683 users online (94 members and 589 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,231

    New Shocking Info on the questioning of Misty's Sister-in-law.

    Nancy Grace: Breaking reports investigators question stepmom Misty Croslin's sister-in-law for 14 hours! She's reportedly asked if she or her husband—Misty’s brother—helped Misty hide Haleigh! All the shocking developments tonight!

    http://www.facebook.com/NancyGraceHLN?ref=nf

    This seems pretty significant to me IMO! If they didn't think this sighting was credible then why would they be asking questions like this?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,701
    Didn't Lindsy already reveal that, a few days ago?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Hinky Hollow
    Posts
    15,013
    LE has stated the "sighting" was NOT connected to the questioning.
    If there's hink....there must be stink.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,247
    Quote Originally Posted by WillenFan21 View Post
    Nancy Grace: Breaking reports investigators question stepmom Misty Croslin's sister-in-law for 14 hours! She's reportedly asked if she or her husband—Misty’s brother—helped Misty hide Haleigh! All the shocking developments tonight!

    http://www.facebook.com/NancyGraceHLN?ref=nf

    This seems pretty significant to me IMO! If they didn't think this sighting was credible then why would they be asking questions like this?
    Regardless of sightings, I suppose that they would have to question anybody that Misty pointed fingers at.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    672
    Hold the phone...

    NG says "breaking news" ...and somebody actually fell for it?


    ROFL!!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,832
    Quote Originally Posted by debs View Post
    Didn't Lindsy already reveal that, a few days ago?
    Yep. Old news, not shocking and they would be remiss if they didn't ask that as part of standard questioning of anyone in this case!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Hinky Hollow
    Posts
    15,013
    And will Nancy really cover this or change it at the last minute again......lol. I think she tricks us into watching.
    If there's hink....there must be stink.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    7,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave AHFB View Post
    Hold the phone...

    NG says "breaking news" ...and somebody actually fell for it?


    ROFL!!!!
    "BOMBSHELL!!!! Breaking news tonight."
    Okay, then.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    103
    Nancy's shows ARE breaking news and bombshells to most of the viewing audience. Not everyone is online or on websleuths getting more news than Nancy and getting it first. Geez.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,526
    NG has Bride-to-be vanishes to be aired tonight on her website. http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/nancy.grace/
    I think she is a day behind on her face-book comments. Unless it's something else?


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I am here!
    Posts
    1,807
    I am assuming that if the sighting of HC in MA is not connected to the questioning, that it wasn't really HC that was seen.

    Is there a way to trace the anonymous phone call into crime hotlines.
    If it doesn't make sense, it is a LIE ........Judge Judy

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,701
    Quote Originally Posted by lil momma View Post
    I am assuming that if the sighting of HC in MA is not connected to the questioning, that it wasn't really HC that was seen.

    Is there a way to trace the anonymous phone call into crime hotlines.
    The calls went to media outlets; not to crimestoppers or 911.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    VA, USA
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by debs View Post
    The calls went to media outlets; not to crimestoppers or 911.
    that tells me all i need to know. could have been anyone, anywhere. Could have even been police to see what type of reaction they would get from MC & RC, or for cause to go up there and question MC's brother and SIL.

    could have been Misty herself since things have been getting really hot for her lately.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I am here!
    Posts
    1,807
    Quote Originally Posted by debs View Post
    The calls went to media outlets; not to crimestoppers or 911.
    OH, i must have missed that one...ok...enough said..........

    Thank you!
    If it doesn't make sense, it is a LIE ........Judge Judy

  15. #15
    Kimberlyd125's Avatar
    Kimberlyd125 is offline Softball is for everyone. Fast pitch is for athletes.
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    16,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Atomic View Post
    Nancy's shows ARE breaking news and bombshells to most of the viewing audience. Not everyone is online or on websleuths getting more news than Nancy and getting it first. Geez.
    Well...most of her "Breaking News" and "Bombshells" are not Breaking News or Bombshells to her regular viewers. Don't get me wrong, I love Nancy but I get really peeved when she says that and then reports on the exact same thing almost word for word that she reported on the night before. And sometimes even the night before that. If it is new information, then use those words. If it is just warmed up leftovers from the night before, maybe those words should not be used.

    She did that a lot on Caylee's case too.

    IMO It's only breaking news the first time it's "broke".

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 305
    Last Post: 01-13-2010, 09:17 PM
  2. Replies: 141
    Last Post: 11-03-2009, 12:35 AM