i think this lady is mostly discredited at this forum. i'm wondering why there is not more discussion about her or at least some more info about why she should not be taken seriously. there are aspects of her "story" which make sense at least to me: she describes abuse such as use of a garotee and electrocution which coincide with aspects of the ramsey case, she describes christmas parties as the pretext for such abuse and points toward the whites (there were two christmas parties - one at the ramseys and one at the whites. also i believe forensics pointed toward sexual abuse of jonbent two days before christmas day which i believe coincides with the ramsey's party), her allegations of powerful people involved would help explain in part why this case is growing cold and the DA's office appears at odds with the police, reports showed that krebs had recently been physically and sexually abused as she had said, krebs goes in hiding out of fear for her life, the ladies therapists gets threatening calls, etc.
this type of abuse in families and even in more extended groups has been documented in other cases, why does no one seem to take it too seriously here?
remember also that JB had problems with bedwetting ( a sign of sexual abuse), appeared down a lot to third parties (low esteem or depression in a 6 year old -- why whould that be), and had been treated numerous times by her physicians for a variety of ailments (some "falls" or other "accidents")...
can anyone shed some light? thanks
this type of abuse in families and even in more extended groups has been documented in other cases, why does no one seem to take it too seriously here?
remember also that JB had problems with bedwetting ( a sign of sexual abuse), appeared down a lot to third parties (low esteem or depression in a 6 year old -- why whould that be), and had been treated numerous times by her physicians for a variety of ailments (some "falls" or other "accidents")...
can anyone shed some light? thanks