11-19-2009, 07:44 PM #1
2009.11.19 Defense Files Motion suggesting Kronk as Killer #4
What a crock! guess we are seeing the SODDI starting officially now.
Waste! HUGE waste!
Thanks to Q.B. and Angel who cares for the linksCaylee - WE will NEVER forget. Neither will Karma.
12-24-2009, 02:22 PM #2Inactive
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
So this blew over already?
12-24-2009, 02:42 PM #3
12-27-2009, 06:04 PM #4Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Had KC awaken one morning and claimed Caylee was missing as her bed was empty, then maybe, the defense could have tried to accuse Kronk---But---No Way now----
KC has always maintained she was the last to see Caylee alive and handed Caylee over to the non-existing "Nanny". This does not even come close to planting a doubt in anyone's mind.
They must keep throwing stuff against the wall and pray that something will stick.
12-27-2009, 06:13 PM #5
I can't comprehend how the defense can actually believe the jury would buy this theory. RK had no connection to the A's, their house, Casey's car or more importantly Caylee. Even if RK has a g/f who works in the jail and overheard something, what does that have to do with how Caylee died and how her remains got where he found them? And again, how is the defense going to admit that what Casey told LE (that she left Caylee with ZFG) was a lie and expect them to find her "innocent"? MOORest in Peace
Joey, Summer, Gianni & Joseph Mateo
12-28-2009, 03:03 AM #6
Unless Casey has decided to weave a tale about knowing RK, before Caylee went "missing".
12-28-2009, 03:08 AM #7
12-30-2009, 03:58 PM #8
Hope this is the right place to put this, I don't know if it has been posted before. It's an article from Lillian Glass on deception and the Jill K. interview. Plus lots of info on others like Casey, LKB, Roy K....I posted just a part on LKB below, much more at link.
Meter Reader’s Ex Wife, Jill Kerley, Shows Signals of Deception When Discussing Roy Kronk Possibly Murdering Caylee Anthony
"When I heard veteran attorney, Linda Kenny Baden a member of Casey’s defense team referring to Kerely’s accusations about Roy Kronk on the Today Show, I observed via her body language and verbal ”tells” that even she, didn’t believe what Ms. Kerely was saying."
"While the attorney said the right words in her attempt to defend Casey, her body language screamed that she was clearly not buying it. Her lip licks, eye gaze, lack of hand movement, shoulder shrugs and numerous other “tells” while making pertinent statements said it all."
"Once again, it validated my thoughts that Jose Baez’s team was really doing whatever they could to cast reasonable doubt . But it wasn’t working- at least from my standpoint."
Last edited by Searchfortruth; 12-30-2009 at 04:02 PM.
12-30-2009, 04:14 PM #9
Here is an interesting theory.
Expanding only on the theory listed above............perhaps a "failure" to complete a task is motive for this motion. I am not saying I think this to be the case, just offering a presented theory for consideration.
12-30-2009, 04:24 PM #10
Exactly! This area was already searched.
This area that is so close to Lee's house.
It really doesn't matter....
But, why put Caylee in a place where remains could be found?
12-30-2009, 04:31 PM #11Former Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Yeah the only thing that I can think of to make the connection is that he was their meter reader, so he had to be in front of the house at some point.
The Mountain of other evidence against him is just circumstantial, just like Casey. That is probably why he should be looked at as an equal suspect.
The 5 W's really bother me.
We only think we have the who, but we are still missing:
The How (oops sorry I guess I meant 4 W's and one H)
Now I understand that SA 's job is to make KC look guilty, but for LE with hind sight, and not finding any smoking gun, it is their job to continue to look for the truth.
Nothing I stated was stated as fact. It is of my opinion only.
12-30-2009, 04:42 PM #12
IMO, there is no mountain of evidence against Kronk, there is only the suggestion of it in an attempt to create reasonable doubt. His testimony may or may not create that doubt, depends on how well the defense presents it or what information they have to back it up.
Also, it is not the job of the SA to make anyone look guilty, it is their job to reveal the facts. If those facts reveal guilt through their mountain of evidence against KC, then so be it. It is a subtle distinction but an important one.
12-30-2009, 04:43 PM #13
The mountain of other evidence ? The only mountain of evidence I'm aware of is the one sitting on Casey. Had Roy any involvement in this crime, why would he call the cops when he found the remains ? The thought that he is involved is ridiculous when all the arrows point to Casey.
12-30-2009, 04:49 PM #14
The following is more deception analysis from Dr. Glass...This on Roy K.
"Before I share my thoughts and observations, I want to say that as soon as Roy Kronk came forward and appeared publically, I scrutinized his body language and communication patterns. I I did not find any “tells” indicated deception or that he was not telling the truth."
"He appeared direct and forthright in his body language as there was a fluidity in his movements with no hesitation in his voice. What he said matched how he moved and comported himself. He appeared genuine to me as he discussed his finding Caylee’s body."
12-30-2009, 05:12 PM #15
By Insomnia Momma in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 599Last Post: 12-18-2009, 01:16 AM
By momtective in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 445Last Post: 09-19-2009, 08:51 PM
By Drivenon in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years oldReplies: 408Last Post: 08-21-2009, 09:38 AM