
Click to expand...

This is like BC with his weekly "We're hoping to have a private meeting with just Casey and her family."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 173 more.
Total: 3,751 (members: 174, guests: 3,577)

Online statistics

Members online
174
Guests online
3,577
Total visitors
3,751
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,685
Messages
17,957,472
Members
228,586
Latest member
chingona361
Back
Top