1221 users online (254 members and 967 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,001

    George's comments to Detective Amege on 8/5/08

    I've been spending some time on a document released on 07/30 that I've not had time to read through. It's this one full of tips:

    http://www.wftv.com/pdf/20226973/detail.html

    On page 49 and 50 of that pdf is a tip from a Luke Phillips who called Detective Eric Amege of OCSO. He stated in a voicemail that he knew where Caylee was and that she was being held by two armed persons.

    Then George Anthony call Detective Amege and that's where things really become surreal.

    1. George called Amege because he had his business card from a previous contact several months before (this is in August). What previous contact??? What happened several months before that required an OCSO detective to be involved?

    2. George verifies Dominic Casey is not working for the Anthony family at that time.

    3. And here's the mindblower: George Anthony was aware of the given location of Caylee as provided by Luke Phillips but was unsure if he would give that info to OCSO.

    WTF??? GA was NOT going to give a location that he thought his granddaughter might be being held by armed people?

    OMG....I'm speechless.
    Last edited by Valhall; 10-04-2009 at 12:03 PM. Reason: typo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    It could be read that GA was unsure if he (luke Phillips) would give that info to OCSO.
    Just another thought after a quick read.

    ETA: okay afer re reading i do not think that the "he" is GA.
    Last edited by JBean; 10-04-2009 at 12:16 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    also here is the calls to service summary where he could have had previous contact:

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...highlight=OCSO

    ETA: don't know if there was anything current.
    Last edited by JBean; 10-04-2009 at 12:18 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by JBean View Post
    It could be read that GA was unsure if he (luke Phillips) would give that info to OCSO.
    Just another thought after a quick read.
    I do agree it COULD be, but it outright states George Anthony is aware of the given location as provided by Phillips. With that said, it doesn't matter if the last part of the sentence refers to Phillips or George. George apparently didn't give it over.

    Is this about the same time GA started his crap about having a location under surveillance where they thought Caylee was being held?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by JBean View Post
    also here is the calls to service summary where he could have had previous contact:

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...highlight=OCSO

    ETA: don't know if there was anything current.
    Thank you for this link, but do you have any advice on how to locate the calls to their address? Is there a particular place to navigate to?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Valhall View Post
    I do agree it COULD be, but it outright states George Anthony is aware of the given location as provided by Phillips. With that said, it doesn't matter if the last part of the sentence refers to Phillips or George. George apparently didn't give it over.

    Is this about the same time GA started his crap about having a location under surveillance where they thought Caylee was being held?
    Give them the location where the 2 men were holding her hostage?
    It could be read that GA was calling to make sure they followed up on this lead.

    ETA: it would be kind of odd to call and say I know something you don't know and I am not going to tell you. why would he call at all?
    I think this is just worded poorly jmho of course.
    Last edited by JBean; 10-04-2009 at 12:24 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Valhall View Post
    Thank you for this link, but do you have any advice on how to locate the calls to their address? Is there a particular place to navigate to?
    the calls are in the thread.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    481
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2685248&postcount=31"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Official Documents-Audio-Arrest Updates No Discussion[/ame]


    From Official Documents thread.
    "We wish to find the truth, no matter where it lies. But to find the truth we need imagination and skepticism both. We will not be afraid to speculate, but we will be careful to distinguish speculation from fact." Carl Sagan

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Thanks, guys. I'm guess 2 years could be referred to as several months back. That would be the closest call (June 2006 stolen vehicle) to the time of the tip.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by Valhall View Post
    Thanks, guys. I'm guess 2 years could be referred to as several months back. That would be the closest call (June 2006 stolen vehicle) to the time of the tip.
    Could it be that the contact happened during one of GA's security jobs? Maybe he had to report some sort of criminal activity at one of the locations he was assigned to??
    "We wish to find the truth, no matter where it lies. But to find the truth we need imagination and skepticism both. We will not be afraid to speculate, but we will be careful to distinguish speculation from fact." Carl Sagan


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by ClockWatcher View Post
    Could it be that the contact happened during one of GA's security jobs? Maybe he had to report some sort of criminal activity at one of the locations he was assigned to??
    That could very well be. And, even seems very plausible. The 2 years is stretching it for "several months" to work. I'm leaning toward your suggestion.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Valhall View Post
    Thanks, guys. I'm guess 2 years could be referred to as several months back. That would be the closest call (June 2006 stolen vehicle) to the time of the tip.
    could be the gas cans of 6/24/08, while it was only a month and a half maybe he thought it was a several months.
    Last edited by JBean; 10-04-2009 at 01:03 PM. Reason: changed couple months to several as per the stmt

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    I also noticed that while the detetive staes that LP knew the location of the 2 suspects holding Caylee hostage, the detective does not reveal it in the statement. the same could be true for his report of his vm from GA. IOW, gA said he knew of the location but wasn't sure if LP was turning it over to the OCSO and perhaps GA names it on the vm but the detective didn;t reveal it there either. Not sure , but again, seems poorly worded or I need mas cafe'

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by JBean View Post
    I also noticed that while the detetive staes that LP knew the location of the 2 suspects holding Caylee hostage, the detective does not reveal it in the statement. the same could be true for his report of his vm from GA. IOW, gA said he knew of the location but wasn't sure if LP was turning it over to the OCSO and perhaps GA names it on the vm but the detective didn;t reveal it there either. Not sure , but again, seems poorly worded or I need mas cafe'
    I think you're right. I think it's just terribly worded. Because if you read like it's written, it doesn't make GA look to good. But at that time, GA was being cooperative, so I can't see him saying "I'm not telling you." Now...a few months down the road, yeah, but not at the first of August.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,088
    None of it makes any sense to me. It can't be a coincidence that Luke and George just happen to call the same Orlando PD detective. So either George told Luke to call Det. Amege or Luke told George that was who he talked to. Why would George say that about having his card from months ago unless he told Luke to call him. Why wouldn't he call OCSO instead of Orlando PD. I'm confused. Going back to read it again for like the fifth time.



Similar Threads

  1. George and Cindy Anthony’s Body Language and Comments Indicates They Are Feigning
    By The World According in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 280
    Last Post: 12-28-2010, 12:05 AM
  2. Lip Reading Analysis: George's Silent Comments at 11/25/08 Hearing
    By NJ Lawyer in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-29-2008, 07:40 PM
  3. Theory #2: Family Abduction by George Waters with George Brody and/or Associates
    By Dr. Doogie in forum Anna Christian Waters Discussion Threads
    Replies: 866
    Last Post: 09-21-2008, 08:05 PM
  4. MySpace Links/Comments & Facebook comments
    By SeriouslySearching in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 706
    Last Post: 09-14-2008, 05:11 PM