I don't know, I bet they are all cowards when it comes to face-to-face confrontations.
The Seeker / Sports Freak /
I would prefer the DP for myself, the way we do it, with years of appeals, my own lawyer and team of advocates, kept out of the general population in my own cell...then put to sleep like a surgical patient.
Compared to that, LWOP would be the worst fate, imo. Of course, that's largely because I'd be living in hell around bad guys. Some people seek them out.
Still, I've read that there are skinheads waiting to abuse these guys... they'll live in fear every day. I hope.
ETA: That's not an endorsement of skinheads. I despise them too.
Last edited by Muffet; 12-09-2009 at 05:55 PM. Reason: eta, clarity
Surely judge knows difference between "abominable" (against nature) and "abdominal..."
Did I just see Hugh Newsom sitting there alone? It didn't even look like Gary and Deena were there.
eta: I just saw Gary and Mary, as they were leaving the courtroom.
Last edited by Muffet; 12-09-2009 at 06:15 PM.
I'd post a capture of GT, but every shot looks the same as the others I've posted.
Thanks everyone for all the updates, I was in and out all day and this is first place I came to check in on the days events. I am going to take a guess that we will know GT's fate by lunch time tomorrow and he will get Life behind bars. Have a great night everyone...........can't wait for VC's trail to begin.
Judge says jurors shouldn't be swayed by emotion over vics families (fat chance)
3 aggravators a given - heinous, done 2 avoid arrest, Chris burned. Less certain is Thomas "substantial role"
It only takes 1 aggravator however. It's really more about whether jury thinks Thomas not primary, rates chance
No deliberations tonight. See KNS tomorrow or online for full report
Torture-slaying trial, Day 8: George Thomas declines to testify
By Jamie Satterfield
I'd say 50/50 chance of death. This jury stunned us all with the previous verdict, so its hard to predict. I hope its death
'A person’s presence at the scene of a crime, along with
an association with the perpetrator of that crime, does not make one criminally
responsible. Under a theory of criminal responsibility, an individual's presence and
companionship with the perpetrator of a felony before and after the commission of an
offense are circumstances from which his participation or criminal intent in the crime
may be inferred.'
Last edited by kiki the parrot; 12-09-2009 at 10:41 PM.
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4545200#post4545200"]Accused Killers of Chris Newsom and Channon Christian on Trial #13 - G. Thomas Trial - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]