Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: CA - San Francisco - WhtFem 353UFCA, ~30, Golden Gate Bridge Jumper, Apr'91

  1. #1
    kpdx's Avatar
    kpdx is offline Jane Doe was discovered Aug. 14, 1977 outside of Everett WA
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    PDX, OR
    Posts
    450

    Question CA - San Francisco - WhtFem 353UFCA, ~30, Golden Gate Bridge Jumper, Apr'91

    http://doenetwork.org/cases/353ufca.html

    http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/882dfca.html

    Composite and photo look really similar, all demos match up, and Lillian seemed to have a similar fashion sense...and was an endangered runaway.

    What do you think?
    Last edited by CarlK90245; 03-08-2013 at 03:45 AM.
    'Nothing clears up a case so much as stating it to another person.'

    Sherlock Holmes

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kpdx For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    313
    I think it looks like a good match besides the age difference, which could be off.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,438
    The looks are very similar, but Lillian would have only been 18 in 1991, that's a far cry from 30. Could they be that far off in age? I don't know?

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    104
    I think it looks like a good match too. I've seen cases where the age was further off than that so I wouldn't worry too much about the age difference.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Cereal City & K-zoo
    Posts
    1,026
    Can't hurt to submit it. I wonder what the circumstances are around Jane Doe? How do they know she jumped off the G.G. bridge? Was there a witness? I wish there was more information.
    If Lillian doesn't match, I found this woman and thought maybe her husband or someone associated with him had something to do with seeing our JD jump off the bridge? http://charleyproject.org/cases/r/racz_ann.html
    Last edited by Tizzle; 11-22-2009 at 02:24 PM. Reason: funkiness

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    902
    The estimated age is 30 Lillian would have only been like 17.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    902
    Quote Originally Posted by Tizzle View Post
    Can't hurt to submit it. I wonder what the circumstances are around Jane Doe? How do they know she jumped off the G.G. bridge? Was there a witness? I wish there was more information.
    If Lillian doesn't match, I found this woman and thought maybe her husband or someone associated with him had something to do with seeing our JD jump off the bridge? http://charleyproject.org/cases/r/racz_ann.html
    No, I don't think so. The UID had no scars or tattoos, this womn had a long scar all the way from her navel to her pelvic are. Also, I think the age is too far off and don't see her dressing like that. Unfortunately I think the women was a victim of foul play.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Cereal City & K-zoo
    Posts
    1,026
    Last week an UID was found in SC. The estimated age was 13-20. Turns out she was actually a 30 y.o. woman. I'm just saying, estimated ages aren't always right on.

    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=91653"]SC- Unidentified female body found 11/15 - age 13-20 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tizzle For This Useful Post:


  11. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,438
    Quote Originally Posted by Tizzle View Post
    Last week an UID was found in SC. The estimated age was 13-20. Turns out she was actually a 30 y.o. woman. I'm just saying, estimated ages aren't always right on.

    SC- Unidentified female body found 11/15 - age 13-20 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
    If they can be that far off, then I'd say submit her, it all looks right otherwise, so why not?

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Billylee For This Useful Post:


  13. #10
    MadeaBecBec's Avatar
    MadeaBecBec is offline "The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it."
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Where Life is Grand, C-Dubya,AR
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by kpdx View Post
    http://doenetwork.org/cases/353ufca.html

    http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/882dfca.html

    Composite and photo look really similar, all demos match up, and Lillian seemed to have a similar fashion sense...and was an endangered runaway.

    What do you think?
    In my opinion, Lillian Estrada looks eerily similar and before i saw her date of birth, I thought she looked at least 25 years in that photo. That could be the case with this Jane, she appears to be older. Sometimes the dentals don't give a true age!
    Here is a side by side of Lillian and this UID, for comparison
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Never forget the three powerful resources you always have available to you: love, prayer, and forgiveness. H. Jackson Brown, Jr.

  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to MadeaBecBec For This Useful Post:


  15. #11
    They should be able to tell the approximate age from the degree of fusion in the bones in the skull. At least well enough to tell the difference between a 17 year old and a 30 year old anyway.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Natal For This Useful Post:


  17. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    164
    Looks good! I would submit it if I was you

  18. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tempe, Land of Melting Sidewalks
    Posts
    571
    To me, the nose, lower lip and left ear look very similar on each person. It could be that there was a typo along the way some place and it was supposed to be "20" instead of "30". I would go ahead and submit it.

  19. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,169
    I think they look quite similar.

    I am not sure how much damage a body sustains when one jumps off a bridge, is it possible that it's hard to determine age given the circumstances?

  20. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    16,647
    I think this is Jane Doe's Namus page since the place and date and the case number match but it is not helpful, they haven't entered any information in there and it says her age is 0 to 0 years.

    Here is the link in case they get around to filling in the information one of these days.
    https://identifyus.org/cases/5932

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Donjeta For This Useful Post:


  22. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    164
    Did anyone ever submit this possible match??

  23. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    16,647
    The Namus age estimate is 20-40 now and there are dentals.

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Donjeta For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-30-2011, 05:25 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-25-2010, 07:49 PM
  3. Human remains found Golden Gate bridge 9/3/10
    By trigger in forum Missing Archives
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-21-2010, 09:49 PM
  4. Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Prevention Net Approved
    By lorelei in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-20-2008, 08:18 PM
  5. Deer crosses Golden Gate Bridge
    By Casshew in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-20-2004, 11:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •