925 users online (167 members and 758 guests)  


Websleuths News

View Poll Results: Did you read page 81-85 of Olsson's book on the RN?

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
  • yes

    1 50.00%
  • no

    1 50.00%

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015

    Testing RDI spin theory that PR and JR wrote the RN

    "listen carefully"

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVbEnZgNn1I&feature=PlayList&p=E0C1812906D 706F9&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=19"]YouTube - The work of the forensic linguist[/ame]

    [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acHg0L5ky30"]YouTube - Solved- Wife's Murder[/nomedia]

    I must admit, my trust in the RDI spin team has been shaken.

    Remember back to your first teachings, all who gain power are afraid to lose, even the RDI spin team. Good is a point of view. The RDIST and the JIDI are alike in almost every respect, including their quest for greater justice.

    Did you ever hear of John Olsson? I thought not. It's not a story the RDI spin team would tell you. He's a JIDI legend. John Olsson is a dark lord so wise and so powerful, he could even demonstrate whether PR and JR wrote the RN together. He has such a knowledge of forensic linguistics even could even save the ones he cared for from RDI spin. Dark side of the forensic linguistics is pathway to many interpretations some would consider to be unnatural. Would it be possible to learn this power? Not from an RDI spin team.

    One RDI spin theory is that the note consists of dual authors, such as JR dictating to PR or PR and JR working on the RN together.

    http://www.thetext.co.uk/john_olsson.html

    John Olsson "John Olsson has published in the Forensic Linguistics peer reviewed professional journal, is the author of a well-known university textbook, Forensic Linguistics (subtitled An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law), now in its second edition."


    "Olsson's forensic analysis has been submitted for evidence before the U.S. Supreme Court and a U.S. District Court. In addition, he has been admitted as an expert in an Australian Federal Court in connection with copyright infringement and has written a number of reports in connection with copyright and trademark infringement."

    http://books.google.com/books?id=i33...age&q=&f=false

    scroll to page 81-85, based on localized distribution, he rejects the null hypothesis of dual authors.









    Last edited by voynich; 10-01-2009 at 11:44 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,970
    Trust me,you don't want us to start talking about the SPIN in this case.
    What's your point anyway.Did these guys come public to state that PR DIDN'T write the note?Did they come public and state WHO DID?Having an OPINION is easy.I'll wait until the IDI theory is officially backed up by these experts.(I'll die waiting)



    Until there's a DNA match (I'll die waiting) ,until there's an arrest (I'll die waiting) and until they got another suspect (I'll die waiting) whose handwriting they can analyse.....................until then.....you're free to SPIN it my friend.Why do you need 100 threads on the same subject anyway,it's getting messy.
    Last edited by madeleine; 10-01-2009 at 09:07 AM.
    The rice is already cooked...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,019
    You do realise, Voynich, that you are making a rod for your own back with this focus on one aspect of the ransom note (as opposed to the graphology, location of letter etc)? It'll come and bite you on the bum one day.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Sophie View Post
    You do realise, Voynich, that you are making a rod for your own back with this focus on one aspect of the ransom note (as opposed to the graphology, location of letter etc)? It'll come and bite you on the bum one day.
    I have in the past addressed other topics feel free to consult it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    1,040
    Now you bring people that wrote books that JR or PR couldn't had wrote the RN and even wrote this in books but yet we have Tom Miller that the R's dream team set out to ruin this man and then Don Foster that the DA tried to ruin so why should we believe these you bring up cause actually did they have all the evidence the LE had before they made the decision....
    Knowledge of time is precious.Wisdom of truth is more precious than time..Opinions I write are mine..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,221
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    VICTORY!
    I wouldn't celebrate just yet. I read the pages. My biggest problem is that he seems to assume that whole "we-I" deal was on the square.

    I see you have constructed a new lightsaber.
    And I know how to use it.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,221
    Quote Originally Posted by madeleine View Post
    Trust me,you don't want us to start talking about the SPIN in this case.
    Yeah, he REALLY doesn't. I tried to explain to him that RDI doesn't HAVE a spin team and that we're the ones trying to cut through the spin. Seems to have fallen on deaf ears. Maybe if I applied a Force-choke, his ears would open up! It tends to have that effect on people!

    Having an OPINION is easy.
    Especially when it's so easy to just repeat what someone else says.

    I'll wait until the IDI theory is officially backed up by these experts.(I'll die waiting)
    I'm not holding my breath, either. (Though that's kind of hard to do with this mask!)

    Why do you need 100 threads on the same subject anyway,it's getting messy.
    No consideration for efficiency.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravyn View Post
    Now you bring people that wrote books that JR or PR couldn't had wrote the RN and even wrote this in books but yet we have Tom Miller that the R's dream team set out to ruin this man and then Don Foster that the DA tried to ruin
    IDI's not too keen to touch those particular subjects, I notice.

    so why should we believe these you bring up cause actually did they have all the evidence the LE had before they made the decision....
    I would doubt it.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    . Seems to have fallen on deaf ears. Maybe if I applied a Force-choke, his ears would open up! It tends to have that effect on people!
    .
    LMAO! The last words you hear

    "apology accepted captain dave" to the sound of a mechanical respirator



    popper falsification

    [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability[/ame]
    Falsifiability Falsifiability

    Falsifiability (or refutability) is the logical possibility that an assertion can be shown false by an observation or a physical experiment. That something is "falsifiable" does not mean it is false; rather, that if it is false, then this can be shown by observation or experiment. Falsifiability is an important concept in science and the philosophy of science. The term "testability" is related but more specific; it means that an assertion can be falsified through experimentation alone.

    For example, "all men are mortal" is unfalsifiable, since no finite amount of observation could ever demonstrate its falsehood: that one or more men can live forever. "All men are immortal," by contrast, is falsifiable, by the presentation of just one dead man. Not all statements that are falsifiable in principle are falsifiable in practice. For example, "it will be raining here in one million years" is theoretically falsifiable, but not practical.

    Popper stressed that unfalsifiable statements are still very important for science and are often contained in scientific theories as unfalsifiable consequences. For example, while "all men are mortal" is unfalsifiable, it is still contained as a consequence of the falsifiable theory that "every man dies before he reaches the age of 150 years". Similarly, the ancient metaphysical idea of the existence of atoms has led to corresponding falsifiable modern theories. Popper invented the notion of metaphysical research programs to name such ideas.

    In contrast to Positivism, which held that statements are senseless if they cannot be verified or falsified, Popper denied that falsifiability somehow makes scientific theories special. According to Popper, falsifiability is merely a special case of the much more general notion of criticizability, even though he admitted that falsification is one of the most effective methods by which theories can be criticized.

    Use in courts of law

    Falsifiability was one of the criteria used by Judge William Overton in the McLean v. Arkansas ruling to determine that 'creation science' was not scientific and should not be taught in Arkansas public schools. In his conclusion related to this criterion he stated that "While anybody is free to approach a scientific inquiry in any fashion they choose, they cannot properly describe the methodology as scientific, if they start with the conclusion and refuse to change it regardless of the evidence developed during the course of the investigation."[2]

    It was also enshrined in United States law as part of the Daubert Standard set by the Supreme Court for whether scientific evidence is admissible in a jury trial.


    VICTORY!

    While RDI spin team could revise their spin, Forensic linguistics, weapon of the JIDI knight. I see you have constructed a new lightsaber.
    Last edited by voynich; 10-01-2009 at 11:42 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,221
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    LMAO! The last words you hear

    "apology accepted captain dave" to the sound of a mechanical respirator
    Got your attention, didn't it?
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Got your attention, didn't it?
    SW and forcespeak always do


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,221
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    SW and forcespeak always do

    I know. I just hope you appreciate the message I was trying to convey.
    I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    college campus
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    I know. I just hope you appreciate the message I was trying to convey.
    Dave search your feelings, you know, don't you?

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGBFasDG31I"]YouTube - Anakin and Palpatine at the Opera[/ame]

    RDI spin team want to spin this investigation. They are planning to spin scientific evidence
    JIDI use scientific evidence for justice.

    The Dark Side of the Forensic linguistics is a pathway to many conclusions the RDI spin team would consider to be unnatural.

    Would it be possible to learn this power?

    Not from a RDI spin team.
    Last edited by voynich; 10-02-2009 at 12:51 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,299
    Quote Originally Posted by voynich View Post
    "listen carefully"

    YouTube - The work of the forensic linguist

    YouTube - Solved- Wife's Murder

    I must admit, my trust in the RDI spin team has been shaken.

    Remember back to your first teachings, all who gain power are afraid to lose, even the RDI spin team. Good is a point of view. The RDIST and the JIDI are alike in almost every respect, including their quest for greater justice.

    Did you ever hear of John Olsson? I thought not. It's not a story the RDI spin team would tell you. He's a JIDI legend. John Olsson is a dark lord so wise and so powerful, he could even demonstrate whether PR and JR wrote the RN together. He has such a knowledge of forensic linguistics even could even save the ones he cared for from RDI spin. Dark side of the forensic linguistics is pathway to many interpretations some would consider to be unnatural. Would it be possible to learn this power? Not from an RDI spin team.

    One RDI spin theory is that the note consists of dual authors, such as JR dictating to PR or PR and JR working on the RN together.

    http://www.thetext.co.uk/john_olsson.html

    John Olsson "John Olsson has published in the Forensic Linguistics peer reviewed professional journal, is the author of a well-known university textbook, Forensic Linguistics (subtitled An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law), now in its second edition."


    "Olsson's forensic analysis has been submitted for evidence before the U.S. Supreme Court and a U.S. District Court. In addition, he has been admitted as an expert in an Australian Federal Court in connection with copyright infringement and has written a number of reports in connection with copyright and trademark infringement."

    http://books.google.com/books?id=i33...age&q=&f=false

    scroll to page 81-85, based on localized distribution, he rejects the null hypothesis of dual authors.









    IMO the 'she dies' repetition is an attempt by the RN author to employ style and rhythm in a composition. The RN was, after all, a composition more than it was a ransom note. Who knows, voinich maybe someday we'll find something under a linguistic stone. Keep up the good work.
    Last edited by Holdontoyourhat; 10-02-2009 at 08:54 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    1,040
    Ok so this just says one author I can take that but now can you show the pages where he ruled out the Ramsey's cause we have alot said PR wrote it...And I'm sure it would be safe to say that anyone wouldn't want to face the Dream team cause who would be crazy enough to set themselves up to be ruined....But yet still they didn't have all the LE had we they came up with their decisions but yet write books about it...
    Knowledge of time is precious.Wisdom of truth is more precious than time..Opinions I write are mine..

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Chaos Theory-A Unified Theory of Muppet Types
    By Jacie Estes in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2012, 12:21 PM
  2. What OJ wrote
    By aingael in forum Missing Archives
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-14-2007, 08:58 PM
  3. Theory - Karr Did It, Pasty Wrote The Note ...
    By Woodsman in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-27-2006, 10:50 AM
  4. CA-who wrote this doenetwork description?
    By KatherineQ in forum Missing Archives
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-15-2006, 12:39 AM