1170 users online (223 members and 947 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 46
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015

    WS: JMK and the RDI Phantom Menace

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    That's putting it politely.
    Except he didn't put it there. PR did.
    Why would he bother?
    JMK is a real person. He's flesh and blood.

    He said: "I love JonBenét," and "I was with JonBenét when she died; she died accidentally."[2] When asked if he was an innocent man, he said: "No."

    "In 1984, Karr married 12-year-old Quientana Ray Shotts.[17] Karr evidently told Quientana to lie about her age, and took her out of Alabama, where they both lived, to marry her. Karr and Shotts lived together as a couple in Hamilton after their wedding,"



    "her death was an accident."

    An intruder w/ a similar JMK psychological profile that would explain many of the RDI's "properitary interest" -staging- everything from draping JB papoose style, to garrote, to redressing her undies, to covering her with white blanket. A perp like JMK might also show "loving" affection to JB to the so-called "motherly" aspects of the letter. JMK himself gave an account of many facts and choices in the case. If he's like JMK then it is b/c he "loves" JB and $118k is $100k + $18k for age of consent. and Shall be the Conqueror. There were even handwriting experts who alleged a match between the note and JMK exemplars.

    RDI's tell me something, based on JMK's statements and sexual appetites, and fantasies, let's say that while the R's were all sleeping UPSTAIRS JB and JMK were in the basement 10pm Dec 25, 1996.It's dark and it's just the two of them. What happens next?

    Would you trust yoru 6 y/o daughter alone with JMK in the basement of your house at night, while you sleep upstairs?

    He looks like the Terminator model t-1000

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,970
    I can't imagine a person(?) like JMK killing JB.
    There's a long way from fantasy to action sometimes and I think it applies here.
    My opinion on JMK is:
    He's a coward,but he likes to talk a lot,oops,to whine a lot.

    Put JMK and JR in the same room.JMK would p** his pants IMO.
    The rice is already cooked...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,970
    One more thing and it's only my opinion,
    I think someone like JB would have intimidated someone like JMK.It was easy for him to have all those fantasies and talk about her because she was already dead.Him and her in the same room,I think that would have freaked him out.She had a strong personality,I don't think he would have been able to dominate her,and I don't mean physically.

    Dunno how to explain it better.
    The rice is already cooked...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    JMK is a real person. He's flesh and blood.

    He said: "I love JonBenét," and "I was with JonBenét when she died; she died accidentally."[2] When asked if he was an innocent man, he said: "No."

    "In 1984, Karr married 12-year-old Quientana Ray Shotts.[17] Karr evidently told Quientana to lie about her age, and took her out of Alabama, where they both lived, to marry her. Karr and Shotts lived together as a couple in Hamilton after their wedding,"
    I don't think you quite get what we mean. He's certainly not "innocent" in the true sense. That much is sure. He's done something, all right. Just not this.

    "her death was an accident."

    An intruder w/ a similar JMK psychological profile that would explain many of the RDI's "properitary interest" -staging- everything from draping JB papoose style, to garrote, to redressing her undies, to covering her with white blanket. A perp like JMK might also show "loving" affection to JB to the so-called "motherly" aspects of the letter. JMK himself gave an account of many facts and choices in the case. If he's like JMK then it is b/c he "loves" JB and $118k is $100k + $18k for age of consent. and Shall be the Conqueror. There were even handwriting experts who alleged a match between the note and JMK exemplars.
    You're digging up old bones, voynich. This one's dead and buried. It never should have seen the light of day. JMK was the DA's gift to the Rs, nothing more. That's not just my opinion, either.

    RDI's tell me something, based on JMK's statements and sexual appetites, and fantasies, let's say that while the R's were all sleeping UPSTAIRS JB and JMK were in the basement 10pm Dec 25, 1996.It's dark and it's just the two of them. What happens next?

    Would you trust your 6 y/o daughter alone with JMK in the basement of your house at night, while you sleep upstairs?

    He looks like the Terminator model t-1000
    I wouldn't trust him as far as I can throw a Star Destroyer barehanded. But his story just has too many holes in it.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    I don't think you quite get what we mean. He's certainly not "innocent" in the true sense. That much is sure. He's done something, all right. Just not this.



    You're digging up old bones, voynich. This one's dead and buried. It never should have seen the light of day. JMK was the DA's gift to the Rs, nothing more. That's not just my opinion, either.



    I wouldn't trust him as far as I can throw a Star Destroyer barehanded. But his story just has too many holes in it.
    Oh I know it's several years out now, but in response to Ame's questions "why would an intruder drape JB papoose style, redress her, wipe her up" my reply is look at JMK -- he was "in love" or whatever his exact words were.

    If JMK could be in love w/JB, who's to say that the kidnapper pedophile also was not somehow in love w/JB? He silenced her w/a head blow but then felt somehow remorseful. Stranger things have happened in the world of crime

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,299
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    Oh I know it's several years out now, but in response to Ame's questions "why would an intruder drape JB papoose style, redress her, wipe her up" my reply is look at JMK -- he was "in love" or whatever his exact words were.

    If JMK could be in love w/JB, who's to say that the kidnapper pedophile also was not somehow in love w/JB? He silenced her w/a head blow but then felt somehow remorseful. Stranger things have happened in the world of crime

    I happen to agree with you that the intruder may have a JMK-like interest in JBR. It seems JBR was to be kidnapped by someone who coveted her but something may have gone wrong.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    8,022
    JMK, like all who view children as sexual objects, is sick and perverted. But he did not do this. Believe me, if there was one shred of physical evidence linking him to this crime, that house, that child, that city and state on that date, Lacy & her dream team would have pounced on him with an indictment faster than a rabbit gets .....
    The fact that the "case" against him fizzled out like yesterday's party balloons speaks volumes about the inability to link him to this crime, even by people who REALLY, REALLY wanted to be able to pin this on him.

    I am sure he wasn't the only pedophile who fantasized about being with JB in her last moments. He was just stupid enough to go public with his sick fantasies. He offered NOTHING that wasn't already public knowledge for years.
    THIS time, we get it RIGHT!

    This post is my constitutionally-protected opinion. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    JMK, like all who view children as sexual objects, is sick and perverted. But he did not do this. Believe me, if there was one shred of physical evidence linking him to this crime, that house, that child, that city and state on that date, Lacy & her dream team would have pounced on him with an indictment faster than a rabbit gets .....
    The fact that the "case" against him fizzled out like yesterday's party balloons speaks volumes about the inability to link him to this crime, even by people who REALLY, REALLY wanted to be able to pin this on him.

    I am sure he wasn't the only pedophile who fantasized about being with JB in her last moments. He was just stupid enough to go public with his sick fantasies. He offered NOTHING that wasn't already public knowledge for years.
    Hi, I'm not saying JMKDI, only that someone w/JMK mindset might show loving interest after killing JB. Why would IDI "loving" cover JB w/blanket? B/c he was in love w/JB and regretted his actions.

    The DNA + linguistic evidence in RN + loving care she showed to JB = JMK-similar IDI

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Somewhere In Time
    Posts
    5,838
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    Hi, I'm not saying JMKDI, only that someone w/JMK mindset might show loving interest after killing JB. Why would IDI "loving" cover JB w/blanket? B/c he was in love w/JB and regretted his actions.

    The DNA + linguistic evidence in RN + loving care she showed to JB = JMK-similar IDI
    The fibers + linguistic evidence in RN + loving care showed to JB = RDI
    "This time we get it right."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Ames View Post
    The fibers + linguistic evidence in RN + loving care showed to JB = RDI
    so it's fiber v.s dna


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Ames View Post
    The fibers + linguistic evidence in RN + loving care showed to JB = RDI
    Unsourced DNA + Unsourced Tape + Unsourced Cord + Unsourced Handwriting + Zero R Criminality (they had Ozzie and Harriet Syndrome) + Zero Pathology + Zero Socioeconomic = IDI

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,970
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    Hi, I'm not saying JMKDI, only that someone w/JMK mindset might show loving interest after killing JB. Why would IDI "loving" cover JB w/blanket? B/c he was in love w/JB and regretted his actions.

    The DNA + linguistic evidence in RN + loving care she showed to JB = JMK-similar IDI

    Why would a loving idi write such a stupid note that makes no sense?
    Why not fill it with i love JB so much and all the stuff we've seen in JMK's e-mails?
    The rice is already cooked...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Somewhere In Time
    Posts
    5,838
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    so it's fiber v.s dna
    No, actually it is....

    Fiber that we KNOW was left at the crimescene the night of the murder

    VS

    DNA that we DON'T KNOW WHEN it was left, or by who
    "This time we get it right."

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    Oh I know it's several years out now, but in response to Ame's questions "why would an intruder drape JB papoose style, redress her, wipe her up" my reply is look at JMK -- he was "in love" or whatever his exact words were.

    If JMK could be in love w/JB, who's to say that the kidnapper pedophile also was not somehow in love w/JB? He silenced her w/a head blow but then felt somehow remorseful. Stranger things have happened in the world of crime
    They all "love" their victims, voynich. But I think madeleine is right. Look, the idea crossed my mind to be a smart-a** and say that JMK couldn't have overpowered JB because he's too much of a weakling. Madeleine beat me to it. JMK was all talk. He didn't have the courage or the brains to do this.

    I do my best to keep an open mind, just not so open that my brain falls out.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    JMK, like all who view children as sexual objects, is sick and perverted. But he did not do this. Believe me, if there was one shred of physical evidence linking him to this crime, that house, that child, that city and state on that date, Lacy & her dream team would have pounced on him with an indictment faster than a rabbit gets .....
    The fact that the "case" against him fizzled out like yesterday's party balloons speaks volumes about the inability to link him to this crime, even by people who REALLY, REALLY wanted to be able to pin this on him.

    I am sure he wasn't the only pedophile who fantasized about being with JB in her last moments. He was just stupid enough to go public with his sick fantasies. He offered NOTHING that wasn't already public knowledge for years.
    Let me tell you something, DeeDee, and I know people may disagree with this, but when they started parading him around, I was legitimately afraid that they would try to pin it on him regardless of evidence. As we all found out, I had nothing to fear. The DA's office isn't even bright enough to FRAME the guy who said 'I did it!" And that's a direct quote from the book!
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. TX TX - The Texarkana Phantom, 1946
    By shadowangel in forum Cold Cases
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 03-12-2017, 07:55 AM
  2. Phantom Clowns Are Back!
    By Blackwatch in forum Missing Archives
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-17-2008, 12:15 AM