701 users online (91 members and 610 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 97 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1447
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    clifton park,ny
    Posts
    7,356

    OT-LKL,sat.Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald

    Did anyone see LKL last night? He was in a Maryland prison with Jeff MacDonald. MacDonald is trying once again to get his conviction thrown out. When you watch him you can easily be convinced that he is innocent. He claims it was all a conspiracy and evidence that would exonerate him was hidden. He and his defense are now going with DNA evidence.Of course he claims this is being held up for some reason.It would be something if he actually was innocent.
    On the other hand, I keep thinking of Scott and how similar these 2 are,a big conspiracy,no history of violence,the drug crazed hippies vs the satanic cult worshippers,the inlaws who believed in them until they caught them in lies. It is all frightenly similar!

  2. #2
    tthomanGuest
    Yes I caught about half of that....also, I read that book written a few years ago....(can't recall the title)...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,641
    I saw that show. It has been repeated several times over the past week or so. I was familiar with the story from the TV movie that came out many years ago in which he was made out to be very guilty. I must admit that in the LKL interview he was pretty convincing that he was innocent. He said that neighbors saw the hippies enter his home that night and that he would be freed on appeal if he could be granted one. Apparently, at one point, in an effort to appease the in-laws who were traumatized by the death of their daughter and granddaughters and that the killers were still free, Jeff told them that he had hunted them down and killed them. This was, of course, a lie and so when he was initially cleared and went on with his life, the in-laws learned of the lie and became suspicious of him. It was this lie -- he says -- that got him into trouble. I'd like to hear from the neighbors who saw the hippies.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    19,117
    Jeffrey MacDonald is absolutely, 100% guilty! I always think of him when people describe sociopaths who lie so convincingly because they have no conscience.

    But apparently it is also true that evidence was withheld at his trial and the government isn't in any hurry to run DNA tests that might appear to exonerate him.

    I, too, would like to hear what the neighbor says. There was a soldier at the time who said he saw a "hippy girl in a floppy hat" (MacDonald's description of one of the assailants) in the neighborhood - but that's a far cry from seeing a band of hippies enter MacDonald's house!

    There are some who believe MacDonald is guilty even IF there actually were some "hippies" at the house that night. No matter who was there, we are still left with babies and a housewife who were "overkilled" while a grown soldier (the trainer for the Army boxing team) was barely wounded during a "life-and-death" struggle with multiple assailants.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,687
    Give me a break. He is completely guilty. I have read this book also. There is no way hippies came into his house and killed his wife and kids and not him. Just like Darlie Router..we are supposed to believe all of these intruders came into their houses and killed innocent (I believe sleeping) children and left the parents alive.
    Just my opinion of course!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    119
    Thanks for the thread. Like many of you, I couldn't help but think of Scott Peterson. Like Peterson, MacDonald's expressions of emotion are contrived and transparent. I'm generally skeptical of people who claim they can tell whether someone is lying because the studies show that we're much more confident in this area than we are correct. Only about 5% of people can do consistently better than chance. However, I think different rules apply here, and in the Peterson case as well, because these men are psychopaths (I believe this -- I might be wrong) and don't experience the full spectrum of emotions, making them emotionally retarded in a sense. In the LKL interview, MacDonald became "upset" several times, and "recovered" instantly each time. This jumped out at me, because emotions don't work that way. Like honest facial expressions (except for surprise), emotions fade in and fade out. I thought MacDonald looked ridiculous -- one instant nearly sobbing -- one second later championing his cause. I don't know much about this case, but when they talked about him telling his wife's stepfather that he and a few buddies "took care of" one of the killers, I was reminded of Peterson again. Only someone who is emotionally blunted could believe that this would get the man to move on with his life. Just like Scott saying that Laci was okay with the affair or at peace with it or whatever. DUMB. Emotions matter. Without them, we can't reason very well, because we can't assign a proper value to different behaviors or potential consequences. MacDonald shows that you can be smart in an academic sense but remarkably stupid in the sophisticated world of social interaction -- especially if you're a psychopath. I've had difficulty learning much about the case. Anyone know the State's best evidence against him? What cannot be explained away?
    My opinions and deductions, hopefully based on reason and evidence.

    "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."
    Christopher Hitchens

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tempe, AZ
    Posts
    4,217
    I too believe Jeff MacDonald is guilty.
    I've read the book, seen the movie, and have heard his interviews several times.
    One part of the evidence was the superficial wound he received. And lied about the extent of it afterwards.
    There was also some evidence about ice pick stab marks that went through his pajama top. There was proof the marks were in a pattern as if the top was wrapped around his hand. The top was found on his wife's body.
    What strikes me as the most damaging are his own words of the account.
    He says while he was fighting off some of the "hippies" in the living room, his wife was screaming "Jeff, Jeff, why are they doing this to me."
    His daughters, he claims were yelling "Daddy!" "Daddy!"
    Imagine this: "Jeff, Jeff why are YOU doing this to me?"
    And would his daughters call only for him? I think they would be yelling for Mommy.(He was rarely home and they were closer to mom) I think they called "Daddy!" Because he was the one hacking away at them.
    My guess, he and his wife were in an argument. She slapped at him and he took that board and hit her. Killing her. One of the daughters entered the room saw what happened, and he had to kill both daughters.
    Then being a doctor, he sliced himself, knowing where it would do the least harm, and BINGO he had a story.
    The Hokey Pokey Clinic - A good place to turn yourself around:

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,766
    Natural Selection-
    Great post!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    53
    Have any of you read fatal justice?
    I hope you know, this will go down on your permanent record.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    555
    The piece of evidence that gets to me is his p.j. top and the way the stab marks (ice pick?) line up. Also, why are his wounds so minor compared to his wife and the girls. I think he's convinced himself that he didn't do it. I think he has a lot in common with Scott. I did read Fatal Vision. The author had to retract parts of the book because he "embellished" some of it, but reading between the lines told me that Jeff boy is one sick puppy!


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    53
    Not fatal vision.. fatal justice. Another book.

    DId you know that McDonald successfully sued the author of fatal vision because of lies in it and won?

    I use to be convinced of his guilt. I am not so sure anymore.
    I hope you know, this will go down on your permanent record.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    66
    I too, rondata, am on the fence about MacDonald since reading Fatal Justice. The author, of Fatal Vision, if I am correct, is not convinced of his guilt. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but I remember reading (I believe) after MacDonald sued him. Feel free to correct me on this, b/c I could be wrong.

    Did y'all remember that MacDonald's wife was also pregnant when murdered?

    Also, there was another murder (I had the book on this, but need to research who, what, when) that was very similar to these murders that also happened at Fort Bragg to an officer's wife and his children while he was away at a school for the military.
    IMO, IMHO, JMO, JMHO

  13. #13
    less0305's Avatar
    less0305 is offline The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember my name!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,243
    Well, I refuse to watch LKL anymore BUT..... I have always believed and will always believe that Jeffrey MacDonald savagely slaughtered his family. But did anyone see the show on Friday night (I can NOT remember which news magazine show it was) about the murder of the woman and her two children with the last name Feeney? The husband/father was a high school teacher and he was gone to a teaching seminar 100 miles away and his wife and two children are murdered. I believe that guy was guilty too and he was found not guilty......by a jury who believed he did it, but didn't convict him. Man, he got away with murder!!! I am really hoping that isn't the case with Scott Peterson.
    It's my own two cents. You don't have to read or like it.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,638
    I am not familiar with the case, but am frustrated that evidence was withheld in the trial, and that pertinent DNA tests are not being run.

    This man may have some really bad character flaws, but unless all pertinent evidence is examined it is unfair to convict him of the crime.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Davis, CA
    Posts
    461

    Blood Evidence Alone say's he's guilty

    Each person in the MacDonald Family had a different blood type. I don't think Jeffrey counted on that. His story and the blood evidence didn't jive. It's what convicts him in my book, and I believe what convicted him in court.

    I also was at Ft. Bragg shortly after that happened and talked to some of the MP/MI personnel involved. One of these personnel and I did a test on a table that was in Jeffrey MacDonald's house that was on it's side. (This table is extremely top heavy). We pushed, rolled, kicked.....and everytime the table landed with the top side down. This table was entered into evidence pictures on it's side. The only way the table could have ended up on it's side was if someone placed it that way.

    He's guilty alright.

    The similarities between him and Scott Peterson are incredible. Both are very good looking, compulsive liars, womanizers, had pregnant wives that were the epitome of womanhood.

    Another similarity is that his daughter had wet the bed and theory has it he just lost control. I always thought he lost control just as possibly Patsy Ramsey lost control with JonBenet.


    HM??????? ya think he's not guilty? Why?

    The house remained just as it was for years after this, but quite some time later they burned the entire inside and contents and then refurbished. I still got the chills when I drove past the housing project at Ft. Bragg.

Page 1 of 97 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast