SleuthTheTruth
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 219
- Reaction score
- -3
From: http://www.wftv.com/news/20907568/detail.html:
"The judge ruled Dominic Casey did not have to be deposed, with the condition that he show the contracts to the judge stating he was indeed employed by the Anthony family and Jose Baez."
Here we go again! I'm not sure how long he has to provide the contracts, but I'm sure JB and company are drafting them as we speak. :deal:
Let's think about this-why would DC change his story? Are we finally getting to who he was on the phone with during the videotaped search in November? Not the psychic-that must have been adequately debunked by now.
What is he scared of that he would risk perjury, obstruction etc...
Zenaida Gonzalez's lawyers say they've exposed a major new lie in the case against Casey Anthony. (09/14/09)
http://www.wftv.com/video/20911069/index.html
whiteangora said:Ya know what? None of these people seem to be afraid of a perjury
charge coming down. George sat and lied his a$$ off about the Padillas being hired as his security team, and now DC figures he will get away with the lies too.
I'm wondering how much 'truth' we are going to hear at trial from the Anthony & Co. camp.
I should also add that it is very disappointing that Judge Rodriguez has not given Judge Strickland's findings enough weight here-If judge Strickland believes that DC had no privalege issues, and that nothing that he could say would be inflammatory to KC's case or should be sealed, then Judge Rodriguez should have taken that as a "green light."
Ya know what? None of these people seem to be afraid of a perjury
charge coming down. George sat and lied his a$$ off about the Padillas being hired as his security team, and now DC figures he will get away with the lies too.
I'm wondering how much 'truth' we are going to hear at trial from the Anthony & Co. camp.
Let's think about this-why would DC change his story? Are we finally getting to who he was on the phone with during the videotaped search in November? Not the psychic-that must have been adequately debunked by now.
What is he scared of that he would risk perjury, obstruction etc...
The problem here seems to be that the judge in the ZG case does not want to let any information come out in his courtroom that would bear directly against KC in her criminal trial. Whether or not DC's actions/words were privaleged, I think this judge will not make him answer.
A couple of times during the last hearing, the judge sustained objections by DC's attorney and clarified to her that it was not a work product issue to him, but a relevance issue-He then clarified that by "relevance" he means he does not want to breach that line into the criminal trial area (how that relates to "relevance," I do not know) JM tried to fight the judge on this, but he held his ground.
Yes, DC can get in trouble for perjury, as a seperate issue, but I do not believe Judge Rodriguez will then make him answer questions. If it is found that there was not confidentiality and DC was lying, JM will have to go back through the whole testimony from the last civil hearing to find every objection she made via work product, and see if he can get those answered-if DC's counsel objects again, I am afraid the judge will again sustain everything based on "relevance".
Not bragging or anything, but while the hearing was going on most here realized the discrepencies. It's a shame that Mitnick couldn't hear us yelling through our computer monitors!!Zenaida Gonzalez's lawyers say they've exposed a major new lie in the case against Casey Anthony. (09/14/09)
http://www.wftv.com/video/20911069/index.html
But, I think it is relevant to have DC answer questions about his conversations with his clients- George and Cindy. How does the judge know if the questions in the deposition are relevant if the deposition hasn't gone forward? It was my impression that the Judge here got stuck in "assumption" mode.The problem here seems to be that the judge in the ZG case does not want to let any information come out in his courtroom that would bear directly against KC in her criminal trial. Whether or not DC's actions/words were privaleged, I think this judge will not make him answer.
A couple of times during the last hearing, the judge sustained objections by DC's attorney and clarified to her that it was not a work product issue to him, but a relevance issue-He then clarified that by "relevance" he means he does not want to breach that line into the criminal trial area (how that relates to "relevance," I do not know) JM tried to fight the judge on this, but he held his ground.
Yes, DC can get in trouble for perjury, as a seperate issue, but I do not believe Judge Rodriguez will then make him answer questions. If it is found that there was not confidentiality and DC was lying, JM will have to go back through the whole testimony from the last civil hearing to find every objection she made via work product, and see if he can get those answered-if DC's counsel objects again, I am afraid the judge will again sustain everything based on "relevance".
Not bragging or anything, but while the hearing was going on most here realized the discrepencies. It's a shame that Mitnick couldn't here us yelling through our computer monitors!!
Ya know what? None of these people seem to be afraid of a perjury
charge coming down. George sat and lied his a$$ off about the Padillas being hired as his security team, and now DC figures he will get away with the lies too.
I'm wondering how much 'truth' we are going to hear at trial from the Anthony & Co. camp.
Ya know what? None of these people seem to be afraid of a perjury
charge coming down. George sat and lied his a$$ off about the Padillas being hired as his security team, and now DC figures he will get away with the lies too.
I'm wondering how much 'truth' we are going to hear at trial from the Anthony & Co. camp.
great post whiteangora about lies from this entire cast of characters. If he lied, then that could lead to uncovering untruths by George and Cindy. Hey, these liars are making Casey look truthful. :liar: