Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubby
If he was or not, he still obviously needs to be id'd. I'm trying to rack my brain on where this is going and how determining, if I am reading this correctly, whether or not he was a transient for a period of time prior to his being located would benefit the quest to identify him. Am I just brain dead today?
I really mean no disrespect, so I hope this did not offend anyone, I am just confused as to why it appears a higher priority, to determine whether or not he was a transient.
|
Cubby.. I'm glad I came back and reread your post - I agree; does it matter if he was homeless? To me it does not.
Benjaman has a good work ethic and if finding out who he is will allow him to get a job or to collect social security benefits (because of age) then what happened in the past will not affect my personal opinion of him.
I'm very fond of him; when I originally came here I was willing to do what needed to be done to help him get whatever he needed; such as Xrays, records or whatever but am now not in the position to do so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by believe09
I moved your post Rose...
Everything bolded here by me today at this moment indicates comments inserted by Nurse Betty. They are NOT the independent statements of the people who treated Benjaman after he was discovered.
|
Thank you for cleaning it up.
It's my opinion the facts you now have that you just fixed should be the start of a new post leading us to discuss what is known as
fact.
Does that make sense? It's why I worked on it today because his story has taken on a life of it's own that it's hard to tell what post has what information.
How do you feel about editing the 1st post in this thread and putting it there?
Threaded Mode
