Some people do not "get it". In criminal cases, the standard for conviction is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and in capital cases, there should be no lingering doubt.
Does anyone really believe that a fire investigator (alleged expert) who almost always finds arson (1500 cases) should be trusted?
The point is -- for those who don't get it -- Cameron should not have been imprisoned much less executed.
Who here would have convicted him?
It's not what a man knows that makes him a fool, it's what he does know that ain't so. .... Josh Billings