Woman eats ex's goldfish after spat

spamelope · Sep 30, 2009

PASADENA, Texas - Authorities say a Houston-area woman who was burned up at her former common-law husband fried their pet goldfish and ate some of them. Pasadena police say it's a civil matter and no charges will be filed. The seven goldfish were purchased together by the couple during happier times.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33088053/ns/us_news-weird_news/

I'll bet PETA jumps all over this one!

Kymistry35 · Sep 30, 2009

That is just disgusting. I don't see why they can't file charges against her.

believe09 · Sep 30, 2009

He is well rid of her. How evil can you be....

spamelope · Sep 30, 2009

I think they could probably file charges against her if they wanted, because they were pets-not just community property. I'm sure PETA will apply pressure until she's charged with "animal" (fish?) cruelty. At least I hope they do.

mysticrose · Sep 30, 2009

Ewwww..that is gross ! I was just going to clean my aquarium when I saw this post...lol

spicedtea · Sep 30, 2009

That's just plain evil. To kill and eat something considered a pet to someone else as an act of revenge is sick. She's one crazy woman and need to be watched,hope they didn't have children.

kgeaux · Sep 30, 2009

spamelope said:
PASADENA, Texas - Authorities say a Houston-area woman who was burned up at her former common-law husband fried their pet goldfish and ate some of them. Pasadena police say it's a civil matter and no charges will be filed. The seven goldfish were purchased together by the couple during happier times.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33088053/ns/us_news-weird_news/

I'll bet PETA jumps all over this one!

Whoa. She is one sick puppy. I can't imagine how angry and off-the-wall crazy you'd have to be to eat a pet.

teonspaleprincess said:
That is just disgusting. I don't see why they can't file charges against her.

If the pets had been kittens or puppies, this woman would be up on all kinds of charges. I don't understand why they can't file charges, either. These were not fish in a stream to be caught and eaten, they were PETS.

PorcineGranny · Oct 14, 2009

I think they didn't charge her because in our society most fish are considered food. Another thing is that fish don't have vocal cords so they can't scream in pain although there is scientific proof now that fish do feel pain.

It was a vindictive act and he should count his blessings he is not with her. I don't understand people that think injuring or killing someone's pets or children is a way to retaliate for what they perceive as a wrongdoing. These people are idiots.

Woman eats ex's goldfish after spat

New Posts

spamelope

Active Member

Kymistry35

It's never to late to be who you could have been

believe09

Well-Known Member

spamelope

Active Member

mysticrose

The key to change... is to let go of fear

spicedtea

Member

kgeaux

Active Member

PorcineGranny

crabby old lady!

DNASolves

Members online

Online statistics

Forum statistics