can someone please help me with "searching" here n WS?
I want to be able to study all the posts that have to do with LE and thier statements regarding cell phones.
How do I do this? TYIA
Last edited by amysmom; 04-04-2010 at 12:59 PM.
So Puf, hope this helps, I'll try to gather the documentation from the courts site to support and get it to you.
Last edited by Gone Too Soon; 04-04-2010 at 03:42 PM. Reason: grammar error
"There was some debate as to whether she left the academy on break or if she was done with school for the day, and I just received a reward information poster/flyer to put up in my local business which states that she left for a 15 minute break and never returned."
If this is the same flyer in the picture posted by Moonsabove, then this particular poster came out sometime around March 10th, or, at the very least, that's when Moonsabove got it. Was there more than one poster that was distributed, I wonder?
Last edited by ajfa; 04-04-2010 at 06:02 PM.
For those of you asking about JV going to Shari's, I asked him about it and here's his answer:
He said that he went straight home after leaving PC at 12:45 the evening MC went missing (or, I guess it would be considered the following morning.) He said that LE asked him if he went to Shari's afterward, and they asked this multiple times even though he already told them no. Apparently, they were able to confirm he wasn't there, through questing employees, looking at surveillance, etc. They then actually apologized to him for the repetitive questioning.
Please add that JF built the spec home and list the address.
Thanks , have fun with the pups, only little once!!
PS, I sent you the addess in PM
Would LE be tapping phones if they have a POI? Can internet be tapped as well?
Jerry Moore on Sunday morning Feb. 14th, (the day after MC's body found), gave another verbal interview with GLC and stated: "The crime lab was in town on Wednesday and processed MacKenzie's vehicle and nothing substantial was found in the vehicle."
IIRC, the task force asked the crime lab to take another shot at getting some forensic data from MC's car, but I don't know where I heard that or when that search occurred.
Not that it really helps us much, but the time-line can now also include:
10 February 2010 (Wednesday):
"The crime lab was in town on Wednesday and processed MacKenzie's vehicle and nothing substantial was found in the vehicle." Quote from Chelan County Sheriff's spokesman Jerry Moore via verbal interview given to golakechelan.
Sidenote: We know that it was Wednesday the 10th because the interview was given, and posted at GoLakeChelan, on Sunday the 14th. Meaning it could only have been the Wednesday the 10th, the day after MC's car was found, which this search occurred.
Can they legally tell the family not to talk about it at all or do they need to get a gag order to enforce this? From my research, gag orders are only given during the trial.
Maybe someone here knows more about this and could explain it better to me. I tried doing my own research online, but couldn't find anything about police telling the victim's family to be quiet. Ugh.
Yes, I realize this is a stretch -- the vehicle has to get back to Target within an hour so as not to be noticed when JV gets off work and if something happened to MC how did the vehicle make it back??? Just grasping...
If no one could have had access to JV's vehicle, does he know of anyone that has the same, (almost exact), vehicle as his? Maybe just something he noticed around town, (or sometimes owners even like to meet?).
Someone stated earlier about a friend of JF having one that was same, even with a spoiler, but different color. The color difference was such that it might not be notice if LE were looking at black and white security camera images from Sharis. More ponderings...
Thanks again Melissa for whatever you come back with...
And yes, IIRC, there was an article somewhere quoting I believe RC that LE had asked him not to talk about the case.
ETA: According to just posted comment, it sounds like it was WC that made that statement. Although WC may have additional information about the case/suspect(s) that JV does not and that would be why she was told to not to talk about the case while JV was not ask this. If this is true, that LE doesn't care if JV talks about the case, I would think WW should be told this information so they can do an interview with him, (if he is willing). Getting this story back on the front page might actually help the investigation -- informing the suspect(s) that this is NEVER just gonna go away.
Last edited by alt.theory; 04-04-2010 at 06:39 PM.