1022 users online (236 members and 786 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 177
  1. #1

    Motion to stop jail recordings: denied Thurdsay

    Judge Strickland said that Casey should not get special treatment in the jail.

    The defense wanted the jail to stop videotaping Casey whenever she was meeting with her lawyers.

    But the jail videotapes every inmate in those situations so the judge denied the motion. He also said he will review in camera any jail videos before they are released to the media. http://www.clickorlando.com/download...7/21995916.pdf
    Last edited by The World According; 12-17-2009 at 09:08 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    20,003
    Quote Originally Posted by The World According View Post
    Judge Denies Another Defense Motion In Casey Case

    Posted: 4:43 pm EST December 17, 2009

    Comment On This Story ››
    ORLANDO, Fla. -- Judge Stan Strickland denied another defense motion in the case against Casey Anthony Thursday. WFTV.com will post the motion as soon as possible.

    Judge Strickland said that Casey should not get special treatment in the jail.

    The defense wanted the jail to stop videotaping Casey whenever she was meeting with her lawyers or with her family.

    But the jail videotapes every inmate in those situations so the judge denied the motion. He also turned down three other motions that came out of last Friday's court hearing.
    So that's one more to go?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,959

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Thank you TWA but we need a link and make sure you don't violate copyright with your post. thanks

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by JBean View Post
    Thank you TWA but we need a link and make sure you don't violate copyright with your post. thanks
    I fixed it, added the link, thanks.http://www.clickorlando.com/download...7/21995916.pdf

    What is new, the news got it a little skewed, what the order says is about Attorney/Client visits, not family.
    Last edited by The World According; 12-17-2009 at 06:55 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,978
    I am sorry, I must be misunderstanding something - they video ALL inmate's visits with counsel?


    now I didnt think they were supposed to be doing that, everyone has a right to private counsel, and I do know it isnt an art, but people can read lips so I would think video could violate client-attorney priveledge?

    dont mind me - her visits with others should dang well be recorded if all inmates' are but I like rights and I am not sure this doesnt violate one?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,223
    SO according to the order (MOO) SS gets to view the tapes (of JB and KC) before they are released and decide if they will be prejudicial - this to make the delay in release minimal. It does say if the court says the tape is prejudicial " the court would then set a hearing at the request of any party in interest". I guess this is the point the media could request to view the tape and then report on it but not have it released??

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,575
    Quote Originally Posted by The World According View Post
    Judge Strickland said that Casey should not get special treatment in the jail.

    The defense wanted the jail to stop videotaping Casey whenever she was meeting with her lawyers or with her family.

    But the jail videotapes every inmate in those situations so the judge denied the motion. He also said he will review in camera any jail videos before they are released to the media. http://www.clickorlando.com/download...7/21995916.pdf
    Does the link work?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    In the Woods In Georgia
    Posts
    5,481
    Quote Originally Posted by 2goldfish View Post
    I am sorry, I must be misunderstanding something - they video ALL inmate's visits with counsel?


    now I didnt think they were supposed to be doing that, everyone has a right to private counsel, and I do know it isnt an art, but people can read lips so I would think video could violate client-attorney priveledge?

    dont mind me - her visits with others should dang well be recorded if all inmates' are but I like rights and I am not sure this doesnt violate one?
    Baez and Casey have been offered to my understanding to request a room to discuss the case without camera's. They apparently like the room they are in, so choose to complain about that one, instead of just asking to go to another room.
    Honestly, if these video's were meant to be distributed, we would have seen them sharing a twizzler a long time ago. This is a safety measure in the jail, will be when Casey is in prison, and was long before she decided to kill Caylee.
    Not everything the jail does is or has been for Casey..to them, she is just another criminal.
    I see no disrespect to the client/lawyer privilege at all..
    Justice For Caylee Marie

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6,096
    All visits are video/audio taped - but attorney client visits are only video'd without audio


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by The World According View Post
    Judge Strickland said that Casey should not get special treatment in the jail.

    The defense wanted the jail to stop videotaping Casey whenever she was meeting with her lawyers or with her family.

    But the jail videotapes every inmate in those situations so the judge denied the motion. He also said he will review in camera any jail videos before they are released to the media. http://www.clickorlando.com/download...7/21995916.pdf
    Just to clarify - he has denied holding back any of the family/Casey videos, but has issued an in camera viewing if anyone wishes the release of lawyer/client videos.
    This news report is pretty wishy washy with it's reporting, but the actual court document seems to make it clear he is not talking about reviewing the family visits - right?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by 2goldfish View Post
    I am sorry, I must be misunderstanding something - they video ALL inmate's visits with counsel?


    now I didnt think they were supposed to be doing that, everyone has a right to private counsel, and I do know it isnt an art, but people can read lips so I would think video could violate client-attorney priveledge?

    dont mind me - her visits with others should dang well be recorded if all inmates' are but I like rights and I am not sure this doesnt violate one?
    I think they can sit with their backs to the camera if they wish - this is about passing contraband, touching, or I guess in the case of some prisoners, violence occurring.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6,096
    this is a quote from JS -

    "The court has witnessed at least one prior video, which could arguably affect the defendant's right to a fair trial, as well as jury selection," Strickland said in his ruling.

    All I got to say is WOWSER - that must be some kind of video. IIRC it was the one where Casey learned about the finding of Caylee's remains? Or is it the one of her and JB eating the licorice? I know, I know, we don't know that for sure but......which one is JS referring to? Anybody?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    16,024
    Quote Originally Posted by TotallyObsessed View Post
    this is a quote from JS -

    "The court has witnessed at least one prior video, which could arguably affect the defendant's right to a fair trial, as well as jury selection," Strickland said in his ruling.

    All I got to say is WOWSER - that must be some kind of video. IIRC it was the one where Casey learned about the finding of Caylee's remains? Or is it the one of her and JB eating the licorice? I know, I know, we don't know that for sure but......which one is JS referring to? Anybody?
    The news about Caylee when she listened to the report. If you remember, he sealed it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In my own reality...it's nicer here.
    Posts
    12,006
    Is it normal for me to be so dang excited about this?

Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Dominic Casey: Motion to Strike Notice of Deposition & Motion for Protective Order#2
    By The World According in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 566
    Last Post: 07-10-2011, 07:49 PM
  2. 2010.04.29 Motion to Seal Casey's Jail Logs. Why?
    By Bittiness39 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 285
    Last Post: 10-26-2010, 10:04 AM
  3. Local 6 - DP motion just DENIED
    By Muzikman in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 250
    Last Post: 12-22-2009, 03:25 PM
  4. Emergency Hearing re: remains-UPDATE MOTION DENIED
    By SuziQ in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 256
    Last Post: 12-13-2008, 01:55 AM
  5. GUILTY NY - Reuben Petrus for sexual assault on NYC subway, 2004
    By mysteriew in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-06-2005, 12:18 PM

Tags for this Thread