CA CA - Knapps, Male 397UMCA, 35-60, @ Old Blue Creek Lodge, July'00

Danaya

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
1,083
Reaction score
913
Unidentified Male


The victim was discovered in July 2000 in Humboldt County, California.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vital Statistics


Estimated age: 35 - 60 years old
Approximate Height and Weight: 5'7" - 5'10";
Dentals: Dental records available.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case History
The victim was located in an area known as Knapps, about 15 miles up the Klamath River. The area is also known as the Old Blue Creek Lodge site.


Case 397UMCA on doe network.
http://doenetwork.org/cases/397umca.html

Possible Match:
Gregory Wilson Reynolds
 
Unidentified Male


The victim was discovered in July 2000 in Humboldt County, California.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vital Statistics


Estimated age: 35 - 60 years old
Approximate Height and Weight: 5'7" - 5'10";
Dentals: Dental records available.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case History
The victim was located in an area known as Knapps, about 15 miles up the Klamath River. The area is also known as the Old Blue Creek Lodge site.


Case 397UMCA on doe network.
http://doenetwork.org/cases/397umca.html

Possible Match:
Gregory Wilson Reynolds
--------------------------------------------------------

There are similarities.
The reconstruction on Doe Network looks like he has a thicker face, nose. But it is a reconstruction.

It is about 400 miles from Monterey area to Eureka, CA.(Humboldt Cty)
And if driving on the coast road, it will take 7 hours or so.
 
So do you think then because its 7 hours away its not a good match? That was what I was thinking, how would he get there...
 
So do you think then because its 7 hours away its not a good match? That was what I was thinking, how would he get there...

He could have been hitch hiking and got picked up by the wrong person.
 
My thinking is: Submit this. You won't know til you try and it is a good enough match. Let's hope he is found.
 
It seems entirely natural to start out near Big Sur (he was traveling if he was at a campground) and then head north up Highway 1 or 101. It's only a "missing from" location - he could have had his own means of transport even if he wasn't hiking and still gotten into trouble. The big "problem" with a match is that there is not much data to rule out/filter and the fact that these two are both within the same state and therefore should have been placed on the same databases already, with DNA available. So it should be an easy rule out - which means it should have been done. Of course it can't hurt to check.
 
Bump

Doe link in OP is still active. I couldn't find any likely matches.
 
Height estimate broadened to 5'6" - 6'1" and Namus says the remains were recently deposited by falling river levels - so may not be local.

397UMCA
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

There were recons uploaded in 2018 to Namus: It is unknown if he had facial or head hair.
Thumbnail

Thumbnail

Thumbnail

There are also images of the footwear and other items in Namus
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
90
Guests online
1,318
Total visitors
1,408

Forum statistics

Threads
591,791
Messages
17,958,928
Members
228,607
Latest member
wdavewong
Back
Top