1077 users online (269 members and 808 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 28 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 419
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,425

    Ron C. # 10

    Stay on topic of this thread - "Ron C" not LE, Misty etc.. etc.
    :Banane59: Pekingese "Best Of Show" 2012

  2. #2
    gypsyblue's Avatar
    gypsyblue is offline this is not what Haleigh would have wanted
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    sin city
    Posts
    2,723
    Bowling said it takes rock-solid alibis before detectives can eliminate anyone and those have not been established. He said the best that can be done is assign degrees of suspicion to people.

    “Where is the responsibility in saying somebody is not a suspect?” he said.

    Im thinkin this proves that someones werk alibi isn't real solid.......I would think RC who was supposed to be working all night would be the easiest to clear with a work alibi....guess not.
    Also RC states himself that they shouldnt be looking back at what happened 7 yrs ago...12/12/2002 - POSSESSION OF COCAINE, POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, POSSESSION OF CANNABIS UNDER 20 GRAMS, POSSESSION OF DRUG WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION, POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA.
    guess hes claiming responsibility for this charge after all and it was not a set up......
    jmooc
    QQQQQQQQQQ~nightmare the cat

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,098
    Posting all of this again will take up a lot of space, but I have a number of questions that have never really been addressed regarding this record.

    1. Why do people say there were no convictions when there were NUMEROUS guilty pleas, fines leveled, probation given, community service assigned, rehab type courses required etc. ALL of those are technically convictions to my knowledge.

    2. Why is much of this record NOT included in most of the other times that it has been posted?
    ******EDITED TO ADD****This is the LATER part of his record only.....there are numerous additional charges preceding these which start in 2004---as referred to in the preceding post regarding 2002 charges.

    3. Why is it stated that these charges were all from years ago before he had custody when the dates clearly show that they are NOT?

    4. Also of note there are at least 10 times here when apparently RON HAD GIVEN AN INCORRECT ADDRESS and notices were recorded as unable to be delivered.


    File Date: 2004-11-16 Judge: A W NICHOLS III
    Defense Atty: FELICIANO, SHARON
    Defendant
    CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES
    Date # Docket Description
    2004-11-16 1 ARREST REPORT - PCSO EDGAR (ARREST 11/12/04)
    2004-11-16 1 POSSESSION OF CANNABIS IN EXCESS OF 20 GRAMS
    2004-11-16 1 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA
    2004-11-16 1 MAINTAINING A DRUG VEHICLE
    2004-11-16 3 TRAFFIC CITATION - #7877-DBJ 2
    2004-11-16 4 AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY
    2004-11-16 5 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR 1ST APP HEARING
    2004-11-16 6 APPEARANCE BOND - UNSECURED $ 2,012
    2004-12-03 7 INFORMATION (CT 1-POSSESSION OF CANNABIS IN EXCESS
    2004-12-03 7 OF 20 GRAMS)
    2004-12-07 8 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (01-07-2005)
    2005-01-07 9 ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, SWORN, ARRAIGNED,
    2005-01-07 9 PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED, ENTERED PLEA OF NOT GUILTY,
    2005-01-07 9 SET FOR PRE TRIAL 02/03/2005.
    2005-01-07 10 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS
    2005-01-07 10 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED INDIGENT
    2005-01-25 17 PUBLIC DEFENDER, DEFT SCREENED BY TREATMENT AND DEEMED
    2005-01-25 17 APPROPRIATE FOR DRUG COURT, DEFT DECLINED THE DRUG COURT
    2005-02-03 18 ADI - LEVEL II
    2005-03-03 20 DEFT SWORN, W/D FORMER PLEA, PLEAD NOLO A/C, ADVISED
    2005-03-03 20 MAX PENALTY 5 YRS DOC &/OR $5000 FINE, PSI WAIVED,
    2005-03-03 20 PLEA ACCEPTED, SENTENCING SET SAME DAY
    2005-03-03 20 ADJUDICATION OF GUILT WITHHELD
    2005-03-03 20 $370.00 COURT COSTS (6 MONTHS TO PAY)
    2005-03-03 20 ADI PROGRAM - LEVEL II
    2005-09-08 21 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF ADI LEVEL II PROGRAM
    ************************************************** ****************
    Date # Docket Description
    2006-11-14 1 TRAFFIC CITATION - #6417-EEN 3 PCSO OFF/MANNING
    2006-11-14 1 LEAVING THE SCENE OF ACCIDENT INVOLVING INJURIES
    2006-12-12 2 MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE TO COUNTY COURT
    2006-12-19 3 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO COUNTY COURT
    ************************************************** ****************
    2006-08-01 1 ARREST REPORT - PCSO/ MAY (ARREST 07-29-2006)
    2006-08-01 1 TRESPASS
    2006-08-01 2 AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY
    2006-08-01 3 $504.00 CHUCK'S BAIL BOND POSTED - #00601638 07-29-06
    2006-08-11 4 INFORMATION (TRESPASS)
    2006-08-31 6 ARR MIN: DEFT PRES, ADJ INS P D APPT MACK BRUNTON
    2006-08-31 6 ARR ENT PLEA OF NOT GUILTY - PRE TRIAL SET 10/04/2006
    2006-08-31 7 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS
    2006-08-31 7 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED INDIGENT
    2006-08-31 7 $40.00 APPLICATION FEE IMPOSED
    2006-08-31 8 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER
    2006-08-31 9 PRE-TRIAL ORDER (10-04-2006)
    2006-09-06 10 NOTICE TO BONDSMAN (10-04-2006)
    2006-10-04 11 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY MACK BRUNTON
    2006-10-04 11 STATE AND DEFENSE ANNOUNCED READY FOR TRIAL
    2006-10-04 11 CASE SET FOR NON JURY TRIAL 10/30/2006
    2006-10-04 12 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
    2006-10-04 13 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (10-30-2006)
    2006-10-06 14 NOTICE TO BONDSMAN (10-30-2006)
    2006-10-10 15 STATE ATTORNEY WITNESS SUBPOENA ISSUED:
    2006-10-10 15 WILLIAM P MORRIS
    2006-10-10 16 STATE ATTORNEY WITNESS SUBPOENA ISSUED:
    2006-10-10 16 DS JOHN MAY
    2006-10-16 17 STATE ATTORNEY WITNESS SUBPOENA RETURNED SERVED:
    2006-10-16 17 WILLIAM P MORRIS
    2006-10-16 18 STATE ATTORNEY WITNESS SUBPOENA RETURNED SERVED:
    2006-10-16 18 DS JOHN MAY
    2006-10-16 20 STATE ATTORNEY WITNESS SUBPOENA RETURNED SERVED:
    2006-10-16 19 MS. TAMMY PINKNEY
    2006-10-26 21 AMENDED INFO (TRESPASS ON PROPERTY OTHER THAN A
    2006-10-26 21 STRUCTURE OR CONVEYANCE)
    2006-10-30 22 TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES ATT BY MACK BRUNTON
    2006-10-30 22 FOR NON JURY TRIAL- STATE REP BY DAVID HOLLANDER
    2006-10-30 22 DEFT W-DREW FORMER PLEA - ENT PLEA OF NOLO CONTENDERE
    2006-10-30 22 TO TRESPASS, DEFT SWORN, PLEA ACCEPTED,
    2006-10-30 22 ADJUDGED GUILTY
    2006-10-30 22 PROB HRDS 6 MONTHS
    2006-10-30 22 1 DAY PCJ WITH CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED OF 1 DAY
    2006-10-30 22 $273.00 FINE AND COST
    2006-10-30 22 $ 40.00 PD FEE SUSPENDED
    2006-10-30 22 RANDOM DRUG TEST
    2006-10-30 23 WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE TO
    2006-10-30 23 CRIMINAL CHARGES IN COUNTY COURT
    2006-10-30 24 ORDER OF PROBATION
    2007-01-17 25 $ 60.00 FINE AND COST PAYMENT 11/14/2006
    2007-02-07 26 SUCCESSFUL TERMINATION OF PROBATION
    2007-02-14 27 $120.00 FINE AND COST PAYMENT 12/28/2006
    2007-03-16 28 $ 93.00 FINE AND COST BAL PAID 01/25/2007
    ************************************************** ****************
    2006-11-14 1 TRAFFIC CITATION - #6417EEN-3 PCSO/ MANNING 10-30-06
    2006-11-14 1 LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT
    2006-12-12 2 MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE TO COUNTY COURT
    2006-12-19 3 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE TO COUNTY COURT
    2006-12-19 3 FROM CIRCUIT COURT 06-002339-CF53
    2006-12-19 4 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (01-23-2007)
    2007-01-02 5 NOTICE RETURNED UNEXECUTED - NO SUCH NUMBER
    2007-01-05 6 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (01-23-2007)
    2007-01-12 7 NOTICE RETURNED UNEXECUTED - NO SUCH NUMBER
    2007-01-23 8 ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: DEFT NOT PRESENT IN COURT
    2007-01-23 8 COURT ORDERED CAPIAS
    2007-01-23 8 BOND SET AT $1004 FIRM
    2007-01-23 9 CAPIAS ISSUED - BOND SET AT $1004 FIRM
    2007-01-25 10 CAPIAS RECALLED - CASE SET FOR ARRAIGNMENT 02/06/2007
    2007-01-25 10 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (02-06-2007) IN OFFICE
    2007-01-25 11 CHANGE OF ADDRESS
    2007-01-26 12 CAPIAS RETURNED
    2007-02-06 13 ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: ON MOTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THE
    2007-02-06 13 THE CASE WAS ORDERED NOLLE PROSEQUI IN OPEN COURT
    2007-02-06 13 INFRACTION DISMISSED CIT # 6416EEN2 - CARELESS DRIVING
    2007-02-06 13 INFRACTION DISMISSED CIT # 6418EEN4 - OPERATE ATV
    2007-02-06 13 W/O HELMET
    2007-02-06 14 WAIVER OF COUNSEL
    ************************************************** ****************
    2007-04-03 1 COMPLAINT FILED: PCSO/ WALTER 04-02-07
    2007-04-03 1 AFFRAY
    2007-04-23 2 INFORMATION (AFFRAY)
    2007-04-23 3 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (05/10/2007)CERTIFIED
    2007-05-10 4 ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: COURT ORDERED CASE CONTINUED
    2007-05-10 4 TO NEXT ARRAIGNMENT 06/12/2007
    2007-05-10 5 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (06-12-2007)
    2007-05-18 6 NOTICE RETURNED UNEXECUTED - UNCLAIMED
    2007-06-12 7 ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: COURT ORDERED CASE CONTINUED
    2007-06-12 7 TO NEXT ARRAIGNMENT 07/12/2007
    2007-06-12 8 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (07-12-2007)
    2007-06-14 9 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (07-12-2007) IN OFFICE
    2007-07-12 10 ARR MIN: DEFT PRES, ADJ INS P D APPT MACK BRUNTON
    2007-07-12 10 ARR ENT PLEA OF NOT GUILTY - PRE TRIAL SET 08/22/2007
    2007-07-12 11 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS
    2007-07-12 11 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED INDIGENT
    2007-07-12 11 $40.00 APPLICATION FEE IMPOSED
    2007-07-12 12 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER
    2007-07-12 13 PRE-TRIAL ORDER (08-22-2007)
    2007-08-22 14 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY MACK BRUNTON
    2007-08-22 14 ON MOTION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL, COURT ORDERED CASE
    2007-08-22 14 CONTINUED TO 09/19/2007
    2007-08-22 15 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (09-19-2007) IN COURT
    2007-09-19 16 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT FILED
    2007-09-19 16 AND ACCEPTED
    2007-09-19 17 DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT
    2007-09-19 17 10 HOURS COMMUNITY SERVICE
    2007-09-19 17 $50.00 COST OF PROSECUTION
    2007-09-28 18 MEMO FROM HRDS: DEFT COMPLETED THE CONDITIONS OF HIS
    2007-09-28 18 PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM
    2007-10-18 19 NOTICE OF SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF DEFERRED
    2007-10-18 19 PROSECUTION AGREEMENT
    2007-11-28 20 $100.00 PAYMENT MADE TO CASE 09/18/2007
    ************************************************** ****************
    2007-11-14 1 WILDLIFE CITATION - #132466-C GFFC/ EASON 11-02-07
    2007-11-14 1 POSSESSION OF MODERN FIREARM DURING MUZZLELOADING
    2007-11-14 1 SEASON
    2007-11-14 1 TRESPASS
    2007-11-14 2 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (12-18-2007)
    2007-11-29 3 NOTICE RETURNED UNEXECUTED
    2007-11-29 4 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (12/18/2007)CORRECT ADDRESS
    2007-12-18 5 ARR MIN: DEFT PRES IN COURT WAIVING RIGHT TO COUNSEL
    2007-12-18 5 ARR ENT PLEA OF NOLO CONTENDERE TO CT I - POSS OF
    2007-12-18 5 MODERN FIREARM DURING MUZZELOADING SEASON - CT II -
    2007-12-18 5 TRESPASS - NOLLE PROSEQUI - DEFT SWORN, PLEA ACCEPTED
    2007-12-18 5 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED GUILTY
    2007-12-18 5 $273.00 FINE AND COST SUSPENDED
    2007-12-18 5 24 HOURS HOUSE ARREST
    2007-12-18 6 WAIVER OF COUNSEL
    2007-12-18 7 WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE TO
    2007-12-18 7 CRIMINAL CHARGES IN COUNTY COURT
    2008-01-08 8 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE CT I
    Last edited by raeann; 08-10-2009 at 10:35 AM. Reason: NOTATION ABOUT EARLIER PART OF RECORD

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,098
    For those who want the more complete record....Here is the prior to 2004 record that I copied from the documents link....it notes that it is ABRIDGED which may very well mean there are additional charges and court decisions that were edited out of this version.

    ***************
    Ronald Lemyles Cummings records (abridged):

    10/24/2001 - Assault Complaint

    12/12/2002 - POSSESSION OF COCAINE, POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, POSSESSION OF CANNABIS UNDER 20 GRAMS, POSSESSION OF DRUG WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION, POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA.
    Sentence: maybe someone can translate. These are the notes from the trial: THE CASE WAS ORDERED NOLLE PROSEQUI IN OPEN COURT ANNOUNCEMENT OF NOLLE PROSEQUI - ENT CIR CT MIN

    12/12/2002 - ATTEMPTING TO TAKE DEER BY GUN AND LIGHT AT NIGHT
    Notes:
    2003-01-23 5 CRIMINAL CHARGES IN COUNTY COURT
    2003-01-23 6 ADJ OF GUILT AND PLACING DEFENDANT CT I
    2003-01-23 6 ON PROBATION AND SUCCESSFUL TERMINATION OF PROBATION
    2003-01-23 7 ADJ OF GUILT AND PLACING DEFENDANT CT II
    2003-01-23 7 ON PROBATION AND SUCCESSFUL TERMINATION OF PROBATION
    2003-03-04 8 $188.00 FINE PAID 02/18/2003
    2003-03-04 9 $ 25.00 COURT FACILITY FEE PAID 02/18/2003
    2003-03-04 10 $ 25.00 WILDLIFE ALERT FUND PAYMENT 02/18/2003

    ************
    Prior to these charges which begin in 2001, I believe other previous charges would be part of his juvenile record which, of course, is unavailable to us.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    Quote Originally Posted by gypsyblue View Post
    Bowling said it takes rock-solid alibis before detectives can eliminate anyone and those have not been established. He said the best that can be done is assign degrees of suspicion to people.

    “Where is the responsibility in saying somebody is not a suspect?” he said.

    Im thinkin this proves that someones werk alibi isn't real solid.......I would think RC who was supposed to be working all night would be the easiest to clear with a work alibi....guess not.
    Also RC states himself that they shouldnt be looking back at what happened 7 yrs ago...12/12/2002 - POSSESSION OF COCAINE, POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, POSSESSION OF CANNABIS UNDER 20 GRAMS, POSSESSION OF DRUG WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION, POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA.
    guess hes claiming responsibility for this charge after all and it was not a set up......
    jmooc
    How in the world can you think that someone's work alibi isn't that solid. That is one of the only facts that we have in this case. In the article you quote this was stated: Cummings was at work the night his daughter vanished and came home as the 911 call to authorities was being made.

    http://www.jacksonville.com/news/met...6_months_later

    Whether or not he was at work has been confirmed by LE, it has been stated from the beginning that he was present for his shift and he got home as the 911 call was being made. If you are of the opinion that LE feels he wasn't at work and PDM Bridge is lying I really would like to read a link to support that information.

    If it is your opinion that something happened to Haleigh prior to Ronald going to work and he went to his shift after said event....then fine, say that. I do not think it is fair that people keep insisting RC was not at work when LE tells he that they confirmed and he was at work??
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,098
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    How in the world can you think that someone's work alibi isn't that solid. That is one of the only facts that we have in this case. In the article you quote this was stated: Cummings was at work the night his daughter vanished and came home as the 911 call to authorities was being made.

    http://www.jacksonville.com/news/met...6_months_later

    Whether or not he was at work has been confirmed by LE, it has been stated from the beginning that he was present for his shift and he got home as the 911 call was being made. If you are of the opinion that LE feels he wasn't at work and PDM Bridge is lying I really would like to read a link to support that information.

    If it is your opinion that something happened to Haleigh prior to Ronald going to work and he went to his shift after said event....then fine, say that. I do not think it is fair that people keep insisting RC was not at work when LE tells he that they confirmed and he was at work??

    BBM

    This is actually a new "version" of the story.....It is clear from the 911 call that Ron was ALREADY there when it was made....and the story from both he and MC has always been either 1) that she was standing in the door waiting on him to get home, but not on the phone and/or 2) that she had made several calls to him that he didn't bother to answer and/or 3) other assorted versions but NEVER -- until now -- have they said MC was already on the phone with 911 when Ron arrived.

  7. #7
    gypsyblue's Avatar
    gypsyblue is offline this is not what Haleigh would have wanted
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    sin city
    Posts
    2,723
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    How in the world can you think that someone's work alibi isn't that solid. That is one of the only facts that we have in this case. In the article you quote this was stated: Cummings was at work the night his daughter vanished and came home as the 911 call to authorities was being made.

    http://www.jacksonville.com/news/met...6_months_later

    Whether or not he was at work has been confirmed by LE, it has been stated from the beginning that he was present for his shift and he got home as the 911 call was being made. If you are of the opinion that LE feels he wasn't at work and PDM Bridge is lying I really would like to read a link to support that information.

    If it is your opinion that something happened to Haleigh prior to Ronald going to work and he went to his shift after said event....then fine, say that. I do not think it is fair that people keep insisting RC was not at work when LE tells he that they confirmed and he was at work??
    ~BBM~
    this sentence from a reporter, is recapping the story and also states RC came home as the 911 call to authorities was being made.....wrong.
    Speaking of links, I have yet to see a link to where LE states RC was at work his entire shift and what those hours were.......and I am of the belief something "could" have happened prior to his shift, yet my post was not about that..... jmooc
    QQQQQQQQQQ~nightmare the cat

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    Quote Originally Posted by raeann View Post
    BBM

    This is actually a new "version" of the story.....It is clear from the 911 call that Ron was ALREADY there when it was made....and the story from both he and MC has always been either 1) that she was standing in the door waiting on him to get home, but not on the phone and/or 2) that she had made several calls to him that he didn't bother to answer and/or 3) other assorted versions but NEVER -- until now -- have they said MC was already on the phone with 911 when Ron arrived.

    If I am reading the article correctly a reporter states that RC came home as the 911 call were being made so it didn't come from LE or RC and MC. So if there is a "new version of the story" it didn't come from RC or MC or LE.

    I can appreciate the argument that something may have happened to Haleigh before RC went to work, I don't agree with that opinion but it has not been ruled out by LE. LE did however state that RC was at work, do we not agree on that?
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,098
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    If I am reading the article correctly a reporter states that RC came home as the 911 call were being made so it didn't come from LE or RC and MC. So if there is a "new version of the story" it didn't come from RC or MC or LE.

    I can appreciate the argument that something may have happened to Haleigh before RC went to work, I don't agree with that opinion but it has not been ruled out by LE. LE did however state that RC was at work, do we not agree on that?
    I haven't seen many, if any at all, posters who don't believe that he went to work at some point during that night. When and for how long is the issue that is up for debate, and LE has never stated their information on this. I am sure they are well aware of what those times may be. It is still possible that what happened to Haleigh occurred either before he went to work, or after he got off of work. imoo

  10. #10
    gypsyblue's Avatar
    gypsyblue is offline this is not what Haleigh would have wanted
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    sin city
    Posts
    2,723
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    If I am reading the article correctly a reporter states that RC came home as the 911 call were being made so it didn't come from LE or RC and MC. So if there is a "new version of the story" it didn't come from RC or MC or LE.

    I can appreciate the argument that something may have happened to Haleigh before RC went to work, I don't agree with that opinion but it has not been ruled out by LE. LE did however state that RC was at work, do we not agree on that?
    ~BBM~ LE has never stated that RC was at work his entire shift, nor those hours of his shift. Bowling said it takes rock-solid alibis before detectives can eliminate anyone and those have not been established. He said the best that can be done is assign degrees of suspicion to people......jmooc
    QQQQQQQQQQ~nightmare the cat


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,832
    Quote Originally Posted by gypsyblue View Post
    Bowling said it takes rock-solid alibis before detectives can eliminate anyone and those have not been established. He said the best that can be done is assign degrees of suspicion to people.

    “Where is the responsibility in saying somebody is not a suspect?” he said.

    Im thinkin this proves that someones werk alibi isn't real solid.......I would think RC who was supposed to be working all night would be the easiest to clear with a work alibi....guess not.
    Also RC states himself that they shouldnt be looking back at what happened 7 yrs ago...12/12/2002 - POSSESSION OF COCAINE, POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, POSSESSION OF CANNABIS UNDER 20 GRAMS, POSSESSION OF DRUG WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION, POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA.
    guess hes claiming responsibility for this charge after all and it was not a set up......
    jmooc
    LE officers vindicated for setting RC up on multiple drug charges by the perp himself...news at eleven.


    Hopefully that will stop the wild baseless accusations against honest hard working LE officers here and elsewhere.

    The alibi....always had concerns the timing wasn't solid. There's my sign.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    I follow what you both are saying....lol. Is there correct information about what the shift was supposed to be? If I might add and ask, if the AC repairman was at the home after or around 5 and Misty was at the trailer giving the kids dinner out on the front porch, do you think RC was there at this time?
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,832
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    I follow what you both are saying....lol. Is there correct information about what the shift was supposed to be? If I might add and ask, if the AC repairman was at the home after or around 5 and Misty was at the trailer giving the kids dinner out on the front porch, do you think RC was there at this time?
    elle - I do not think we can assume that those children were actually there until we actually have a reliable witness to it. So far, IMO we do not. We have yet to hear whether the A/C man saw HaLeigh.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - FACTS-Just the FACTS- LIST ONLY- NO DISCUSSION -FACTS ONLY

    In the link I posted above ....in the facts thread.....it states that RC's work schedule is 2nd shift 4:30 to 3:00am...is this false?
    Last edited by KateB; 04-26-2015 at 10:59 PM. Reason: repair url tag.
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  15. #15
    gypsyblue's Avatar
    gypsyblue is offline this is not what Haleigh would have wanted
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    sin city
    Posts
    2,723
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    I follow what you both are saying....lol. Is there correct information about what the shift was supposed to be? If I might add and ask, if the AC repairman was at the home after or around 5 and Misty was at the trailer giving the kids dinner out on the front porch, do you think RC was there at this time?
    No, I am of the belief he was elsewhere, the elswhere is what I find to be important.....but thats me.......If it is proven to be that he was at work at that time, then I still think something could have happened after Haleigh stepped off of that bus....I also do not rule out the fact that even while he was at work, that rules him innocent, as I feel there are suspicious areas near pdm.......again his overuse of "I was at work", to me, has been a bit overkill..... jmooc
    QQQQQQQQQQ~nightmare the cat

Page 1 of 28 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast