not_my_kids
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
- Messages
- 12,689
- Reaction score
- 276
Here's what bothers me, the clothes that were found with her, don't match the body description.
We know she was wearing the shirt when she was found, we know she was not wearing the jeans. They were found near her.
She is described as 150-160 pounds - the jeans are listed as a size 5. www.heraldonline.com - there is no way that a woman who is 150-160 pounds can wear a size 5 in jeans.
Plus, I have previously described my doubts about a woman that age wearing toe socks. I wonder what size the sneakers are and if she had them on or were they found with her. The shoes look brand new.
I would assume that one of the ways they determined the age range is by whether she had her wisdom teeth or not.
Well, they do say the area where she was found was a bit of a party spot, I wouldn't be surprised to find the clothes weren't hers. The size in clothing doesn't match the size of body. And the clothing doesn't seem to match the age range.
If it helps, for comparison only, I am almost 24, have that pair of jeans shown, ironically, in a size 5, I have several hoodies, many of which I don't wear anymore, and I think I do own a pair of toe socks, although it has been awhile since I've worn them. (Like 2 years.)
I started to think about this woman last night, and I think it's possible that she may have left home in a hurry, either to help a friend in need, or because she was forced to get dressed fast. The pants I would bet aren't hers, they either came from the home or place where she died, since they think she was dumped there, or they were left after a party.
Just an observation that popped into my head. If I were to get dressed in a hurry, I might end up in the same basic set of clothes, and people would think they were too "young" for my actual age.