Page 16 of 61 FirstFirst ... 6 14 15 16 17 18 26 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 240 of 909
  1. #226
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    16,835
    Quote Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
    In the most general terms the average American tends to believe that people are truthful. Look at KC's friends given her history. They were aware she told some lies but not were not aware that she was a thief. History of stealing from the family proves that. Friends might miss something and think they lost it and they may have. We will never know.

    The fact that people do trust others, unless they suspect foul play is involved, there is every reason to believe that anyone picked for a jury will trust the experts to provide them with the information they need to come to a conclusion. That would be from both sides.

    The fact that money would be involved, for some, would set off their "hinky meter". The duct tape is an uphill battle for defense because it clearly is what it is. There is no tissue, no blood for defense to disagree with. There is a picture of the skull with the duct tape on it. No one will need an expert to explain the picture. jmo
    That deserves an AMEN!!!
    Unless I provide a link, ever one of my posts are to be considered rumor, Speculation, or simply MY OWN OPINION.


  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Tulessa For This Useful Post:


  3. #227
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,543
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteangora View Post
    snipped and bbm
    I find it intriguing that "you are sure the defense did".
    May I ask where this certainty is coming from?
    Common sense. IMO


  4. #228
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,543
    I would like to make note that page 9637 of the docs states that q66 (duct tape on red gas can) is 2 1/2 inches long, however on page 9649 it states that q66 is 2.75 inches long. I am wondering if they are getting these q numbers mixed up, but a quarter of an inch is a big difference. It should also be noted on page 3220 they take the red metal gas can into evidence on Aug 1st and return it on Aug 13th, however no mention of any duct tape. They also state that they take 8 pictures. I know there is only one grainy black and white floating around. That being said, I believe that the q66 duct tape that they are comparing to was put on the gas can after Kc was in jail. IMO

    http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21252257/detail.html

    http://www.wftv.com/news/18530350/detail.html


  5. #229
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,231
    Quote Originally Posted by notthatsmart View Post
    I would like to make note that page 9637 of the docs states that q66 (duct tape on red gas can) is 2 1/2 inches long, however on page 9649 it states that q66 is 2.75 inches long. I am wondering if they are getting these q numbers mixed up, but a quarter of an inch is a big difference. It should also be noted on page 3220 they take the red metal gas can into evidence on Aug 1st and return it on Aug 13th, however no mention of any duct tape. They also state that they take 8 pictures. I know there is only one grainy black and white floating around. That being said, I believe that the q66 duct tape that they are comparing to was put on the gas can after Kc was in jail. IMO

    http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21252257/detail.html

    http://www.wftv.com/news/18530350/detail.html
    Hmmm. I don't believe the statement that I bolded. But am interested in who you think might have done that and why.
    The heart of the pure can see, but my eyes have never seen the unicorn . . .


  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ExpectingUnicorns For This Useful Post:


  7. #230
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,162
    Quote Originally Posted by notthatsmart View Post
    Common sense. IMO
    Thank you NTS. And that is exactly what the jury will use to determine that the duct tape on the can, posters of Caylee and at the remains site are all from the A's home. It makes more sense that they were all from the same or similiar roll from the household than to over complicate it with "what ifs" given the fact that this is not one single piece of evidence alone pointing to KC. Very damning and points right in the direction of KC without any other person who would have had the opportunity, motive and most of all physical custody of the child at the time. It's not complicated so why try to make it so. Juries are into common sense not some type of speculative theory. They like things in neat little packages that make sense. It is proven right here on this forum. jmo



  8. #231
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    507
    I think it would be great for the prosecutor to have matching duct tape but in looking at all the evidence as a whole I think as a juror I would not need that to think she wrapped Caylee in it. So if you took that matching duct tape out of the equation and reviewed all the other evidence it would not change my mind about what happened and who I felt was responsible. There is no smoking gun but obvioulsy the grand jury did not need one to press charges as the body was not even discovered yet. MOO


  9. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to nort For This Useful Post:


  10. #232
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,162
    And in the end the jury will only consider what is believable regarding the duct tape. The fact that it was taped in such a way on the child's mouth to obstruct the nose and mouth is what they will see. If you did that to a live child, the child would die. That is what they will see and that is what will be in their heads. Not a pretty site and hard for defense to argue that what you are seeing means nothing. jmo


  11. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:


  12. #233
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,719
    Quote Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
    Thank you NTS. And that is exactly what the jury will use to determine that the duct tape on the can, posters of Caylee and at the remains site are all from the A's home. It makes more sense that they were all from the same or similiar roll from the household than to over complicate it with "what ifs" given the fact that this is not one single piece of evidence alone pointing to KC. Very damning and points right in the direction of KC without any other person who would have had the opportunity, motive and most of all physical custody of the child at the time. It's not complicated so why try to make it so. Juries are into common sense not some type of speculative theory. They like things in neat little packages that make sense. It is proven right here on this forum. jmo
    Lambchop YOU ROCK!!!!! The thanks button just wasn't enough! ITA! You said exactly what I've been thinking, only better than I could have put it in words!

    And might I add that the defense has been fighting common sense for dollar signs since this case started. If they had used common sense at all, we wouldn't be where we are NOW. The only ones using common sense has been LE and SA, and that will be shown clearly at trial.
    Last edited by Aedrys; 04-25-2010 at 12:42 PM.


  13. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Aedrys For This Useful Post:


  14. #234
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by notthatsmart View Post
    Common sense. IMO
    But not a fact then? Just an opinion?


  15. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to logicalgirl For This Useful Post:


  16. #235
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by notthatsmart View Post
    Common sense. IMO
    I don't think that "common sense" can be taken as a given from this defense team, since it does not seem to be to something they always practice.


  17. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to mountaintime For This Useful Post:


  18. #236
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,465
    Quote Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
    And in the end the jury will only consider what is believable regarding the duct tape. The fact that it was taped in such a way on the child's mouth to obstruct the nose and mouth is what they will see. If you did that to a live child, the child would die. That is what they will see and that is what will be in their heads. Not a pretty site and hard for defense to argue that what you are seeing means nothing. jmo

    Lambchop most excellent post! ITA when it comes to the jury and common sense, and believability. When I review the case etc. I try to view it as if I am a prospective juror as I've been in the past and it really helps to define things as well as eliminate alot of frustration in regards speculation vs. to coming to a rational conclusion with a solid explanation. In the end it will be how the SA lays the case out before the jury. It's like you said, they do like things in neat, tidy little packages!
    Last edited by Anais; 04-25-2010 at 02:39 PM.


  19. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Anais For This Useful Post:


  20. #237
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,162
    Quote Originally Posted by nort View Post
    I think it would be great for the prosecutor to have matching duct tape but in looking at all the evidence as a whole I think as a juror I would not need that to think she wrapped Caylee in it. So if you took that matching duct tape out of the equation and reviewed all the other evidence it would not change my mind about what happened and who I felt was responsible. There is no smoking gun but obvioulsy the grand jury did not need one to press charges as the body was not even discovered yet. MOO
    This is very true. And if there was just the duct tape with the remains that was similiar to duct tape from the house it could be a stretch. But there was more. There was the blanket which CA admits was missing so this is a little bit less of a stretch now but could be explained away very easily, true. And then we have the laundry basket (which is the same make, different model than the one in the home but this too has been reported as missing). Now there is a problem with defense because now there are at least two other items we know came from the home and that makes the duct tape more likely than not to have come from the A's household.

    We all know Henkel tape was found in the A's household. We all know that cotton under certain conditions degrades rapidly. Common sense tells us it's not a stretch to believe the duct tape on Caylee's face came from the A's household given the fact that other missing items from the home were also found at the scene. Put this all together with a mother who has lied to LE about the whereabouts of her child and it sounds like a pretty tight package to me.

    jmo


  21. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:


  22. #238
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,721
    Quote Originally Posted by lambchop
    This is very true. And if there was just the duct tape with the remains that was similiar to duct tape from the house it could be a stretch. But there was more. There was the blanket which CA admits was missing so this is a little bit less of a stretch now but could be explained away very easily, true. And then we have the laundry basket (which is the same make, different model than the one in the home but this too has been reported as missing). Now there is a problem with defense because now there are at least two other items we know came from the home and that makes the duct tape more likely than not to have come from the A's household.

    We all know Henkel tape was found in the A's household. We all know that cotton under certain conditions degrades rapidly. Common sense tells us it's not a stretch to believe the duct tape on Caylee's face came from the A's household given the fact that other missing items from the home were also found at the scene. Put this all together with a mother who has lied to LE about the whereabouts of her child and it sounds like a pretty tight package to me.

    Yes, LC...too much evidence that connects to Inmate Anthony...

    Understand, this is why CA talking to Inmate Anthony about someone having a "key" to their home..remember during one jailhouse visit, CA asks Inmate Anthony if anyone has been in her home, Inmate Anthony responds, ma, I told you she had a key...still we will hear of this invisible person who had a key to the Anthony home...far stretch but they will try to use this with this UNK stray hair to their advantage but IMO, it won't fly...too much overwhelming evidence that points to Inmate Anthony. I do hope whoever sits on this jury does use common sense to put the totality of evidence and not just one piece...JMHO

    Justice for Caylee


  23. #239
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,162
    Quote Originally Posted by LiveLaughLuv View Post
    Yes, LC...too much evidence that connects to Inmate Anthony...

    Understand, this is why CA talking to Inmate Anthony about someone having a "key" to their home..remember during one jailhouse visit, CA asks Inmate Anthony if anyone has been in her home, Inmate Anthony responds, ma, I told you she had a key...still we will hear of this invisible person who had a key to the Anthony home...far stretch but they will try to use this with this UNK stray hair to their advantage but IMO, it won't fly...too much overwhelming evidence that points to Inmate Anthony. I do hope whoever sits on this jury does use common sense to put the totality of evidence and not just one piece...JMHO

    Justice for Caylee
    Kind of makes your "hinkymeter" go off, too, when we think about GA befriending RC. Was he planning on setting her up by giving her a key? It sounds way out there but was does not with this case?????


  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:


  25. #240
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,465
    Quote Originally Posted by LiveLaughLuv View Post
    Yes, LC...too much evidence that connects to Inmate Anthony...

    Understand, this is why CA talking to Inmate Anthony about someone having a "key" to their home..remember during one jailhouse visit, CA asks Inmate Anthony if anyone has been in her home, Inmate Anthony responds, ma, I told you she had a key...still we will hear of this invisible person who had a key to the Anthony home...far stretch but they will try to use this with this UNK stray hair to their advantage but IMO, it won't fly...too much overwhelming evidence that points to Inmate Anthony. I do hope whoever sits on this jury does use common sense to put the totality of evidence and not just one piece...JMHO

    Justice for Caylee
    I have to say that it would be detrimental to the defense to attempt such an explanation IMO. The invisinanny will never, ever fly. Let's be realistic is CA and GA, LA all going to get on the stand and commit perjury in regards to the invisinanny. If I were a juror I would see straight through the farce of jailhouse vidoes and how CA and Casey are so cunning and manipulative. Rather they attempt to be.


  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Anais For This Useful Post:


Page 16 of 61 FirstFirst ... 6 14 15 16 17 18 26 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 992
    Last Post: 05-08-2012, 06:00 PM
  2. The Single Piece of Henkel Duct Tape Found NOT on Remains
    By magic-cat in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: 06-11-2011, 10:37 PM
  3. The Duct Tape
    By Sophie in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 02-04-2010, 04:09 AM
  4. Duct tape???
    By Toltec in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-23-2007, 11:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •